[1] TIM Y, PAN S L, RACTHAM P, et al. Digitally enabled disaster response: the emergence of social media as boundary objects in a flooding disaster[J]. Information systems journal, 2017, 27(2): 197-232.
[2] ZHANG C, FAN C, YAO W, et al. Social media for intelligent public information and warning in disasters: an interdisciplinary review[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 49: 190-207.
[3] SIMON T, GOLDBERG A, ADINI B. Socializing in emergencies-a review of the use of social media in emergency situations[J]. International journal of information management, 2015, 35(5): 609-619.
[4] 徐炀, 李虹. 虚拟逃生环境中视野范围和紧急程度对疏散效率的影响:从众行为的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 311-319. (XU Y, LI H. Influence of visibility range and degree of urgency on efficiency of evacuation: mediating effect of herding behavior[J]. Studies of psychology and behavior, 2015, 13(3): 311-319.)
[5] PIAN W, CHI J, MA F. The causes, impacts and countermeasures of covid-19“infodemic”: a systematic review using narrative synthesis[J]. Information processing & management, 2021, 58(6): 1-18.
[6] SUN H. A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology[J]. Mis quarterly, 2013, 37(4): 1013-1041.
[7] BERNHEIM B D. A theory of conformity[J]. Journal of political economy, 1994, 102(5): 841-877.
[8] 顾海娥. 网络社会突发公共事件的不确定性演化及其治理[J]. 江淮论坛, 2023(4): 109-114. (GU H E. Uncertainties evolution and governance of public emergencies in network society[J]. Jiang-huai tribune, 2023(4): 109-114.)
[9] 莫祖英, 王垲烁, 赵悦名. 社交媒体用户虚假信息从众传播行为影响模型实证研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2023, 44(1): 72-81. (MO Z M, WANG K L, ZHAO Y M. Empirical research on the influence model of social media users’ false information conformity spreading behavior[J]. Information and documentation services, 2023, 44(1): 72-81.)
[10] 张红, 任靖远, 刘晨阳, 等. 创造性产品评价中的从众效应[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(6): 688-698. (ZHANG H, REN J Y, LIU C Y, et al. Conformity effect of the evaluation of creative products[J]. Acta psychologica sinica, 2019, 51(6): 688-698.)
[11] 魏真瑜, 邓湘树, 赵治瀛. 亲社会行为中的从众效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 531-539. (WEI Z Y, DENG X S, ZHAO Z Y. The effect of conformity tendency on prosocial behaviors[J]. Advances in psychological science, 2021, 29(3): 531-539.)
[12] 曹芬芳, 张晋朝, 李力, 等. 施引文献视角下国外从众行为研究述评[J]. 情报科学, 2022, 40(3): 183-192. (CAO F F, ZHANG J C, LI L, et al. Research review of foreign herd behavior from the perspective of citing papers[J]. Information science, 2022, 40(3): 183-192.)
[13] 张坤, 查先进, 严亚兰. 从众健康信息转发行为影响因素的扎根探测——以新浪微博为例[J]. 图书与情报, 2022(2): 10-18. (ZHANG K, ZHA X J, YAN Y L. Grounded detection on influencing factors for herd forwarding behavior of health information: the case of Sina Weibo[J]. Library & information, 2022(2): 10-18.)
[14] 刘江, 朱庆华, 吴克文, 等. 网购用户从众行为影响因素实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(12): 138-143. (LIU J, ZHU Q H, WU K W, et al. An empirical study on factors affecting the conformity behavior of online shoppers[J]. Library and information service, 2012, 56(12): 138-143.)
[15] MATTKE J, MAIER C, REIS L, et al. Herd behavior in social media: the role of facebook likes, strength of ties, and expertise[J]. Information & management, 2020, 57(8) :1-16.
[16] 王天梅, 范峥, 孙宝文, 等. 网络群体性事件从众意向的影响因素研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(11): 1708-1717. (WANG T M, FAN Z, SUN B W, et al. The research of influencing factors of conformity intention in internet mass incidents[J]. Chinese journal of management, 2017, 14(11): 1708-1717.)
