[1] FABRE R, EGRET D, SCHÖPFEL J, et al. Evaluating the scientific impact of research infrastructures: the role of current research information systems[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2021, 2(1): 42-64.
[2] SÖDERSTRÖM K R, ÅSTRÖM F, HALLONSTEN O. Generic instruments in a synchrotron radiation facility[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2022, 3(2): 420-442.
[3] 《重大科技基础设施的产出及影响分析》研究组. 重大科技基础设施的产出及影响分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.(The research team on the output and impact analysis of large research infrastructure. Analysis of the output and impact of large research infrastructure[M]. Beijing: China Science Publishing & Media, 2021.)
[4] 王贻芳. 中国重大科技基础设施的现状和未来发展[J]. 科技导报, 2023, 41(4): 5-13. (WANG Y F. Current status and future prospects of the national major infrastructure for science and technology[J]. Science & technology review, 2023, 41(4): 5-13.)
[5] ROSENBERG N. Scientific instrumentation and university research[J]. Research policy, 1992, 21(4): 381-390.
[6] JOERGES B, SHINN T. Instrumentation between science, state and industry[M]. Dordrecht: Springer, 2001.
[7] HENTSCHEL K. A periodization of research technologies and of the emergency of genericity[J]. Studies in history and philosophy of science Part B: studies in history and philosophy of modern physics, 2015, 52: 223-233.
[8] GRIBBE J, HALLONSTEN O. The emergence and growth of materials science in Swedish universities[J]. Historical studies in the natural sciences, 2017, 47(4): 459-493.
[9] 韩正琪, 刘小平, 徐涵. 基于Rao-Stirling指数的学科交叉文献发现——以纳米科学与纳米技术为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(1): 125-131. (HAN Z Q, LIU X P, XU H. Interdisciplinary literature discovery based on Rao-Stirling diversity indices: case studies in nanoscience and nanotechnology[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(1): 125-131.)
[10] ZHANG L, LEYDESDORFF L. The scientometric measurement of interdisciplinarity and diversity in the research portfolios of Chinese universities[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2021, 6(4): 13-35.
[11] LEIBEL C, BORNMANN L. What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(1): 601-639.
[12] 汪雪锋, 于慧妍, 郑思佳, 等. 学术论文创新质量评价研究——以多能干细胞技术为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(5): 127-138. (WANG X F, YU H Y, ZHENG S J, et al. Research on innovation quality evaluation of academic papers: a case study in the field of pluripotent stem cells[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2024, 8(5): 127-138.)
[12] 杨建林, 钱玲飞. 基于关键词对逆文档频率的主题新颖度度量方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(3): 99-102. (YANG J L, Qian L F. Topic novelty measurement based on inverse document frequency of keyword pairs [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2013, 36(3): 99-102.)
[14] 孔德婧, 董放, 陈子婧, 等. 离群专利视角下的新兴技术预测——基于BERT模型和深度神经网络[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(17): 131-141. (KONG D J, DONG F, CHEN Z J, et al. Prediction of emerging technologies from the perspective of outlier patents: based on bert model and deep neural networks[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(17): 131-141.)
[15] ARTHUR W B. The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves[M]. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2009.
[16] UZZI B, MUKHERJEE S, STRINGER M, et al. A typical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
[17] WAGNER K, BYRD G. Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical medical librarian programs: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Journal of the medical library association, 2012, 100(4): 14-33.
[18] LEAHEY E, BECKMAN C M, STANKO T L. Prominent but less productive: the impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2017, 62(1): 105-139.
[19] 迟培娟, 丁洁兰, 冷伏海. 突破性论文的三元计量特征及识别研究——以生物医学领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(7): 663-675. (CHI P J, DING J L, LENG F H. Characteristics of the technology impact of breakthrough papers in biology and medicine[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(7): 663-675.)
[20] HEFFERNAN K, TEUFEL S. Identifying problems and solutions in scientific text [J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(2): 1367-1382.
