[1] ORFILA M. Spain wants to change how it evaluates scientists—and end the 'dictatorship of papers'[EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.zehwqlq.
[2] 卢小宾, 黎炜祎. 智库评价体系构建研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2019, 40(3): 27-32. (LU X B, LI W Y. Research on the construction of think tank evaluation system[J]. Information and documentation services, 2019, 40(3): 27-32.)
[3] 马永霞, 仇笳熙. “不唯”≠“不评”: 论人文社会科学成果评价方式的改进[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 27(3): 54-66. (MA Y X, QIU J X. Breaking the “four-only” is not to abolish the evaluation: improvement of evaluation method of achievements in humanities and social sciences[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (social science edition), 2021, 27(3): 54-66.)
[4] 任全娥.人文社会科学成果评价研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2010. (REN Q E. Research on evaluation of humanities and social sciences achievements[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2010.)
[5] GIBBONS M, LEMOGES C, NOWOTNY H. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies[M]. London: Sage Publication, 1994: 125-163.
[6] 张炜, 王良. 大学知识生产模式变革与学科评估的未来走向[J]. 江苏高教, 2022(2): 38-44. (ZHANG W, WANG L. The transformation of knowledge production mode and the future of discipline evaluation[J]. Jiangsu higher education, 2022(2): 38-44.)
[7] CARAYANNIS E G, CAMPBELL D F J. ‘Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem[J]. International journal of technology management, 2009, 46(3-4): 201-234.
[8] 刘湉祎.新工科建设的“应为”与“可为”——基于知识生产模式的视角[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018(6): 11-15. (LIU T W. The “Should Do” and “Can Do” in the construction of emerging engineering[J]. Research in higher education of engineering, 2018(6): 11-15.)
[9] 王绍平, 陈兆山, 陈钟鸣, 等. 图书情报词典: 第1版[M]. 上海: 汉语大词典出版社, 1990. (WANG S P, CHEN Z S, CHEN C M, et al. Library and information dictionary[M]. 1st ed. Shanghai: the Publishing House of the Chinese Dictionary, 1990.)
[10] 吴宝康, 冯子直. 档案学词典: 第1版[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1994. (WU B K, FENG Z Z. Archives dictionary[M]. 1st ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, 1994.)
[11] 阎景翰, 刘路, 张国俊, 等. 写作艺术大辞典: 第2版[M]. 西安: 陕西人民出版社, 2002. (YAN J H, LIU L, ZHANG G J, et al. A dictionary of writing arts[M]. 2nd ed. Xi’an: Shaanxi People’s Education Press, 2002.)
[12] 潘珍. 科技情报机构研究报告服务科技管理决策的探讨——以福州市科技情报研究所为例[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2020, 52(6): 43-46, 62. (PAN Z. Discussion on the service of scientific and technical management decision by scientific and technical information organization research report: taking Fuzhou Institute of Scientific and Technical Information as an example[J]. China science & technology resources review, 2020, 52(6): 43-46, 62.)
[13] 任全娥.人文社科成果评价体系理论与实证研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2019. (REN Q E. Theoretical and empirical study on evaluation system for humanities and social sciences achievements[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2019.)
[14] 黄炜宇.图书馆非正式出版文献的收集问题浅析——以研究报告为例[J]. 现代情报, 2009, 29(10): 131-133. (HUANG W Y. Analysis on the collection of non-publication literature in library: taking the research report as an example[J]. Journal of modern information, 2009, 29(10): 131-133.)
[15] 葛新权.知识创新视角下社会科学研究及其成果评价的思考[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2022, 7(1): 2-11. (GE X Q. Thinking about evaluation of science research results[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2022, 7(1): 2-11.)
[16] 孙志茹.情报研究报告描述框架研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2008(1): 78-81. (SUN Z R. On the description frame of information research report[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2008(1): 78-81.)
[17] 百度百科. 研究报告[EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A?fromModule=lemma_search-box. (Baidu Baike. Research report [EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A?fromModule=lemma_search-box).
[18] WALSTER D, CHARBONNEAU D H, KUMASI K. Finding and reading reports of research: how academic librarians can help students be more successful[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2016, 42(6): 732-738.
[19] SALIMI, N. Quality assessment of scientific outputs using the BWM[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1): 195-213.
[20] BALL C, BARETT K, BERKERY P, et al. Promotion & tenure reform workgroup report[J]. Open scholarship initiative proceedings, 2017, 2(1): 1-9.
[21] 郁琴芳. 从研究报告到政策形成的教育政策制定模式之研究——以20世纪80年代美国关注教育质量政策的形成为例[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2004. (YU Q F. A study on the formulation model of educational policy from research report to policy formation: a case study of the formation of educational quality policy in the united state in the 80s of the 20th century [D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2004.)
