[1] 曹建峰, 陈楚仪. AIGC浪潮下, 合成数据关乎人工智能的未来[J]. 新经济导刊, 2022(4): 25-31. (CAO J F, CHEN C Y. Under the wave of AIGC, synthetic data is related to the future of artificial intelligence[J]. New economic herald, 2022(4): 25-31.)
[2] 刘细文, 孙蒙鸽, 王茜, 等. DIKIW逻辑链下GPT大模型对文献情报工作的潜在影响分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(21): 3-12. (LIU X W, SUN M G, WANG Q, et al. Analysis of the potential impact of the GPT big model under the DIKIW logic chain on literature and information work [J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(21): 3-12.)
[3] 梁怀新, 宋诚. AIGC时代的网络信息内容生态安全风险及其治理——兼以ChatGPT为对象的实验访谈案例分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(20): 58-69. (LIANG H X, SONG C. The ecological security risks and governance of network information content in the AIGC era: an experimental interview case analysis based on ChatGPT [J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(20): 58-69.)
[4] 张强, 王潇冉, 高颖, 等. ChatGPT生成与学者撰写文献摘要的对比研究——以信息资源管理领域为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(8): 35-47. (ZHANG Q, WANG X R, GAO Y, et al. A comparative study of ChatGPT generation and scholars writing literature abstracts— taking the field of information resource management as an example [J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(8): 35-47.)
[5] 霍顿, 安小米. 信息资源管理: 概念和案例[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2013. (HUO D, AN X M. Information resource management: concepts and cases[M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2013.)
[6] CHU T, SONG Z, YANG C. How to protect copyright data in optimization of large language models?[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. 2024, 38(16): 17871-17879.
[7] WIKIPEDIA. Hallucination (artificial intelligence)[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Hallucination_(artificial _intelligence).
[8] ICML. Clarification on large language model policy LLM [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://icml.cc/Conferences/2023/llm-policy.
[9] BOYD-GRABER J, OKAZAKI N, ROGERS A. ACL 2023 policy on AI writing assistance [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://2023.aclweb.org/blog/ACL-2023-policy.
[10] NATURE. Authorship [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://www.nature.com/nature/editorial-policies/authorship.
[11] CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. OPWNAI: cybercriminals starting to use ChatGPT [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://research.checkpoint.com/2023/opwnai-cybercriminals-starting-to-use-chatgpt.
[12] STOKEL-WALKER C, VAN NOORDEN R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science[J]. Nature, 2023, 614(7947): 214-216.
[13] LIU J W, KANG Y Y, TANG D, et al. Order-disorder:imitation adversarial attacks for black-box neural ranking models[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 ACM sigsac conference on computer and communications security. New York: ACM, 2022: 2025-2039.
[14] WESTERLUND M. The emergence of deepfake technology:a review[J]. Technology innovation management review, 2019, 9(11): 39-52.
[15] VERMA P, OREMUS W. ChatGPT invented a sexual harassment scandal and named a real law prof as the accused[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology /2023/04/05/chatgpt-lies/.
[16] LÓPEZ M, ChatGPT and Bing give problems: emotional breakdowns, strange answers and more[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://en.softonic.com/articles/chatgpt-bing-problems.
[17] MA Y Q, LIU J W, YI F, et al. AI vs. human—differentiation analysis of scientific content generation[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10416.
[18] 张华平, 李林翰, 李春锦.ChatGPT中文性能测评与风险应对[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(3): 16-25. (ZHANG H P, LI L H, LI C J. ChatGPT Chinese performance evaluation and risk response[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2023, 7(3): 16-25.)
[19] MARCUS G, DAVIS E. Large language models like ChatGPT say the darnedest things[EB/OL]. [2024-07-28]. https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/large-language-models-like-chatgpt.
[20] BORJI A. A categorical archive of chatgpt failures[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03494, 2023.
[21] 王超, 孔祥辉. 大型预训练语言模型在网络健康信息鉴别中的应用探讨[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2023, 35(6): 51-59. (WANG C, KONG X H. Application of large-scale pre-trained language model in identification of online health information[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(6): 51-59.)
[22] 朱禹, 陈关泽, 陆泳溶, 等. 生成式人工智能治理行动框架: 基于AIGC事故报道文本的内容分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(4): 41-51. (ZHU Y, CHEN G Z, LU Y R, et al. Generative AI governance action framework: content analysis of AIGC accident report texts[J]. Library and information knowledge, 2023, 40(4): 41-51.)
