[1] PIWOWAR H, PRIEM J, LARIVIERE V, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles[J]. Scholarly research and information, 2020, 2(4): 228-247.
[2] 崔丽媛, 刘春丽. 开放获取S计划演进历程、动因及对我国的启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(4): 102-110. (CUI L Y, LIU C L. The development and motivation of the plan s to the practice and inspiration of open access in China [J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(4): 102-110.)
[3] NEYLON C, HUANG C K. The global state of open access 2021[EB/OL]. [2024-12-31]. https://zenodo.org/records/7059177.
[4] BAUTISTA-PUIG N, LOPEZ-ILLESCAS C, MOYA-ANEGON F, et al. Do journals flipping to gold open access show an OA citation or publication advantage?[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 124(3): 2551-2575.
[5] PIWOWAR H, PRIEM J, LARIVIERE V, et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles[J]. Scholarly research and information, 2020, 2(4): 228-247.
[6] GONZÁLEZ-BETANCOR S M, DORTA-GONZÁLEZ P. Publication modalities ‘article in press’ and ‘open access’ in relation to journal average citation[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(3): 1209-1223.
[7] FUKUZAWA N. Characteristics of papers published in journals: an analysis of open access journals, country of publication, and languages used[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(2): 1007-1023.
[8] LEWIS C L. The open access citation advantage: does it exist and what does it mean for libraries?[J]. Information technology and libraries, 2018, 37(3): 50-65.
[9] HUANG C K, NEYLON C, MoNTGOMERY L, et al. Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(2): 825-845.
[10] 陈秀娟, 张志强.开放科学的驱动因素、发展优势与障碍[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(6): 77-84. (CHEN X J, ZHANG Z Q. The driving factors, advantages and obstacles of the open science development [J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(6): 77-84.)
[11] HADAD S, AHARONY N, RABAN D R. Policy shaping the impact of open-access publications: a longitudinal assessment[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(1): 237-260.
[12] EYSENBACH G. Citation advantage of open access articles[J]. PLoS biology, 2006, 4(5): 692-698.
[13] MOSKOVKIN V M, SAPRYKINA T V, SADOVSKI M V, et al. International movement of open access to scientific knowledge: a quantitative analysis of country involvement[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2021, 47(1): 102296.
[14] MCCABE M J, SNYDER C M. Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals[J]. Economic inquiry, 2014, 52(4): 1284-1300.
[15] WANG H Y, WEI S X, CAO C, et al. Scientific value weights more than being open or toll access: an analysis of the OA advantage in and[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2021, 6(4): 62-75.
[16] POLLOCK D, MICHAEL A. Open access mythbusting: testing two prevailing assumptions about the effects of open access adoption[J]. Learned publishing, 2019, 32(1): 7-12.
[17] BEALL J. What the open-access movement doesn’t want you to know[J]. Academe, 2015, 101(3): 37-40.
[18] HALEVI G, WALSH S. Faculty attitudes towards article processing charges for open access articles[J]. Publishing research quarterly, 2021, 37(3): 384-398.
[19] PILELIEN $\dot{\mathbf{E}}$ L, JUCEVIČIUS G. A decade of innovation ecosystem development: bibliometric review of Scopus database[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(23): 1-26.
[20] YOUNG J S, BRANDES P M. Green and gold open access citation and interdisciplinary advantage: a bibliometric study of two science journals[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2020, 46(2): 1-7.
[21] OZAYGENA A. More readers in more places: the benefits of open access for scholarly books[J]. IMRAS, 2023, 6(4): 94-98.
[22] NAIK C, SUGIMOTO C R, LARIVIERE V, et al. Impact of geographic diversity on citation of collaborative research[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2023, 4(2): 442-465.
[23] 刘景康, 陈虹枢, 金茜茜, 等.科研合作网络演化机制研究:以光刻领域为例[J/OL]. 科学学研究, 1-23[2024-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240229.003. (LIU J K, CHEN H S, JIN X X, et al. Research on the evolutionary mechanism of scientific collaboration networks: the case of lithography technology [J/OL]. Studies in science of science, 1-23[2024-12-19]. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20240229.003.)
[24] RAHIMI S, SOHEILI F, NIA Y A. Social Influence, research productivity and performance in the social network co-authorship: a structural equation modelling[J]. Journal of scientometric research, 2020, 9(3): 326-334.
[25] 陈铭. 国际科技期刊论文开放获取现状比较研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2022(7): 33-42. (CHEN M. A comparative study on open access of international scientific journals [J]. Digital library forum, 2022(7): 33-42.)
[26] 中国科学技术协会, 国际科学, 技术与医学出版商协会.中国开放获取出版发展报告(2022)[R]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022. (China association for science and technology, international association of scientific, technical and medical publishers. China open access publishing development report (2022) [R]. Beijing: Science Press, 2022.)
[27] MALKAWI L, AL-RYALAT N, AL-HADIDI E, et al. The impact of open access status on journal indexes of radiology journals[J]. American journal of roentgenology, 2019, 213(4): 736-739.
[28] KOLPEKWAR J A, SHIDHAM V B. Impact of cytopathology authors work: comparative analysis based on open-access cytopathology publications versus non-open-access conventional publications[J]. CytoJournal, 2021, 18(1): 1-11.
[29] 孙娜.跨学科经历与学术产出的实证性复杂关联——以化学、数学物理、生命科学领域“杰青”学者为例[J]. 中国高教研究, 2023(10): 33-40. (SUN N. Empirically complex correlation between interdisciplinary experiences and academic outputs: taking “Outstanding” scholars in the fields of chemistry, mathematical physics, and life sciences as examples [J]. China higher education research, 2023(10): 33-40.)
[30] 王剑斌, 安维东, 何彦, 等.青年科研人才成长特征与资助策略优化研究[J]. 中国科学基金, 2023, 37(3): 488-495. (WANG J B, AN W D, HE Y, et al. Research on the growth characteristics of young scientific research talents and the optimization of funding strategy [J]. Bulletin of national natural science foundation of China, 2023, 37(3): 488-495.)
[31] 苏依依, 张铮煌, 苏涛永, 等. 科学基金资助、合作网络与科研产出: 学者异质性的调节效应[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(10): 164-178. (SU Y Y, ZHANG Z H, SU T Y, et al. Scientific grant support, collaborative network and scientific output: the moderating effects of scholar heterogeneity [J]. Science of science and management of science and technology, 2022, 43(10): 164-178.)
[32] 曾明彬, 韩欣颖, 张古鹏, 等. 社会资本对科学家科研绩效的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(2): 288-296. (ZENG M B, HAN X Y, ZHANG G P, et al. A research about the influence of social capital on scientists' scientific research performance [J]. Studies in science of science, 2022, 40(2): 288-296.)
[33] AO W, LYU D, RUAN X, et al. Scientific creativity patterns in scholars’ academic careers: evidence from PubMed[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2023, 17(4): 101463.
