[1] 国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于完善科技成果评价机制的指导意见[EB/OL].[2024-05-01].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2021/content_5631817.htm.(The General Office of the State Council.Guiding Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Improving the Evaluation Mechanism of Scientific and Technological Achievements[EB/OL].[2024-05-01].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2021/content_5631817.htm.)
[2] 李正风, 阎妍, 武晨箫.学术评价破“五唯”与科学共同体的责任[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(10): 17-28.(LI Z F, YAN Y, WU C X.Breaking the “Five-only” in academic evaluation and the responsibility of the science community[J].Science of science and management of S.&.T, 2022, 43(10): 17-28.)
[3] 苏新宁, 王东波.学术评价相关问题与思考[J].信息资源管理学报, 2018, 8(3): 4-11.(SU X N, WANG D B.Related questions and thoughts of academic evaluation[J].Journal of information resources management, 2018, 8(3): 4-11.)
[4] 邓三鸿, 杨杰, 王昊, 等.多源异构数据视角下的学术评价:内涵、进展与展望[J].科技情报研究, 2023, 5(4): 42-56.(DENG S H, YANG J, WANG H, et al.Academic evaluation from the perspective of multi-source heterogeneous data:connotation, status and prospect [J].Scientific information research, 2023, 5(4): 42-56.)
[5] 沈小玲, 徐勇, 严卫中.基于网络文献计量的科技论文学术影响力综合评价研究[J].图书情报工作, 2013, 57(21): 95-103.(SHEN X L, XU Y, YAN W Z.Empirical research on network comprehensive evaluation of academic influence of sci-tech papers[J].Library and information service, 2013, 57(21): 95-103.)
[6] 孙志茹, 张志强.基于知识运用理论的学术研究政策影响力评价框架研究[J].图书情报工作, 2013, 57(8): 40-45.(SUN Z R, ZHANG Z Q.Evaluation framework for policy influence of academic research based on knowledge utilization theory[J].Library and information service, 2013, 57(8): 40-45.)
[7] BOZEMAN B, YOUTIE J.Socio-economic impacts and public value of government-funded research: lessons from four US national science foundation initiatives[J].Research policy, 2017, 46(8): 1387-1398.
[8] SALTER A J, MARTIN B R.The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review[J].Research policy, 2001, 30(3): 509-532.
[9] 曾燕, 昝婷婷, 杨晓, 等.科技成果的文化影响概念框架与REF2021案例研究[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(5): 139-150.(ZENG Y, ZAN T T, YANG X, et al.Conceptual framework for cultural impacts of scientific research and REF2021 cases[J].Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2024, 8(5): 139-150.)
[10] 姜春林, 郭琪琴, 张光耀.人文社科学术著作评价指标体系构建及实证研究[J].情报杂志, 2022, 41(2): 198-207.(JIANG C L, GUO Q Q, ZHANG G Y.Construction and empirical study of evaluation indicators system for chinese academic books in humanities and social sciences[J].Journal of intelligence, 2022, 41(2): 198-207.)
[11] 韩松涛, 李洁, 金佳丽, 等.基于关联重言的人文社科期刊评价量化模型探索[J].情报学报, 2023, 42(6): 702-710.(HAN S T, LI J, JIN J L, et al.Quantitative evaluation model for humanities and social sciences journals based on association tautology [J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2023, 42(6): 702-710.)
[12] 袁曦临, 刘宇.人文社会科学评价的复杂性与引文评价指标的修正[J].图书情报工作, 2010, 54(14): 24-27, 96.(YUAN X L, LIU Y.Comment on the essence and complexity of humanity social sciences evaluation[J].Library and information service, 2010, 54(14): 24-27, 96.)
[13] 马海群, 韩娜, 张春春.社会科学应用成果评价体系构建研究[J].情报资料工作, 2022, 43(4): 44-51.(MA H Q, HAN N, ZHANG C C.A probe into the evaluation system construction of social sciences application achievements[J].Information and documentation services, 2022, 43(4): 44-51.)