[17] 阳长征. 网络空间中情感扩散、信息级联与舆论偏差的内生影响效应研究——基于2015—2020年突发事件面板数据动态分析[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(5): 448-461. (YANG C Z. Emotion diffusion, information cascades, and internet opinion deviation: a dynamic analysis based on emergency events panel data from 2015 to 2020[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(5): 448-461.)
[18] 吴丹, 孙国烨. 迈向可解释的交互式人工智能：动因、途径及研究趋势[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 74(5): 16-28. (WU D, SUN G Y. Towards explainable interactive artificial intelligence: motivations, approaches, and research trends[J]. Wuhan University journal (philosophy & social science), 2021, 74(5): 16-28.)
[19] 查先进, 黄程松, 严亚兰. 从众信息搜索驱动因素的扎根分析——以微博热搜为例[J]. 图书与情报, 2022(2): 1-9. (ZHA X J, HUANG C S, YAN Y L. Grounded analysis on driving factors of herd information searching: the case of Weibo hot search[J]. Library & information, 2022(2)): 1-9.)
[20] 陆泽宇, 查先进, 严亚兰. 社交媒体环境下智能推荐内容点赞行为影响机理研究[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(2): 42-55. (LU Z Y, ZHA X J, YAN Y L. Research on influencing mechanism of intelligent recommendation content “like” behavior in the context of social media[J]. Journal of modern information, 2023, 43(2): 42-55.)
[21] 曹芬芳, 程静, 叶顺强, 等. 认知负荷视角下数字图书馆用户从众信息使用行为研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(2): 52-63. (CAO F F, CHENG J, YE S Q, et al. Research on user herd information use behavior in the context of digital library from the perspective of cognitive load[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(2): 52-63.)
[22] 莫祖英, 刘欢, 王垲烁, 等. 社交媒体用户虚假信息从众传播行为的影响因素差异性分析[J]. 情报科学, 2024, 42(2): 64-74. (MO Z Y, LIU H, WANG K S, et al. Analysis of differential influencing factors in social media users’ conformity behavior in spreading false information[J]. Information science, 2024, 42(2): 64-74.
[23] 张坤, 李力. 社交媒体用户从众信息分享行为影响机理研究：三度归因理论视角[J]. 情报资料工作, 2022, 43(6): 58-67. (ZHANG K, LI L. Research on the influence mechanism of social media users’ herd information sharing behavior: from the perspective of triple attribution theory[J]. Information and documentation services, 2022, 43(6): 58-67.)
[24] 查先进, 张坤, 严亚兰. 在线学习平台从众选择行为形成机理的扎根分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(2): 90-98. (ZHA X J, ZHANG K, YAN Y L. The grounded analysis of the formation mechanism of herd choice behaviors on online learning platforms[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(2): 90-98.)
[25] 王贇芝, 王雪, 查先进. 弹幕视频网站用户从众信息评论行为驱动因素探索[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10(4): 60-69. (WANG Y Z, WANG X, ZHA X J. Exploring driving factors of herd information comment behavior of bullet screen video websites’ users[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2020, 10(4): 60-69.)
[26] 曹芬芳, 李爱民, 叶艳, 等. 信息瀑布和连接强度视角下从众信息转发行为感知差异比较研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2024, 41(1): 108-120. (CAO F F, LI A M, YE Y, et al. A comparative study on the perceived difference of herd information retweeting behavior from the perspective of information cascades and tie strengths[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2024, 41(1): 108-120.)
[27] 王雪. 不同社会连接强度下微信朋友圈从众信息转发意愿研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2020. (WANG X. Study on herd information forwarding intention in WeChat moments with different strength of social ties[D].Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2020.)
[28] 李峰, 沈惠璋, 张聪. 我国危机事件下从众意向模型——基于fishbein合理行为模型的修正研究[J]. 管理学报, 2012, 9(3): 451-458. (LI F, SHEN H Z, ZHANG C. Herd behavior intention model in crisis in China: an amendment study on fishbein’s theory of reasoned action[J]. Chinese journal of management, 2012, 9(3): 451-458.)