[21] WANG J, VEUGELERS R, STEPHAN P. Bias against novelty in science: a cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators[J]. Research policy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-1436.
[22] SHIBAYAMA S, YIN D, MATSUMOTO K. Measuring novelty in science with word embedding [J]. PLoS one, 2021, 16(7): e0254034
[23] 罗卓然, 陆伟, 蔡乐, 等. 学术文本词汇功能识别——在论文新颖性度量上的应用[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(7): 720-732. (LUO Z R, LU W, CAI L, et al. Application of lexical functions in novelty measurement of academic papers[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(7): 720-732.)
[24] 钱佳佳, 罗卓然, 陆伟. 基于问题—方法组合的科技论文新颖性度量与创新类型识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(14): 82-89. (QIAN J J, LUO Z R, LU W. Novelty measurement and innovation type identification of scientific literature based on question-method combination[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(14): 82-89.)
[25] FUNK R J, OWEN-SMITH J. A dynamic network measure of technological change [J]. Management science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817.
[26] WU L, WANG D, EVANS J A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology [J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744): 378-382.
[27] BORNMANN L, TEKLES A. Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts [J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(3): 101-159.
[28] BU Y, WALTMAN L, HUANG Y. A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications [J]. Quantitative science studies, 2021, 2(1): 155-183.
[29] 刘佳程, 马廷灿, 岳名亮. 融合创新性与影响力的论文代表作遴选方法研究[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(4): 88-98. (LIU J C, MA T C, YUE M L. Selection method of representative papers that integrates innovation and influence[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2024, 8(4): 88-98.)
[30] BORNMANN L, DANIEL H. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior[J]. Journal of documentation, 2008, 64(1): 45-80.
[31] WALTMAN, L. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2016, 10(2): 365-391.
[32] Incites[EB/OL]. [2023-01-28]. https://clarivate.com.cn/products/incites/.
[33] 宋丽萍, 王建芳. 基于学科规范引文影响力与同行评议相关性的科学评价实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(18): 122-128. (SONG L P, WANG J F. An empirical study of scientific evaluation based on the correlation between CNCI and peer review[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(18): 122-128.)
[34] HIRSCH J E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
[35] YANG A J, WU L, ZHANG Q, et al. The k-step h-index in citation networks at the paper, author, and institution levels[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2023, 17(4): 101456.
[36] ZHAI L, YAN X, ZHANG G. The bi-directional h-index and b-core decomposition in directed networks[J]. Physica A: statistical mechanics and its applications, 2019, 531: 121715.
[37] BAO P, WANG J. Identifying your representative work based on credit allocation[C]//WWW’18: companion proceedings of the the web conference 2018. Lyon: ACM Press, 2018: 5-6.
[38] CHEN P, XIE H, MASLOV S, et al. Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2007, 1(1): 8-15.
[39] BAI X, ZHANG F, LIU J, et al. Quantifying the impact of scientific collaboration and papers via motif-based heterogeneous networks[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2023, 17(2): 101397.
[40] YIN Y. Essays on the science of science and innovation [D]. Evanston: Northwestern University, 2023.
[41] 张雪, 张志强, 陈秀娟, 等. 合成生物学领域的基础研究与技术创新关联分析[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(3): 231-242. (ZHANG X, ZHANG Z Q, CHEN X J, et al. Correlation analysis of basic research and technological innovation in synthetic biology[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(3): 231-242.)
[42] 石丽, 秦萍, 李小涛. 高被引论文的跨学科性与Altmetrics指标相关性分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(5): 60-65, 91. (SHI L, QIN P, LI X T. Analysis on relationship between interdisciplinarity and altmetrics indicators of highly cited papers[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2021, 44(5): 60-65, 91.)
[43] CHEN S, QIU J, ARSENAULT C, et al. Exploring the interdisciplinarity patterns of highly cited papers[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15: 101124.
[44] OKAMURA K. Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism[J]. Palgrave communications, 2019, 5: 141.
