THEORETICAL STUDY

Fair Use in Controlled Digital Lending by Libraries: Analysis of the Relevant U.S. Cases and Its Implications

  • Wang Quanli ,
  • Liu Yan ,
  • Gao Kai
Expand
  • Xiangtan University School of Public Administration of China, Xiangtan 411105

Received date: 2023-12-01

  Revised date: 2024-02-24

  Online published: 2024-09-12

Supported by

This work is supported by the project of 2022 Graduate Education Reform Research Projects in Hunan Province titled “Research on the Investigation of Academic Reading Behavior and Guidance Path for Master’s Students from the Perspective of High-Quality Development” (Grant No. 2022JGYB085).

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Through an analysis of typical cases such as the American Authors Guild v. Hathi Trust case and Cambridge University Press v. Albert case, this paper explores the implications of American jurisprudence in determining the fair use in controlled digital lending in libraries. [Method/Process] Utilizing a case study approach, this research delves into the primary considerations of American courts in adjudicating cases involving CDL in libraries. These considerations include the purpose and nature of use, the nature of the work, the quantity and substantiality of the portion used, as well as market effects. Furthermore, by comparing how the courts interpret and apply the fair use principle in different cases, we aim to uncover patterns and trends. [Result/Conclusion] The study finds that American courts tend to consider multiple factors when determining whether CDL in libraries constitutes fair use. While upholding copyright protection, the courts also strive to satisfy the public’s legitimate need for information access. These precedents not only provide significant guidance for libraries in the United States to conduct CDL, but also offer valuable references for libraries in China when dealing with similar issues.

Cite this article

Wang Quanli , Liu Yan , Gao Kai . Fair Use in Controlled Digital Lending by Libraries: Analysis of the Relevant U.S. Cases and Its Implications[J]. Library and Information Service, 2024 , 68(17) : 16 -27 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2024.17.002