[29] 张玉亮, 赵玉莹. 突发事件中网民信息异化模仿行为的类型及发生机理研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(3): 136-142. (ZHANG Y L, ZHAO Y Y. A study on the types and mechanitation behavior of Internet users’ information alienation in emergencies[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2024, 43(3): 136-142.)
[30] 李玥琪, 王晰巍, 王楠阿雪, 等. 突发事件下社交媒体网络舆情风险识别及预警模型研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(10): 1085-1099. (LI Y Q, WANG X W, WANG N A X, et al. Risk identification and early warning model of social media network public opinion in emergencies[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(10): 1085-1099.)
[31] 李沁雨, 岳泉, 袁勤俭. 社会学习理论及其在信息系统研究领域的应用与展望[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(9): 154-160. (LI Q Y, YUE Q, YUAN Q J. Social learning theory and its application and prospect in the field of information system research[J]. Journal of modern information, 2022, 42(9): 154-160.)
[32] 张薇薇, 朱杰, 蒋雪. 社会学习对专业虚拟社区不同类型用户知识贡献行为的影响研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2021, 42(5): 94-103. (ZHANG W W, ZHU J, JIANG X. Research on the impact of social learning on the knowledge contribution behavior of different types of users in professional virtual communities[J]. Information and documentation services, 2021, 42(5): 94-103.)
[33] 杨立华, 李凯林. 公共管理混合研究方法的基本路径[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2019(6): 36-46. (YANG L H, LI K L. The basic approaches of mixed research methods in public administration[J]. Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 2019(6): 36-46.)
[34] 王芳, 祝娜, 翟羽佳. 我国情报学研究中混合方法的应用及其领域分布分析[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(11): 1119-1129. (WANG F, ZHU N, ZHAI Y J. Application of mixed methods and their field distribution in information science research in China[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2017, 36(11): 1119-1129.)
[35] 原长弘, 王瑞琪. 用顺序混合方法研究构建验证管理理论探析[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(5): 80-86. (YUAN C H, WANG R Q. A research on building and testing management theory with the sequential mixed method[J]. Science research management, 2015, 36(5): 80-86.)
[36] KETCHEN D J, THOMAS J B, SNOW C C. Organizational configurations and performance: a comparison of theoretical approaches[J]. Academy of management journal, 1993, 36(6): 1278-1313.
[37] PAPPAS I O, WOODSIDE A G. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing[J]. International journal of information management, 2021, 58: 1-16.
[38] OLYA H G T, AKHSHIK A. Tackling the complexity of the pro-environmental behavior intentions of visitors to turtle sites[J]. Journal of travel research, 2019, 58(2): 313-332.
[39] FASSINGER R E. Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: grounded theory in counseling psychology research[J]. Journal of counseling psychology, 2005, 52(2): 156-166.
[40] HENNINK M, KAISER B N. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests[J]. Social science & medicine, 2022, 292:1-10.
[41] JIN F, ZHANG X. Artificial intelligence or human: when and why consumers prefer ai recommendations[J]. Information technology & people, 2023, 36(4): 1234-1258.
[42] DOGRUEL L, FACCIORUSSO D, STARK B. “ ‘I’m still the master of the machine.” Internet users’ awareness of algorithmic decision-making and their perception of its effect on their autonomy[J]. Information communication & society, 2022, 25(9): 1311-1332.
[43] ARMENTANO M G, ABALDE R, SCHIAFFINO S, et al. User acceptance of recommender systems: influence of the preference elicitation algorithm[C]//2014 9th international workshop on semantic and social media adaptation and personalization. Buenos Aires: IEEE, 2014: 72-76.
[44] CASTELO N, BOS M W, LEHMANN D R. Task-dependent algorithm aversion[J]. Journal of marketing research, 2019, 56(5): 809-825.
[45] MAHMUD H, ISLAM A K M N, MITRA R K. What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2023, 193:1-16.
[46] XIE X, DU Y, BAI Q. Why do people resist algorithms? From the perspective of short video usage motivations[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2022, 13:1-12.