[14] 郭红梅, 何苗, 邢星, 等.不同自然科学门类间论文学术影响力多指标综合评价的合理性研究[J].图书情报工作, 2012, 56(22): 62-68.(GUO H M, HE M, XING X, et al.The construction of the comprehensive evaluation system and its feasible study on the academic influence of papers across natural scientific disciplines[J].Library and information service, 2012, 56(22): 62-68.)
[15] 顾东蕾.生物信息学学术期刊评价[J].中华医学图书情报杂志, 2009, 18(4): 72-76.(GU D L.Evaluation of academic bioinformatics journals[J].Chinese journal of medical library and information science, 2009, 18(4): 72-76.)
[16] 王颖婕, 柳卸林, 王雪璐, 等.科研项目学术价值评价及影响因素研究[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(3): 409-417.(WANG Y J, LIU X L, WANG X L, et al.Gender disparities in academic commercialization and its influencing factors[J].Studies in science of science, 2020, 38(3): 409-417.)
[17] PRAUS P.HCR for assessment of scientific journals in chemistry[J].Scientometrics, 2020, 122(2): 1237-1242.
[18] 杨冠灿, 刘彤, 李纲, 等.基于综合引用网络的专利价值评价研究[J].情报学报, 2013, 32(12): 1265-1277.(YANG G C, LIU T, LI G, et al.Research on patent value evaluation based on comprehensive citation network[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2013, 32(12): 1265-1277.)
[19] 伊惠芳, 吴红, 马永新, 等.改进的柔性专利价值评价方法——基于时域-领域双重视角[J].情报杂志, 2019, 38(3): 53-60.(YI H F, WU H, MA Y X, et al.Improved flexible patent value evaluation method——based on the dual perspective of time domain and technology field[J].Journal of intelligence, 2019, 38(3): 53-60.)
[20] 康旭东, 邓乐乐, 王宇开, 等.基于全代引证的专利累积影响力评价——一个诺奖得主专利的案例研究[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(3): 267-277.(KANG X L, DENG L L, WANG Y K, et al.Evaluation of patents cumulative impact based on all generations of citations: a case study of a nobel prize winner’s patents[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(3): 267-277.)
[21] 孙明汉, 江曼, 朱秀珠.基于影响域和活跃度的专利即时影响力评价——以基因工程领域为例[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(4): 159-166.(SUN M H, JIANG M, ZHU X Z.Patent current impact index based on domain of influence and activity: a case study in genetic engineering[J].Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(4): 159-166.)
[22] 郭凤娇, 赵蓉英, 孙劭敏.基于科学交流过程的学术论文影响力评价研究——以中国社会科学国际学术论文为例[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(4): 357-366.(GUO F J, ZHAO R Y, SUN S M.Evaluation of academic papers impact based on scientific communication path: a case study of chinese international academic papers in social sciences [J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(4): 357-366.)
[23] 牌艳欣, 周彦廷.生态位理论视角下学术论文影响力评价研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(12): 119-127, 145.(PAI Y X, ZHOU Y T.Research on impact evaluation of academic papers from the perspective of niche theory[J].Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(12): 119-127, 145.)
[24] 许鑫, 叶丁菱.多维影响力融合视域下的数据论文评价研究[J].情报学报, 2022, 41(3): 275-286.(XU X, YE D L.Evaluation of data papers from the perspective of multi-dimensional influence fusion[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(3): 275-286.)
[25] 张玉, 潘云涛, 袁军鹏, 等.论多维视角下中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系的构建[J].图书情报工作, 2015, 59(7): 69-76.(ZHANG Y, PAN Y T, YUAN J P, et al.The construction of academic impact evaluation system of sci-tech books in china under multiple dimensions[J].Library and information service, 2015, 59(7): 69-76.)
[26] 章成志, 童甜甜, 周清清.整合不同评论平台的图书综合影响力评价研究[J].情报学报, 2018, 37(9): 861-873.(ZHANG C Z, TONG T T, ZHOU Q Q.Combing multiple platforms of online reviews to measure the comprehensive impact of books[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018, 37(9): 861-873.)