[45] 刘嘉明, 孙建军. 参考文献跨学科性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(5): 525-536. (LIU J M, SUN J J. Research on the relationship between interdisciplinarity of references and academic influence[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2023, 42(5): 525-536.)
[46]PONOMAREV I V, LAWTON B K, WILLIAMS D E, et al. Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0: can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction? [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(3): 755-65.
[47] SOLEIL Synchrotron. Research interdisciplinarity and results[EB/OL]. [2024-06-19]. https://wwwpreprod.synchrotron-soleil.fr/en/file/7272.
[48] 张玲玲, 王蝶, 张利斌. 跨学科性与团队合作对大科学装置科学效益的影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(12): 199-212. (ZHANG L L, WANG D, ZHANG L B. Research of the influence of interdisciplinarity and team cooperation on the scientific effects based on large-scale scientific facilities[J]. Journal of management world, 2019, 35(12): 199-212.)
[49] CHEN S, GUO Y, DING A S, et al. Is interdisciplinarity more likely to produce novel or disruptive research?[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(5): 2615-32.
[50] 吕冬晴, 阮选敏, 李江, 等. 跨学科知识融合对D指数的影响[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(3): 263-274. (LVU D Q, RUAN X M, LI J, et al. Research on the relationship between the interdisciplinarity and radicalness of papers from the perspective of knowledge integration[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(3): 263-274.)
[51] FONTANA M, IORI M, MONTOBBIO F, et al. New and atypical combinations: An assessment of novelty and interdisciplinarity[J]. Research policy, 2020, 49(7): 104063.
[52] The Advanced Photon Source. APS publications[EB/OL]. [2024-06-09]. https://www.aps.anl.gov/Science/Publications.
[53] The European Synchrotron. ESRF publications[EB/OL]. [2024-06-10]. https://www.esrf.fr/UsersAndScience/Publications.
[54] BORNMANN L, TEKLES A. Disruption index depends on length of citation window[J]. El profesional de la información, 2019, 28(2): e280207.
[55] PORTER A L, CHUBIN D E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics[J]. 1985, 8(3/4): 161-176.
[56] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 87-100.
[57] HAMERS L, HEMERYCK Y, HERWEYERS G, et al. Similarity measures in scientometric research-the Jaccard index versus salton cosine formula[J]. Information processing & management, 1989, 25(3): 315-318.
[58] LEYDESDORFF L, WAGNER C S, BORNMANN L. Diversity measurement: steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(3): 904-905.
[59] LEYDESDORFF L, WAGNER C S, BORNMANN L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-stirling diversity, relative variety, and the gini coefficient[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 255-269.
[60] STIRLING A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and societyt[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
[61] LEYDESDORFF L. Diversity measures[EB/OL]. [2024-06-19]. http://www.leydesdorff.net/software.
[62] BITTMANN F, TEKLES A, BORNMANN L. Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: the comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2021, 2: 1246-1270.
[63] VIEIRA E S, GOMES J A N F. Citations to scientific articles: its distribution and dependence on the article features[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(1): 1-13.
[64] 陶立方, 杜利民. 文后参考文献数量与影响因子的关系探究[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 43(1): 115-120. (TAO L F, DU L M. Research on the relationship between the number of references and the impact factor[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (natural sciences edition), 2020, 43(1): 115-120.)
[65] CARD D, DELLAVIGNA S. Page limits on economics articles: evidence from two journals[J]. Journal of economic perspectives, 2014, 28(3): 149-168.
[66] SUGIMOTO C R, NI C, RUSSELL T G, et al. Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: an examination of dissertation networks in library and information science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(9): 1808-1828.
[67] JONES B F, WUCHTY S, UZZI B. Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5905): 1259-62.
[68] SCHMITT J B, GOLDMANN A, SIMON S T, et al. Conception and interpretation of interdisciplinarity in research practice: findings from group discussions in the emerging field of digital transformation[J]. Minerva, 2023, 61(2): 199-220.