[23] 刘明, 吴忠明, 廖剑, 等. 大语言模型的教育应用: 原理、现状与挑战——从轻量级BERT到对话式ChatGPT[J]. 现代教育技术, 2023, 33(8): 19-28. (LIU M, WU Z M, LIAO J, et al.Educational application of large language models: principles, current status and challenges: from lightweight BERT to conversational ChatGPT[J]. Modern educational technology, 2023, 33(8): 19-28.)
[24] 吴英华, 罗家锋, 林成创. 迈入人工智能新时代:ChatGPT在智慧医疗应用场景研究与思考[J]. 数据通信, 2023(4): 33-38, 54. (WU Y H, LUO J F, LIN C C. Entering a new era of artificial intelligence: research and thinking on ChatGPT application scenarios in smart medical care[J]. Data communication, 2023(4): 33-38, 54.)
[25] 郭亚军, 庞义伟, 周家华, 等. ChatGPT赋能图书馆虚拟数字人: 技术优势、应用场景与实践路径[J/OL]. 图书馆论坛: 1-11[2024-06-15]. http://gfgga60aabc7d15084b00hvkvoqpoqu90p6xcn.fhaz.libproxy.ruc.edu.cn/kcms/ detail/44.1306.G2.20230706.0916.002.html. (GUO Y J, PANG Y W, ZHOU J H, et al. ChatGPT empowers virtual digital people in libraries: technical advantages, application scenarios and practical paths [J/OL]. Library forum, 1-11[2024-06-15]. http://gfgga60aabc7d15084b00hc0x6p9bf969f6ko9.fhaz.libproxy.ruc.edu.cn/kcms/detail/44.1306.G2.20230706.0916.002.html.)
[26] 第一财经. 专访何积丰院士: 达成可信的人工智能，最重要的支点在人[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://www.yicai.com/news/101112129.html. (FIRST FINANCIAL. Exclusive interview with academician He Jifeng: to achieve trustworthy artificial intelligence, the most important fulcrum is people [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://www.yicai.com/news/101112129.html.)
[27] CHOI W, STVILIA B. Web credibility assessment: conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(12): 2399-2414.
[28] HOVLAND C I, JANIS I L, KELLEY H H. Communication and persuasion [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.
[29] HILLIGOSS B, RIEH S Y. Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: construct, heuristics, and interaction in context[J]. Information processing & management, 2008, 44(4): 1467-1484.
[30] RIEH S Y, KIM Y M, YANG J Y, et al. A diary study of credibility assessment in everyday life information activities on the Web: preliminary findings[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 47(1): 1-10.
[31] 姜婷婷, 许艳闰, 傅诗婷, 等. 人智交互体验研究: 为人本人工智能发展注入新动力[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(4): 43-55. (JIANG T T, XU Y R, FU S T, et al. Research on human-intelligence interaction experience: injecting new impetus into the development of human-centered artificial intelligence[J]. Library and information knowledge, 2022, 39(4): 43-55.)
[32] FOGG B J, MARSHALL J, LARAKI O, et al. What makes web sites credible? a report on a large quantitative study[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2001: 61-68.
[33] SHNEIDERMAN B. Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems[J]. ACM transactions on interactive intelligent systems, 2020, 10(4): 1-31.
[34] 中国信息通信研究院. 人工智能生成内容(AIGC)白皮书[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202209/P020220902534520798735.pdf. (China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. White paper on artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202209/P020220902534520798735.pdf.)
[35] SHIN D. How do people judge the credibility of algorithmic sources?[J]. Ai & society, 2022: 1-16.
[36] 陈兵.生成式人工智能可信发展的法治基础[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2023, 38(4): 13-27. (CHEN B. The legal basis for the trustworthy development of generative artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (Rule of Law), 2023, 38(4): 13-27.)
[37] BUSUIOC M. Accountable artificial intelligence: holding algorithms to account[J]. Public administration review, 2021, 81(5): 825-836.
[38] MEHRABI N, MORSTATTER F, SAXENA N, et al. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning[J]. ACM computing surveys, 2021, 54(6): 1-35.
[39] EHSAN U, LIAO Q V, MULLER M, et al. Expanding explainability: towards social transparency in ai systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2021: 1-19.
[40] ERASMUS A, BRUNET T D P, FISHER E. What is interpretability?[J]. Philosophy & technology, 2021, 34(4): 833-862.