[22] KIRBY P. The Kangan legacy[J]. Kangan, 1994, 20: 79-92.
[23] ATTEBERRY A C, MCEACHIN A J. Not where you start, but how much you grow: an addendum to the Coleman report[J]. Educational researcher, 2020, 49(9): 678-685.
[24] DELENICK J, GUY D, HAAK L, et al. Open Ip workgroup report[J]. Open scholarship initiative proceedings, 2017, 2(1): 10-18.
[25] 杨红艳, 戴鹏杰, 钱蓉, 等. 立足中国引领学术服务社会：中国特色哲学社会科学学术成果评价标准体系初探[J]. 情报资料工作, 2021, 42(3): 6-14. (YANG H Y, DAI P J, QIAN R, et al. Based on China, leading academics, and serving the society: a pro into the evaluation standard system of achievements in philosophy and social with Chinese characteristics[J]. Information and documentation services, 2021, 42(3): 6-14.)
[26] 邱均平, 任全娥. 我国人文社会科学研究成果评价研究进展[J]. 情报资料工作, 2006(4): 10-15. (QIU J P, REN Q E. Evaluation of research progress in the research of humanities and social sciences in China[J]. Information and documentation services, 2006(4): 10-15.)
[27] 任全娥.人文社会科学研究成果评价指标及其理论基础[J]. 情报资料工作, 2010(1): 28-33. (REN Q E. Evaluation index of humanities and social sciences research achievements and its theoretical base[J]. Information and documentation services, 2010(1): 28-33.)
[28] 安雪飞, 张立珊.人文社会科学科研成果评价分析[J]. 中国高校科技, 2015(Z1): 90-91. (AN X F, ZHANG L S. Evaluation and analysis of scientific research achievements in humanities and social sciences[J]. China university science & technology, 2015(Z1): 90-91.)
[29] 马海群, 韩娜, 张春春. 社会科学应用成果评价体系构建研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2022, 43(4): 44-51. (MA H Q, HAN N, ZHANG C C. A probe into the evaluation system construction of social sciences application achievements[J]. Information and documentation services, 2022, 43(4): 44-51.)
[30] 沙似鹏, 郑礼, 郭才伯, 等. 人文、社会科学研究成果评价指标体系初探[J]. 上海高教研究, 1994(1): 74-78. (SHA S P, ZEHN L, GUO C B, et al. A preliminary study on the evaluation index system of humanities and social science research achievements[J]. Research in educational development, 1994(1): 74-78.)
[31] 刘大椿. 人文社会科学研究成果评价体系研究[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2009: 357. (LIU D C. Study on evaluation system of research achievement of humanities and social science[M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2009: 357.)
[32] 曾天山. 中国社会科学研究质量标准体系研究[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版, 2014: 69. (ZENG T S. Research on the quality standard system of Chinese social science research[M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press, 2014: 69.)
[33] 叶蓬. 人文社会科学研究成果评估指标体系分析[J]. 探求, 2001(1): 60-67. (YE P. Analysis of the evaluation index system of humanities and social science research achievements[J]. Academic search for truth and reality, 2001(1): 60-67.)
[34] 吴桂鸿. 社会科学研究成果评价指标体系研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2006. (WU G H. The research on evaluation system of index of social science research achievement[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2006.)
[35] 邓毅. 社科成果评价指标体系探析[J]. 现代教育论丛, 2004(6): 21-26. (DENG Y. Analysis of the evaluation index system of social science achievements[J]. Modern education review, 2004(6): 21-26.)
[36] 孙浩, 王海鸥. 论建立社会科学成果评价指标体系[J]. 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1998(2): 142-147. (SUN H, WANG H O. On the establishment of an evaluation index system for social science achievements[J]. Journal of Hebei normal university (philosophy and social sciences), 1998(2): 142-147.)
[37] 许梅华. 我国人文社会科学成果评价指标体系研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2012. (XU M H. Research of assessment index system of humanities and social sciences achievements in China[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2012.)
[38] 杨霞, 熊世春. 社会科学研究成果综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 山西师大学报(社会科学版), 2008(3): 51-54. (YANG X, XIONG S C. A study on index system of comprehensive evaluation of achievements in social scientific research[J]. Journal of Shanxi normal university, 2008(3): 51-54.)
[39] 喻承久, 张勇. 社会科学成果评价指标体系分析[J]. 空军雷达学院学报, 2005(3): 73-75. (YU C J, ZHANG Y. Analysis of the evaluation index system of social science achievements[J]. Journal of air & space early warning research, 2005(3): 73-75.)