[47] 王馨笛, 赵宇翔. 健康app适老化设计对老龄用户价值实现及主观幸福感的影响研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2023, 44(2): 31-41. (WANG X D, ZHAO Y X. Research on the influence of health app suitable aging design on the value realization and subjective well-being of elderly users[J]. Information and documentation services, 2023, 44(2): 31-41.)
[48] YOO J, CHOI S, CHOI M, et al. Why people use twitter: social conformity and social value perspectives[J]. Online information review, 2014, 38(2): 265-283.
[49] 郑春东, 刘宁, 冯楠, 等. 重大公共威胁情境下个体亲社会行为形成机制——以新冠疫情为例[J]. 管理科学学报, 2021, 24(3): 63-79. (ZHENG C D, LIU N, FENG N, et al. Generating mechanism of individual prosocial behavior in the context of major public threats: a case of the novel coronavirus epidem[J]. Journal of management sciences in China, 2021, 24(3): 63-79.)
[50] 徐海琴. 在线社会化商务情境下消费者冲动购买行为研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2020. (XU H Q. Consumers’impulsive purchasing behavior in online social commerce[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2020.)
[51] 查先进, 李力, 严亚兰, 等. 数字图书馆环境下信息有用性和信息获取影响因素研究——信息获取自我效能的调节效果[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(7): 669-681. (CHA X J, LI L, YAN Y L, et al. Research on impacting factors of information usefulness and information acquisition in the context of digital libraries: the moderating effect of self-efficacy in acquiring information[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2017, 36(7): 669-681.)
[52] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(qca): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167. (DU Y Z, JIA L D. Configuration perspective and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): a new way of management research[J]. Journal of management world, 2017(6): 155-167.)
[53] FISS P C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2): 393-420.
[54] 池毛毛, 杜运周, 王伟军. 组态视角与定性比较分析方法：图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(4): 424-434. (CHI M M, DU Y Z, WANG W I. Configurational perspective and qualitative comparative analysis: the new way of empirical research in library and information science[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(4): 424-434.)
[55] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中qca方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323. (ZHANG M, DU Y Z. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in management and organization research: position, tactics, and directions[J]. Chinese journal of management, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.)
[56] SHIN D, ZHONG B, BIOCCA F A. Beyond user experience: what constitutes algorithmic experiences? [J]. International journal of information management, 2020, 52: 1-11.
[57] YOU S, YANG C L, LI X. Algorithmic versus human advice: does presenting prediction performance matter for algorithm appreciation? [J]. Journal of management information systems, 2022, 39(2): 336-365.
[58] 范梓腾, 宁晶, 魏娜. 社交媒体用户的算法推荐内容接受度研究[J]. 电子政务, 2021(7): 113-124. (FAN Z T, NING J, WEI N. Research on social media users’ acceptance of algorithmic recommendation content[J]. E-government, 2021(7): 113-124.)
[59] 罗映宇, 朱国玮, 钱无忌, 等. 人工智能时代的算法厌恶：研究框架与未来展望[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(10): 205-233. (LUO Y Y, ZHU G W, QIAN W J, et al. Algorithm aversion in the era of artificial intelligence: research framework and future agenda[J]. Journal of management world, 2023, 39(10): 205-233.)
[60] ETTLINGER N. Algorithmic affordances for productive resistance[J]. Big data & society, 2018, 5(1): 1-13.
[61] HSIAO C, CHIOU J. The impact of online community position on online game continuance intention: do game knowledge and community size matter? [J]. Information & management, 2012, 49(6): 292-300.
[62] 池毛毛, 王俊晶, 王伟军, 等. 基于用户抵制理论的共享住宿平台用户不持续使用意愿——一项混合方法研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2024, 41(4): 134-145. (CHI M M, WANG J J, WANG W J, et al. Users’ discontinuance intention in sharing accommodation platforms based on user resistance theory: a mixed method study[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2024, 41(4): 134-145.
[63] 刘倩, 王君丽, 张聪. 基于elm-utaut模型的阅读推广类短视频采纳行为研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2024(1): 28-35. (LIU Q, WANG J L, ZHANG C. Research on adoption behavior of reading promotion short videos based on elm-utaut model[J]. Library theory and practice, 2024(1): 28-35.)