[27] 熊霞.基于PlumX的外文学术图书影响力评价实证研究[J].四川图书馆学报, 2021(3): 34-40.(XIONG X.Empirical research on the evaluation of foreign academic book impact based on PlumX[J].Journal of the library science society of Sichuan, 2021(3): 34-40.)
[28] 王萝娜, 李端明.运用加权TOPSIS法的学术图书影响力评价方法研究[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(23): 72-77.(WANG L N, LI D M.Research on the evaluation method of academic book influence using weighted TOPSIS method[J].Library and information service, 2018, 62(23): 72-77.)
[29] 朱富成, 刘永.利用政策关联度指标进行学术影响力研究——以疫情防控档案政策关联度为例[J].图书情报工作, 2023, 67(14): 62-72.(ZHU F C, LIU Y.Discussion on academic influence of analysis of policy related degree index of our country: a case study of the correlation degree of epidemic prevention and control archives policies[J].Library and information service, 2023, 67(14): 62-72.)
[30] 翟姗姗, 叶丁菱, 胡畔, 等.融合Altmetrics与引文分析的数据论文学术影响力评价[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(7): 710-718.(ZHAI S S, YE D L, HU P, et al.Evaluation of the academic impact of data papers fused with altmetrics and citation analysis[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(7): 710-718.)
[31] 王菲菲, 弋新月, 贾晨冉, 等.Altmetrics视角下科技文献学术影响力动态评价体系构建与实证研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2020, 43(8): 77-83.(WANG F F, YI X Y, JIA C R, et al.Construction and empirical research on dynamic evaluation system of academic influence of scientific literature from the perspective of altmetrics[J].Information studies: theory & application, 2020, 43(8): 77-83.)
[32] 何春建.单篇论文学术影响力评价指标构建[J].图书情报工作, 2017, 61(4): 98-107.(HE C J.Study on the evaluation indicators of single article academic impact[J].Library and information service, 2017, 61(4): 98-107.)
[33] 曾粤亮, 郑汉, 杨思洛.人文科学研究成果的社会影响探析——以REF案例为样本[J].情报学报, 2023, 42(7): 842-856.(ZENG Y L, ZHENG H, YANG S L.Societal impact indicators of research outcomes in humanities based on REF case studies[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2023, 42(7): 842-856.)
[34] 陈芳, 杨建林.科研成果社会影响力评价研究——评价方法视角下的解读[J].现代情报, 2021, 41(11): 111-119.(CHEN F, YANG J L.The societal impact evaluation on scientific research achievements: interpretation from the perspective of evaluation method[J].Journal of modern information, 2021, 41(11): 111-119.)
[35] GUBA E G, LINCOLN Y S.Fourth generation evaluation[M].New York: Sage Publications, Inc, 1989.
[36] 古贝, 林肯.第四代评估[M].秦林, 蒋爱玲, 译.北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 24-30.(GUBA E G, LINCOLN Y S.Fourth generation evaluation[M].QIN L, JIANG A L, trans.Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2008: 24-30.)
[37] 张民选.回应、协商与共同建构——“第四代评价理论”评述[J].外国教育资料, 1995(3): 53-59.(ZHANG M X.Response, negotiation and co-construction: a review of the fourth generation of evaluation theory[J].Global Education, 1995(3): 53-59.)
[38] 温萍.论“第四代评价理论”对我国本科教学评估的启示[J].中国成人教育, 2010(17): 135-136.(WEN P.The implications of the fourth generation evaluation theory for undergraduate teaching evaluation in China[J].China adult education, 2010(17): 135-136.)
[39] 刘佳.第四代评价理论视阈下高校教学评价制度的反思与重建[J].教育发展研究, 2015, 35(17): 56-61.(LIU J.On higher education assessment system in the perspective of the fourth assessment theory[J].Research in educational development, 2015, 35(17): 56-61.)