[40] 苗壮, 刘鹏年, 李杏军. 软科学研究机构的GJB9001标准质量管理体系建设[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2020, 29(6): 61-67. (MIAO Z, LIU P N, LI X J. Establishment of GJB9001 quality control system in soft science research institutions[J]. Chinese journal of medical library and information science, 2020, 29(6): 61-67.)
[41] VRHOVEC S, FUJS D, JELOVCAN L, et al. Evaluating case study and action research reports: real-world research in cybersecurity[J]. Journal of universal computer science, 2020, 26(7): 827-853.
[42] 全国哲学社会科学工作办公室. 国家社科基金项目成果鉴定表2024.1[EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. http://newkyc.jlufe.edu.cn/info/1035/1842.htm. (National office of philosophy and social sciences. National social science fund project achievement appraisal form 2024.1[EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. http://newkyc.jlufe.edu.cn/info/1035/1842.htm.)
[43] 安璐. 高校人文社会科学研究竞争力评价[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2004. (AN L. Evaluation on research competitiveness of social sciences and humanities among universities[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2004.)
[44] 马力. 大数据环境下人文社会科学评价创新的研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2016. (MA L. Research on innovation of social science evaluation under big data environment[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2016.)
[45] AIELLO E, DONOVAN C, DUQUE E, et al. Effective strategies that enhance the social impact of social sciences and humanities research[J]. Evidence & policy, 2021, 17(1): 131-146.
[46] 陈颖. 我国哲学社会科学评价的现状及出路[D]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2014. (CHEN Y. The current situation of philosophy and social science evaluation in our country and the way out[D]. Xiangtan: Xiangtan University, 2014.)
[47] GAMEA, LEON M, S A NCHEZ PLACE A, et al. Social impact ex-post evaluation protocol[J]. International journal of qualitative methods, 2022, 21(3): 1-8.
[48] 余厚强. 准确评价学术成果的社会影响力[J]. 青年记者, 2021(18): 4-5. (YU H Q. Accurately evaluate the social impact of academic achievements[J]. Youth journalist, 2021(18): 4-5.)
[49] BORNMANN L, HAUNSCHILD R, MARX W. Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? [J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(3): 1477-1495.
[50] 余厚强, 肖婷婷, 王曰芬, 等. 政策文件替代计量指标分布特征研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(5): 57-69. (YU H Q, XIAO T T, WANG Y F, et al. Study of distribution characteristics of policy documents altmetrics[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2017, 43(5): 57-69.)
[51] YOUTIE J, BOZEMAN B, JABBEHDARI S, et al. Credibility and use of scientific and technical information in policy making: an analysis of the information bases of the National Research Council’s committee reports [J]. Research policy, 2017, 46(1): 108-120.
[52] REALE E, AVRAMOV D, CANHIAL K, et al. A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research[J]. Research evaluation, 2018, 27(4): 298-308.
[53] TREMBLAY G, ZOHAR S, BRAVO J, et al. The Canada foundation for innovation's outcome measurement study: a pioneering approach to research evaluation[J]. Research evaluation, 2010, 19(5): 333-345.
[54] PROBST C, LEPORI B, DE FILIPPO D, et al. Profiles and beyond: constructing consensus on measuring research output in communication sciences[J]. Research evaluation, 2011, 20(1): 73-88.
[55] 中国人民大学评价研究中心. AI赋能社科研究与评价创新[EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/d7USNngKYCry6Gn5HPj6UQ. (Evaluation research center of Renmin university of China. AI empowers innovation in social science research and evaluation [EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/d7USNngKYCry6Gn5HPj6UQ.)
[56] 刘耀, 周家辉, 邱武文.基于大语言模型的人文社科类业务智能体构建平台研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2024, 45(5): 82-91. (LIU Y, ZHOU J H, QIU W W. Research on the platform for business agents construction in humanities and social sciences based on large language models[J]. Information and documentation services, 2024, 45(5): 82-91.)
[57] 中国人民大学商学院.人大商学院伊志宏教授团队牵头发布《分析师研究报告信息质量综合评价体系》报告[EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6wByySSSRmXAAK6vq1IXlQ. (Business school Renmin university of China. Professor Yi Zhihong's team from Renmin university of business school leads the release of the report ‘comprehensive evaluation system for information quality of analyst research reports’[EB/OL]. [2024-12-07]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6wByySSSRmXAAK6vq1IXlQ.)
[58] UKIDVE S, YADAV R, MANSHAHIA M S, et al. Evaluating research impact: a comprehensive overview of metrics and online databases[C]//International conference on intelligent computing & optimization. Cham: Springer Nature, 2023: 236-243.
[59] ALLEN R B. Using causal threads to explain changes in a dynamic system[C]//International conference on Asian digital libraries. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2023: 211-219.