References

[1] ALA JoBLIST.2022 ACRL Academic Library trends and statistics survey now open![EB/OL]. [2024-02-20]. https://acrl.ala.org/acrlinsider/2022-acrl-academic-library-trends-and-statistics-survey-now-open/.
[2] 中国保护知识产权网.网络著作权侵权诉讼的四大抗辩事由[EB/OL]. [2023-12-27]. http://ipr.mofcom.gov.cn/article/bzzn/jjzn/zzqjj/201303/1737052_1.html. (China IPR News. Four defenses in the lawsuit of online copyright infringement[EB/OL]. [2023-12-27]. http://ipr.mofcom.gov.cn/article/bzzn/jjzn/zzqjj/201303/1737052_1.html.)
[3] International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. IFLA releases a statement on controlled digital lending[EB/OL]. [2024-01-03]. https://www.ifla.org/news/ifla-releases-astatement-on-controlled-digital-lending/.
[4] HANSEN D R, COURTNRY K K. A white paper on controlled digital lending of library books[EB/OL]. [2023-12-08]. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42664235.
[5] 中国知识产权网. 浅析著作权合理使用的司法认定路径[EB/OL]. [2024-02-21]. http://www.iprchn.com/cipnews/news_content.aspx?newsId=123666. (China IPR News. A brief analysis of the judicial recognition path for reasonable Use of Copyright[EB/OL]. [2024-02-21]. http://www.iprchn.com/cipnews/news_content.aspx?newsId=123666.)
[6] 湖北省版权保护中心. 新法讲解| 著作权法中的13种“合理使用”[EB/OL]. [2024-03-20]. http://www.ccct.net.cn/html/bqzx/2021/0726/2953.html. (Hubei Copyright Protection Center. New law explanation | 13 types of fair use in Copyright law[EB/OL]. [2024-03-20]. http://www.ccct.net.cn/html/bqzx/2021/0726/2953.html.)
[7] 鄂尔多斯智库. 美国宪法全文(中文版)[EB/OL]. [2024-03-20]. http://www.ordoszk.gov.cn/dspd/dspd_zksw/fl/201203/t20120309_596473.html. (Ordos Think Tank. Full text of the constitution of the United States[EB/OL]. [2024-03-20]. http://www.ordoszk.gov.cn/dspd/dspd_zksw/fl/201203/t20120309_596473.html.)
[8] U.S. Copyright Office. Copyright law of the United States (Title17) [EB/OL]. [2024-03-30]. https://www.copyright.gov/title17/.
[9] 新华网.细说著作权之“合理使用”不是“任性使用”[EB/OL]. [2024-03-30]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/2017-05/18/c_136294348.htm. (Xinhua News. Explaining copyright: fair use is not arbitrary use"[EB/OL]. [2024-03-30]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/2017-05/18/c_136294348.htm.)
[10] WU M M. Building a collaborative digital collection: a necessary evolution in libraries[J]. Law library journal, 2011, 103(4): 527-552.
[11] Controlled Digital Lending. Position statement on Controlled Digital Lending by libraries[EB/OL]. [2023-09-14]. https://controlleddigitallending.org/statement/.
[12] HANSEN D R, COURTNRY K K. A white paper on controlled digital lending of library books[EB/OL]. [2023-10-08]. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42664235.
[13] U.S. Copyright Office. Copyright law of the United States (Title 17)[EB/OL]. [2024-03-30]. https://www.copyright.gov/title17/.
[14] Harvard University. Copyright and fair use education guide[EB/OL]. [2024-03-03]. https://ogc.harvard.edu/pages/copyright-and-fair-use.
[15] Internet Archive Blogs. Copyright law does not stand in the way of a library’s right to lend its books[EB/OL]. [2024-03-02]. http://blog.archive.org/2022/07/08/eff-legal-director-copyright-law-does-not-stand-in-the-way-of-a-librarys-right-to-lend-its-books/.
[16] CHARLIE B, KYLE C, TOM C, et al. Statement on using controlled digital lending as a mechanism for interlibrary loan[EB/OL]. [2024-02-08]. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/37371630.
[17] 余祥, 聂建强. 版权视角下图书馆受控数字借阅模式的构建[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2022(7): 59-65. (YU X, NIE J Q. Construction of controlled digital lending mode in libraries from the perspective of copyright[J]. Digital library forum, 2022(7): 59-65.)
[18] 边祥龙. 著作权视角下受控数字借阅的可行性[EB/OL]. [2023-12-13]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/h3A1j_BhlEkdo91K714HJQ. (BIAN X L. Construction of controlled digital borrowing mode in libraries from the perspective of copyright[EB/OL]. [2023-12-13]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/h3A1j_BhlEkdo91K714HJQ.)
[19] 张立新, 阮开欣. 受控数字借阅的版权合法性及在我国的应用探讨[J]. 图书馆建设, 2023(6): 122-128, 140. (ZHANG L X, RUAN K X. Copyright legality of controlled digital lending and its application in China [J]. Library developmen, 2023(6): 122-128, 140.)
[20] 鈴木康平. Controlled Digital Lending のフェア·ユース該当性と日本法への示唆[J]. 情報ネットワーク·ローレビュー, 2021, 20: 1-19. (KOPHEI S. Fair use applicability of controlled digital lending and implications for Japan Law [J]. Information network law review, 2021, 20: 1-19.)
[21] DE CASTELL C, DICKISON J, MAU T, et al. Controlled digital lending of library books in Canada[J]. Partnership, 2022, 17(2): 1-35.