[41] STOKEL-WALKER C. AI chatbots are coming to search engines-can you trust the results?[J]. Nature, 2023, 620(7971): 258.
[42] SUN L, HUANG Y, WANG H, et al. Trustllm: trustworthiness in large language models[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05561, 2024.
[43] LIU Y, YAO Y, TON J F, et al. Trustworthy LLMs: a survey and guideline for evaluating large language models' alignment[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05374, 2023.
[44] ALGHAMDI E A, MASOUD R I, ALNUHAIT D, et al. AraTrust: an evaluation of trustworthiness for llms in Arabic[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09017, 2024.
[45] HONG J, DUAN J, ZHANG C, et al. Decoding compressed trust: scrutinizing the trustworthiness of efficient LLMs under compression[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15447, 2024.
[46] 吴丹, 孙国烨. 生成式智能搜索结果可信度研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2023, 49(6): 51-67. (WU D, SUN G Y. Research on the credibility of generative intelligent search results [J]. Journal of library science in China, 2023, 49(6): 51-67.)
[47] PARTADIREDJA R A, SERRANO C E, LJUBENKOV D. AI or human: the socio-ethical implications of AI-generated media content[C]//2020 13th CMI conference on cybersecurity and privacy (CMI)-digital transformation-potentials and challenges (51275). IEEE, 2020: 1-6.
[48] 李白杨, 白云, 詹希旎, 等. 人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的技术特征与形态演进[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(1): 66-74. (LI B Y, BAI Y, ZHAN X N, et al. Technical characteristics and morphological evolution of artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC)[J]. Library and information knowledge, 2023, 40(1): 66-74.)
[49] 金耀辉.可信赖大语言模型: 训练、推理及评测[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UZk67_Ir-iTSEqUY3H7ROA. (JIN Y H. Trustworthy large language model: training, reasoning and evaluation [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UZk67_Ir-iTSEqUY3H7ROA.)
[50] KHOO B, PHAN R C W, LIM C H. Deepfake attribution: on the source identification of artificially generated images[J]. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 2022, 12(3): e1438.
[51] ASKELL A, BAI Y, CHEN A, et al. A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00861, 2021.
[52] NAVIGLI R, CONIA S, ROSS B. Biases in large language models: origins, inventory and discussion[J]. ACM journal of data and information quality, 2023, 15(2): 1-21.
[53] MARCHANT A, HAWTON K, STEWART A, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: the good, the bad and the unknown[J]. Plos one, 2017, 12(8): e0181722.
[54] JAIN A, PATEL H, NAGALAPATTI L, et al. Overview and importance of data quality for machine learning tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 2020: 3561-3562.
[55] GUPTA N, MUJUMDAR S, PATEL H, et al. Data quality for machine learning tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 2021: 4040-4041.
[56] OUYANG L, WU J, JIANG X, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2022, 35: 27730-27744.
[57] GLAESE A, MCALEESE N, TRĘBACZ M, et al. Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14375, 2022.
[58] ZIEGLER D M, STIENNON N, WU J, et al. Fine-tuning language models from human preferences[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.08593, 2019.
[59] MENICK J, TREBACZ M, MIKULIK V, et al. Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotes[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11147, 2022.
[60] PERRIGO B. AI Chatbots are getting better. but an interview with chatgpt reveals their limits[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://time.com/6238781/chatbot-chatgpt-ai-interview/.
[61] LIU Z, LUO C, LU J. Hate speech in the internet context: unpacking the roles of internet penetration, online legal regulation, and online opinion polarization from a transnational perspective[J]. Information development, 2023, 39(1): 124-136.
[62] BOXELL L, GENTZKOW M, SHAPIRO J M. Is the internet causing political polarization? evidence from demographics[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017.
[63] BUBECK S, CHANDRASEKARAN V, ELDAN R, et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with gpt-4[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712, 2023.
[64] SANH V, WEBSON A, RAFFEL C, et al. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08207, 2021.
[65] ZHAO Z, GUO L, YUE T, et al. Chatbridge: bridging modalities with large language model as a language catalyst[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16103, 2023.
[66] ZHOU C, LIU P, XU P, et al. Lima: less is more for alignment[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2024, 36:.
[67] WANG Y, MISHRA S, Alipoormolabashi P, et al. Super-naturalinstructions: generalization via declarative instructions on 1600+ nlp tasks[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.07705, 2022.
[68] ABBAS A, TIRUMALA K, SIMIG D, et al. Semdedup: data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09540, 2023.
