[1] 习近平在黑龙江考察时强调: 牢牢把握在国家发展大局中的战略定位奋力开创黑龙江高质量发展新局面[N]. 人民日报, 2023-09-09(1). (When Xi Jinping visited Heilongjiang, he emphasized: Firmly grasp the strategic positioning in the overall situation of national development strive to create a new situation of high-quality development in Heilongjiang[N]. The people's daily, 2023-09-09(1).)
[2] 50个动态场景看2024《政府工作报告》全文[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202403/content_6936260.htm. (The full text of the 2024 Report on the work of the government in 50 dynamic scenarios [EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202403/content_6936260.htm.)
[3] 中央经济工作会议在北京举行习近平发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202312/content_6919834.htm. (Xi Jinping delivers an important speech at the central economic work conference in Beijing[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202312/content_6919834.htm.)
[4] 窦贤康. 发展新质生产力的科学根基和动力源泉[N]. 学习时报, 2024-06-26, 第七版. (DOU X K. Scientific foundations and sources of motivation for the development of the new quality of productive forces[N]. The study times, 2024-06-26, 7th Edition.)
[5] 李辉作, 马源. 大学跨学科研究的驱动力及其阻碍因素分析[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2018, 36(6): 62-66. (LI H Z, MA Y. Analysis of driving force and its hindrance factors of interdisciplinary research in universities[J]. Heilongjiang researches on higher education, 2018, 36(6): 62-66.)
[6] MANSILLA V B, NAVAKAS F, FISCELLA J. Interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical examination of expert epistemologies[J]. Issues in interdisciplinary studies, 2006(24): 1-31.
[7] LEYDESDORFF L, BORNMANN L. “Interdisciplinarity” and “Synergy” in the Œuvre of Judit Bar-Ilan[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 123(3): 1247-1260.
[8] 王学典. 何谓“新文科”？[N]. 中华读书报, 2020-06-03(5). (WANG X D. What is the "new humanities"? [N]. China reading weekly, 2020-06-03(5).)
[9] 习近平. 加强基础研究实现高水平科技自立自强[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. http://www.cppcc.gov.cn/zxww/2023/07/31/ARTI1690788947353361.shtml. (XI J P. Achieve high-level scientific and technological self-reliance by strengthening basic research [EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. http://www.cppcc.gov.cn/zxww/2023/07/31/ARTI1690788947353361.shtml.)
[10] 刘冠君. 创新是新质生产力显著特点[EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0509/c40531-40231880.html. (LIU G J. Innovation is a distinctive feature of the new quality of productivity [EB/OL]. [2024-06-25]. http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0509/c40531-40231880.html.)
[11] 刘仲林. 当代跨学科学及其进展[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 1993, 9(1): 37-42. (LIU Z L. Contemporary interdisciplinary science and its progress[J]. Studies in dialectics of nature, 1993, 9(1): 37-42.)
[12] POPPER K R. Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge[M]. Illinois: Open Court Publishing, 1987.
[13] 滕广青. 基于频度演化的领域知识关联关系涌现[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2018, 44(3): 79-95. (TENG G Q. Emergence of correlation in domain know ledge based on frequency evolution[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2018, 44(3): 79-95.)
[14] 滕广青, 贺德方, 彭洁, 等. 基于网络演化的领域知识群落生长机制研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(10): 16-20. (TENG G Q, HE D F, PENG J. Research on the growth mechanism of knowledge community based on network evolution [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2016, 39(10): 16-20.)
[15] 李长玲, 高峰, 牌艳欣. 试论跨学科潜在知识生长点及其识别方法[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(6): 1007-1014. (LI C L, GAO F, PAI Y X. Research on potential interdisciplinary knowledge growth points and its identification method. [J]. Studies in science of science, 2021, 39(6): 1007-1014.)