[22] 商建刚. “受控数字借阅模式”对我国著作权合理使用制度的挑战[EB/OL]. [2024-01-11]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18014997. (SHANG J G. Controlled digital borrowing mode challenges to China's copyright fair use system[EB/OL]. [2024-01-11]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18014997.)
[23] 李艾真. 公共图书馆的受控数字借阅模式[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(7): 113-121. (LI A Z.Analysis and enlightenment of controlled digital lending mode in public library[J]. Library tribune, 2022, 42(7): 113-121.)
[24] BURTLE L, BURRIGHT M. Academic libraries as unlikely defendants: a comparative fair use analysis of the Georgia State University e-reserves and HathiTrust cases[J]. Library trends, 2018, 67(2): 376-393.
[25] RAYE J M. HathiTrust digital library and fair use[EB/OL]. [2023-12-08]. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/62674.
[26] 肖燕珠, 胡汉婷. 受控数字借阅:国外实践与思考[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2022, 31(4): 85-92. (XIAO Y Z, HU H T. Controlled digital lending: foreign practice and thoughts[J]. Journal of the national library of China, 2022, 31(4): 85-92.)
[27] 阮光册, 张祎笛. 图书馆实施受控数字借阅服务模式的探讨[J]. 图书馆, 2023(1): 44-50. (RUAN G C, ZHANG Y D. New era characteristics and content elements of the international discourse of Chinese library science[J]. Library, 2023(1): 44-50.)
[28] BOARD B, STUTZMAN K. Controlled digital lending: an E-book solution when there is no E-book?[J]. Atla summary of proceedings, 2020, 74: 157-165.
[29] SHEPPARD A, BAILEY L, KATZ A, et al. Controlled digital lending (CDL): a panel to discuss legal and practical considerations involved in the implementation of CDL by public and post-secondary libraries in Canada[EB/OL]. [2024-02-22]. https://www.sfu.ca/search.html?q=CDL&p=&search-scope=sfu.
[30] 王果, 张立彬. 挑战、困境与化解:数字环境下我国图书馆合理使用条款及其适用的再探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(10): 5-11. (WANG G, ZHANG L B. Chanllenges, plight and solutions: further discussion on library fair use clauses and its application under the digital environment[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(10): 5-11.)
[31] 吴高. 数字环境下图书馆孤儿作品合理使用规则设计研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2023(1): 84-94. (WU G. On the design of fair use rules of orphan works in library under digital environment[J]. Library development, 2023(1): 84-94.)
[32] 梁九业, 于海燕. 从概念到功能:公有领域对公共图书馆著作权侵权抗辩的体系构塑[J]. 图书馆建设, 2022(6): 82-91. (LIANG J Y, YU H Y.From concept to function: the construction of the public domain defense system against copyright infringement of public libraries[J]. Library development, 2022(6): 82-91.)
[33] LEAR C. Controlled digital lending of video resources: ensuring the provision of streaming access to videos for pedagogical purposes in academic libraries[J]. Journal of copyright in education & librarianship, 2021, 5(1): 1-19.
[34] JOHNSON E. Forging the future of course reserves: implementing controlled digital lending (CDL) at a university library[EB/OL]. [2024-02-22]. https://rrpress.utsa.edu/handle/20.500.12588/1797.
[35] WALSH B, RANA H. Continuity of academic library services during the pandemic the University of Toronto libraries response[J]. Journal of scholarly publishing, 2020, 51(4): 237-245.
[36] 吴高. 图书馆为专门适用主体之著作权合理使用条款国际比较及启示[J/OL]. 图书馆建设. [2024-02-24]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20240103.1557.004.html. (WU G. International comparison and enlightenment of fair use clauses of copyright for special subject of library[J/OL]. Library development. [2024-02-24]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20240103.1557.004.html.)
[37] 张海舰, 王琪昕, 张晓琳, 等.利益平衡视野下受控数字借阅发展瓶颈问题及对策[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2023, 41(1): 94-100, 105. (ZHANG H J, WANG Q X, ZHANG X L.The development of controlled digital lending from the perspective of balance of interests[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2023, 41(1): 94-100, 105.)
[38] REID B E. Copyright and disability[EB/OL]. [2024-03-22]. http://scholar.law.colorado.edu/faculty-articles/1547.
[39] AYOUG D A, BAADA F N A, BAAYEL P. Access to library services and facilities by persons with disability: insights from academic libraries in Ghana[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2021, 53(1): 167-180.
[40] KOLESNYKOVA T O. Conference proceedings of university library at a new stage of socialcommunications development[C/OL]. [2024-02-01]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 338206702_The_Role_of_Libraries_as_Publishers_in_the_Open_Education_Landscape_Reflecting_Modern_World_Practice_of_Open_Textbooks.