[69] LONGPRE S, YAUNEY G, REIF E, et al. A pretrainer's guide to training data: measuring the effects of data age, domain coverage, quality, & toxicity[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13169, 2023.
[70] CHOWDHERY A, NARANG S, DEVLIN J, et al. Palm: scaling language modeling with pathways[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311, 2022.
[71] RAE J W, BORGEAUD S, CAI T, et al. Scaling language models: methods, analysis & insights from training gopher[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446, 2021.
[72] TAY Y, DEHGHANI M, BAHRI D, et al. Efficient transformers: a survey[J]. ACM computing surveys, 2022, 55(6): 1-28.
[73] ZENG A, LIU X, DU Z, et al. Glm-130b: an open bilingual pre-trained model[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02414, 2022.
[74] VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]//Advances in neural information processing systems 30. Long Beach: Curran Associates, 2017: 5998-6008.
[75] BAI Y, JONES A, NDOUSSE K, et al. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05862, 2022.
[76] CHRISTIANO P F, LEIKE J, BROWN T, et al. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences[C]//Advances in neural information processing systems 30. Long Beach: Curran Associates, 2017: 4299-4307.
[77] GONEN H, IYER S, BLEVINS T, et al. Demystifying prompts in language models via perplexity estimation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04037, 2022.
[78] WEBER L, BRUNI E, HUPKES D. Mind the instructions: a holistic evaluation of consistency and interactions in prompt-based learning[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13486, 2023.
[79] CHUNG H W, HOU L, LONGPRE S, et al. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416, 2022.
[80] DONG H, XIONG W, GOYAL D, et al. Raft: reward ranked finetuning for generative foundation model alignment[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06767, 2023.
[81] BROWN T, MANN B, RYDER N, et al. Language models are few-shot learners[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020, 33: 1877-1901.
[82] OUYANG L, WU J, JIANG X, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2022, 35: 27730-27744.
[83] JOHNSON D, GOODMAN R, PATRINELY J, et al. Assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated medical responses: an evaluation of the Chat-GPT model[J]. Research square, 2023.
[84] TAN Y, MIN D, LI Y, et al. Evaluation of ChatGPT as a question answering system for answering complex questions[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07992, 2023.
[85] CHESNEY B, CITRON D. Deep fakes: a looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security[J]. California law review, 2019, 107: 1753.
[86] KHOO B, PHAN R C W, LIM C H. Deepfake attribution: on the source identification of artificially generated images[J]. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 2022, 12(3): e1438.
[87] SUZUKI J, ZEN H, KAZAWA H. Extracting representative subset from extensive text data for training pre-trained language models[J]. Information processing & management, 2023, 60(3): 103249.
[88] GUNASEKAR S, ZHANG Y, ANEJA J, et al. Textbooks are all you need[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11644, 2023.
[89] ALVAREZ-MELIS D, FUSI N. Dataset dynamics via gradient flows in probability space[C]//International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2021: 219-230.
[90] NGUYEN T, CHEN Z, LEE J. Dataset meta-learning from kernel ridge-regression[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00050, 2020.
[91] NGUYEN T, NOVAK R, XIAO L, et al. Dataset distillation with infinitely wide convolutional networks[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2021, 34: 5186-5198.
[92] 腾讯技术工程. 震撼科技界的GPT-4o发布首日即遭“越狱破防”[EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20240515A08AIA00. (TENCENT TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING. GPT-4o, which shocked the technology industry, was jailbroken on the first day of its release [EB/OL]. [2024-06-15]. https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20240515A08AIA00.)
[93] HONG G, GEMA A P, SAXENA R, et al. The hallucinations leaderboard: an open effort to measure hallucinations in large language models[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05904, 2024.
[94] LEE S, JONES-JANG S M, CHUNG M, et al. Who is using ChatGPT and why? extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model[J]. Information research an international electronic journal, 2024, 29(1): 54-72.
[95] 储节旺, 罗怡帆, 李佳轩. AIGC对信息生成方式及用户信息行为的影响[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(24): 13-23. (CHU J W, LUO Y F, LI J X. The impact of AIGC on information generation methods and user information behavior [J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(24): 13-23.)
[96] 杨俊, 谭丰隆, 陈婧. 从ChatGPT到“LibGPT”: 生成式人工智能驱动的新一代图书馆[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(9): 3-12. (YANG J, TAN F L, CHEN J. From ChatGPT to “LibGPT”: a new generation of libraries driven by generative artificial intelligence [J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(9): 3-12.)