[40] 方向阳.基于第四代评价理论的高职院校创业实践评价[J].教育与职业, 2015(14): 74-75.(FANG X Y.Evaluation of entrepreneurial practices in higher education institutions based on fourth generation evaluation theory[J].Education and vocation, 2015(14): 74-75.)
[41] 孙科技, 朱益明.“双一流”建设评估的现实困境及其超越:第四代评估理论视角[J].复旦教育论坛, 2021, 19(4): 100-106.(SUN K J, ZHU Y M.The realistic dilemma and transcendence of “double first-class” construction evaluation: from the perspective of the fourth generation evaluation theory[J].Fudan education forum, 2021, 19(4): 100-106.)
[42] 杨彩菊.第四代评价理论下高职学生学习评价反思[J].职业技术教育, 2015, 36(13): 39-43.(YANG C J.Reflection on student learning evaluation of higher vocational education in the view of the fourth generation evaluation theory[J].Vocational and technical education, 2015, 36(13): 39-43.)
[43] 周香均, 罗志敏.关于研究生综合素质测评的思考——基于第四代评价理论[J].教育探索, 2016(3): 95-99.(ZHOU X J, LUO Z M.Reflections on comprehensive quality assessment of graduate students: based on the fourth generation evaluation theory[J].Education exploration, 2016(3): 95-99.)
[44] 中华人民共和国教育部.国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[EB/OL].[2024-01-02].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201008/t20100802_93704.html.(Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.Outline of the National Medium- and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Plan (2010-2020) [EB/OL].[2024-01-02].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201008/t20100802_93704.html.)
[45] 陈秋媛, 李想.第四代教育评价理论视角下的博士研究生学术创新成果综合评价——以北京大学为例[J].北京教育(高教), 2022(4): 18-20.(CHEN Q Y, LI X.Fourth generation educational evaluation theory perspective comprehensive evaluation of academic innovation achievements of doctoral students——taking Peking University as an example[J].Beijing education, 2022(4): 18-20.)
[46] 郭瑞, 杨天通.高校智库评价指标体系的构建及实证研究——基于第四代评估理论视角[J].智库理论与实践, 2021, 6(5): 33-44.(GUO R, YANG T T.Construction and empirical research of evaluation index system of university think tank: based on the perspective of the fourth generation evaluation theory[J].Think tank: theory & practice, 2021, 6(5): 33-44.)
[47] 文雯, 李雪, 王晶.第四代评估理论视角下的研究生项目评估[J].高等工程教育研究, 2015(3): 108-113.(WEN W, LI X, WANG J.Program evaluation of postgraduates from the perspective of the fourth-generation evaluation theory[J].Research in higher education of engineering, 2015(3): 108-113.)
[48] PEARSE H.The educational imagination[J].Canadian journal of education, 1980, 5(3): 112-115.
[49] HUEBNER A J.A constructivist approach to evaluation methodology: implications for positive youth development[D].Tucson: The University of Arizona, 1995.
[50] 蔡亮华, 陈伟俊, 杨红梅, 等.商业计划书投资人眼里的好方案[M].北京: 企业管理出版社, 2022: 189.(CAI L H, CHEN W J, YANG H M, et al.Business plan: a good program in the eyes of investors [M].Beijing: Enterprise Management Press, 2022: 189.)
[51] TANTALO C, PRIEM R L.Value creation through stakeholder synergy[J].Strategic management journal, 2016, 37(2): 314-329.
[52] AMIRI S, KING D R, DUESING R J.Managing divestments as projects: benefits of stakeholder orientation[J].International journal of project management, 2022, 40(4): 385-397.
[53] GARRIGA E.Beyond stakeholder utility function: stakeholder capability in the value creation process[J].Journal of business ethics, 2014, 120(4): 489-507.
[54] LONG K, WANG Y, ZHAO Y, et al.Who are the stakeholders and how do they respond to a local government payments for ecosystem services program in a developed area: a case study from Suzhou, China[J].Habitat international, 2015, 49: 1-9.
[55] BUCHHOLZ R A, ROSENTHAL S B.Stakeholder theory and public policy: how governments matter[J].Journal of business ethics, 2004, 51(2): 143-153.