[16] 李长玲, 范晴晴, 荣国阳, 等. 动能理论视角下跨学科知识生长点成长态势分析——以图书情报领域为例. [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(3): 9-15. (LI C L, FAN Q Q, RONG G Y, et al. analysis of the growth trend of interdisciplinary knowledge growth points from the perspective of kinetic energy theory: taking LIS as an example[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(3): 9-15.)
[17] 武杰. 跨学科研究与非线性思维[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2004. (WU J. Interdisciplinary research and non-linear thinking[M]. Beijing: China Social Science Press, 2004.)
[18] 梁镇涛, 巴志超, 徐健. 基于引文的跨学科领域发展路径分析——以眼动追踪领域为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(23): 65-78. (LIANG Z T, BA Z C, XU J. Development path of interdisciplinary field based on citation analysis: a case study of eye tracking[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(23): 65-78.)
[19] OKAMURA K. Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism[J]. Palgrave communications, 2019, 5(1): 1-9.
[20] 李长玲, 荣国阳, 申力旭, 等. 学科动能理论及其在学科影响力评价中的应用——以情报学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(23): 4-12. (LI C L, RONG G Y, SHEN L X, et al. Disciplinary kinetic energy theory and its application in the evaluation of subject influence: taking information science as an example[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(23): 4-12.)
[21] 李长玲, 荣国阳, 范晴晴, 等. 跨学科引用对知识生长的刺激作用与程度分析——以图书情报学为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(6): 1-8. (LI C L, RONG G Y, FAN Q Q, et al. Analysis of the stimulating effect and degree of interdisciplinary citation on the growth of knowledge: taking LIS as an example. [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(6): 1-8.)
[22] 金吾伦. 跨学科研究引论[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 1997. (JIN W L. Introduction to interdisciplinary studies[M]. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press, 1997.)
[23] 熊德勇, 和金生. SECI过程与知识发酵模型[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2004, 16(2): 14-19. (XIONG D Y, HE J S. The course of SECI and the model of knowledge fermenting[J]. R&D management, 2004, 16(2): 14-19.)
[24] 和金生. 知识管理与知识发酵[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2002, 23(3): 63-66. (HE J S. Knowledge management and fermentation[J]. Science of science and management of S.& T., 2002, 23(3): 63-66.)
[25] 刘洪. 科学发展的自然增长分形论[J]. 科学学研究, 1998, 16(4): 19-24. (LIU G. Natural growth fractal theory of scientific development[J]. Studies in science of science, 1998, 16(4): 19-24.)
[26] 范少萍, 安新颖, 单连慧, 等. 基于医学文献的主题演化类型与演化路径识别方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(3): 114-119. (FAN S P, AN X Y, SHAN L H, et al. Topic evolution type and method of path identification based on medical literature[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2019, 42(3): 114-119.)
[27] 潘海生, 韩铁. 基于知识发酵模型的大学集群知识增长机制分析[J]. 福州大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2011, 25(2): 98-102. (PAN H S, HAN T. Analysis of knowledge growth mechanism of university cluster based on knowledge fermentation model[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University (philosophy and social sciences), 2011, 25(2): 98-102.)
[28] 王雯霞, 刘春丽. 不同学科间论文影响力评价指标模型的差异性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(13): 108-116. (WANG W X, LIU C L. Study on the differences of the evaluation model of academic papers impact between different domains[J]. Library and information service, 2017, 61(13): 108-116.)
[29] 黄顺基. 科学论[M]. 郑州: 河南大学出版社, 1990. (HUANG S J. Scientology[M]. Zhengzhou: Henan University Press, 1990.)
[30] 陈燮君. 学科学导论——学科发展理论探索[M]. 上海: 上海三联书店, 1991. (CHEN X J. Introduction to discipline science: theoretical explorations in discipline development[M]. Shanghai: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1991.)
[31] GOFFMAN W. Mathematical approach to the spread of scientific ideas—the history of mast cell research[J]. Nature, 1966, 212: 449-452.
[32] SCHLOEGL C, GORRAIZ J. Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(3): 567-580.