[41] 袁海龙. 公共有声数字图书馆合理使用分析——以《马拉喀什条约》及视障群体参与全民阅读为视角[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2019(5): 80-86. (YUAN H L. The reasonable analyses in fair use of public audio library——Based on the Marrakesh Treaty and the participation of the visually impaired groups in the universal reading[J]. Research on library science, 2019(5): 80-86.)
[42] 吴钢, 陈珑绮, 石乐怡. 新西兰图书馆版权例外制度研究[J]. 图书馆建设, 2018(9): 41-48. (WU G, CHEN L Q, SHI L Y. Study on the system of copyright exceptions for libraries in New Zealand[J]. Library development, 2018(9): 41-48.)
[43] 纪睿哲, 赵力. 国外图书馆版权合理使用馆舍限制的突破及其启示[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2023(2): 51-55, 72. (JI R Z, ZHAO L. Breakthrough of the premises restrictions on copyright fair use of foreign library and its enlightenment[J]. Library work and study, 2023(2): 51-55, 72.)
[44] RIMMER M. The Internet archive and the national emergency library: copyright law and COVID-19[J]. Laws, 2022, 11(5): 79.
[45] BLC Controlled Digital Lending Working Group. Consortial CDL: implementing controlled digital lending as a mechanism for interlibrary loan[EB/OL]. [2023-12-25]. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1208&context=scholcom.
[46] XU Q, LIN L, WU X. Implementing controlled digital lending with Google drive and Apps script: a case study at the NYU Shanghai Library[J]. International journal of librarianship, 2021, 6(1): 37-54.
[47] WU Z, SHEN S, LU C, et al. How to protect reader lending privacy under a cloud environment: a technical method[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2022, 40(6): 1746-1765.
[48] U.S. Copyright Office. Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/authorsguild-hathitrust-2dcir2014.pdf.
[49] U.S. Copyright Office. Cambridge University Press v. Albert[EB/OL]. [2024-03-11]. https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/summaries/cambridge-university-pres-albert-11thcir2018.pdf.
[50] Association of Research Libraries. Georgia State University (GSU) Fair use decision recap and implications: Memo to ARL library directors[EB/OL]. [2024-01-27]. https://www.arl.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/issue-brief-gsu-decision-15may12.pdf.
[51] 中国法学网. 谷歌图书馆案The authors guild, Inc. v Google, Inc.判决述评[EB/OL]. [2024-02-21]. http://iolaw.cssn.cn/fxyjdt/201701/t20170109_4647161.shtml. (China Legal Science. A review of the decision in the authors guild, Inc. v Google, Inc. in Google Library[EB/OL]. [2024-02-21]. http://iolaw.cssn.cn/fxyjdt/201701/t20170109_4647161.shtml.)
[52] 中国贸易新闻网. 美多位作家诉ChatGPT侵犯版权[EB/OL]. [2024-02-21]. https://www.chinatradenews.com.cn/content/202307/14/c151792.html. (China Trade News. A number of writers in the United States sued ChatGPT for copyright infringement[EB/OL]. [2024-02-21]. https://www.chinatradenews.com.cn/content/202307/14/c151792.html.)
[53] Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.[EB/OL]. [2024-02-21]. https://fairuse.stanford.edu/case/kirtsaeng-v-john-wiley-sons-inc/.
[54] 中国人大网. 中华人民共和国著作权法[EB/OL]. [2023-12-16]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202011/848e73f58d4e4c5b82f69d25d46048c6.shtml. (The National People's Congress of Republic of China. Copyright law of China[EB/OL]. [2023-12-16]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202011/848e73f58d4e4c5b82f69d25d46048c6.shtml.)
[55] 中国人大网. 信息网络传播权保护条例(2013修订)[EB/OL]. [2023-12-16]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/c2/c188/c217/201905/t20190523_23413.html. (The National People's Congress of Republic of China. Regulation on the protection of the right of communication to the public on information networks(2013 revision)[EB/OL]. [2023-12-16]. http://www.npc.gov.cn/c2/c188/c217/201905/t20190523_23413.html.)
[56] World Intellectual Property Organization. Berne convention for the protection of literary and artistic works[EB/OL]. [2023-12-16]. https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/index.html.
[57] 中华人民共和国最高人民法院网. 《最高人民法院关于充分发挥知识产权审判职能作用推动社会主义文化大发展大繁荣和促进经济自主协调发展若干问题的意见》[EB/OL]. [2023-12-16]. https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-3534.html. (The Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China. Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on fully leveraging the role of intellectual property trial functions to promote the vast development and prosperity of socialist culture and facilitate the autonomous and coordinated development of the economy on several issues[EB/OL]. [2023-12-16]. https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-3534.html.)
Outlines

/