[56] ROSE J, FLAK L S, SAEBO O.Stakeholder theory for the e-government context: framing a value-oriented normative core[J].Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(3): 362-374.
[57] 俞立平, 潘云涛, 武夷山.基于利益相关者分析的学术期刊评价指标选择研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2009(8): 20-23.(YU L P, PAN Y T, WU Y S.Research on the selection of evaluation indicators for academic journals based on stakeholder analysis[J].Forum on science and technology in China, 2009(8): 20-23.)
[58] 姜帅, 贝政新.利益相关者视角下科技期刊可持续发展研究[J].编辑学报, 2019, 31(2): 141-144.(JIANG S, BEI Z X.Sustainable development of scientific journals from stakeholder perspective[J].Acta editologica, 2019, 31(2): 141-144.)
[59] 谭春辉.高校人文社会科学研究成果评价机理研究——基于利益相关者的视角[J].社会科学管理与评论, 2013(2): 16-23, 111.(TAN C H.Study on evaluation mechanism of university’s humanities and social sciences research achievement: based on the perspective of stakeholders[J].Management and review of social sciences, 2013(2): 16-23, 111.)
[60] 尤莉.大学学术资源指标优先性评价及配置路径——基于对不同利益相关者的实证调查[J].现代教育管理, 2017(10): 43-49.(YOU L.Priority evaluation and configuration path of university academic resources[J].Modern education management, 2017(10): 43-49.)
[61] 刘黎明.从主体缺位到共同治理: 中美高校科研评价比较研究[J].科技管理研究, 2022, 42(3): 50-56.(LIU L M.From subject’s absence to co-governance: a comparative study of research evaluation systems in Chinese and American universities[J].Science and technology management research, 2022, 42(3): 50-56.)
[62] REF.About REF[EB/OL].[2023-12-24].https://2021.ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/index.html.
[63] ARC.Excellence in research for Australia[EB/OL].[2024-02-23].https://www.arc.gov.au/evaluating-research/excellence-research-australia#excellence-in-research-for-australia.
[64] ARC.Past ERA evaluations[EB/OL].[2024-01-08].https://www.arc.gov.au/evaluating-research/excellence-research-australia/past-era-evaluation.
[65] 刘晓娟, 周若卿.国外科研项目绩效评价实践及启示[J].图书情报工作, 2023, 67(14): 119-129.(LIU X J, ZHOU R Q.Practice and enlightenment of performance evaluation of scientific research projects abroad[J].Library and information service, 2023, 67(14): 119-129.)
[66] KONG J, ZHANG L X, JIANG M, et al.Incorporating multi-level CNN and attention mechanism for Chinese clinical named entity recognition[J].Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021, 116: 103737.
[67] MAO Y R, HAO Y, LIU W W, et al.Class-imbalanced-aware distantly supervised named entity recognition[EB/OL].[2024-08-18].https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10109246.
[68] ALSAARAN N, ALRABIAH M.Classical arabic named entity recognition using variant deep neural network architectures and BERT[J].IEEE access, 2021, 9: 91537-91547.
[69] YE F Y, HUANG L, LIANG S J, et al.Decomposed two-stage prompt learning for few-shot named entity recognition[J].Information, 2023, 14(5): 262.
[70] ZHAO B, JIN W Q, DEL SER J, et al.ChatAgri: exploring potentials of ChatGPT on cross-linguistic agricultural text classification[J].Neurocomputing, 2023, 557: 126708.
[71] DATTA S, LEE K, PAEK H, et al.AutoCriteria: a generalizable clinical trial eligibility criteria extraction system powered by large language models[J].Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2024, 31(2): 375-385.
[72] WOOLLEY R, MOLAS-GALLART J.Research impact seen from the user side[J].Research evaluation, 2023, 32(3): 591-602.
[73] COHEN J.A power primer[J].Psychological bulletin, 1992, 112(1): 115-159.
[74] Cambridge University Press Assessment.Cambridge dictionary[EB/OL].[2024-02-23].https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/.