[33] VAN LEEUWEN T, TIJSSEN R. Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows[J]. Research evaluation, 2000, 9(3): 183-187.
[34] 赵星, 谭旻, 余小萍, 等. 我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(5): 59-67. (ZHAO X, TAN M, YU X P, et al. Exploring the citation networks for knowledge diffusion of humanities and social sciences in China[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2012, 38(5): 59-67.)
[35] 赵丽梅, 孙艳华. 面向知识创新的高校科研团队内部知识整合的特征与内涵研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015, 35(1): 171-176. (ZHAO L M, SUN Y H. Study on the features and connotations of knowledge integration in the university scientific research team towards knowledge innovation[J]. Science and technology management research, 2015, 35(1): 171-176.)
[36] XIONG W J, ZHOU P. A search strategy for publications in interdisciplinary research[J]. Profesional de la información, 2023, 32(5): e320522.
[37] 徐晓林, 周立新. 数字治理在城市政府善治中的体系构建[J]. 管理世界, 2004(11): 140-141. (XU X L, ZHOU L X. System construction of digital governance in good governance of urban governments[J]. Journal of management world, 2004(11): 140-141.)
[38] 竺乾威. 公共行政理论[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2015. (ZHU Q W. Theory of public administration[M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2015.)
[39] 黄璜. 对“数据流动”的治理——论政府数据治理的理论嬗变与框架[J]. 南京社会科学, 2018(2): 53-62. (HUANG H. Governance of “flows of data”: theory development and framework of government data governance[J]. Nanjing journal of social sciences, 2018(2): 53-62.)
[40] 张卫, 朱晓峰, 王昊. 跨学科视角下政府数据开放的知识异质性分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(3): 49-60. (ZHANG W, ZHU XF, WANG H. An analysis of knowledge heterogeneity of government data opening from the interdisciplinary perspective[J]. Information and documentation services, 2020, 41(3): 49-60.)
[41] 徐晓林, 刘勇. 数字治理对城市政府善治的影响研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2006(1): 13-20, 107-108. (XU XL, LIU Y. Study on the influence of digital governance on good governance of municipal governments[J]. Journal of public management, 2006(1): 13-20, 107-108.)
[42] ERKUT B. From digital government to digital governance: are we there yet?[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(3): 1-13.
[43] MACROBERTS M H, MACROBERTS B R. Testing the ortega hypothesis: facts and artifacts[J]. Scientometrics, 1987, 12(5): 293-295.
[44] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2010, 61(12): 2389-2404.
[45] ETO M. Evaluations of context-based co-citation searching[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(2): 651-673.
[46] YOON S H, KIM S W, PARK S. C-Rank: a link-based similarity measure for scientific literature databases[J]. Information sciences, 2016, 326: 25-40.
[47] KALLING T. Organization‐internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: a qualitative case study[J]. Knowledge and process management, 2003, 10(2): 115-126.
[48] WANG C, RODAN S, FRUIN M, et al. Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of management journal, 2014, 57(2): 484-514.
[49] 李春景, 刘仲林. 现代科学发展学科交叉模式探析——一种学科交叉模式的分析框架[J]. 科学学研究, 2004, 22(3): 244-248. (LI C J, LIU Z L. A Research on the mode of interdisciplinarity for development in modern sciences: a theoretical analysis framework of the mode of interdisciplinarity[J]. Studies in science of science, 2004, 22(3): 244-248.)
[50] WANG J, THIJS B, GLÄNZEL W. Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(5): e0127298.
[51] 李江. “跨学科性”的概念框架与测度[J]. 图书情报知识, 2014, 38(3): 87-93. (LI J. The concept and measurement of interdisciplinarity[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2014, 38(3): 87-93.)
[52] LEYDESDORFF L, WAGNER C S, BORNMANN L. Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 255-269.
[53] 金子祺, 赵宇. 跨学科研究影响因素的概念模型[J]. 重庆高教研究, 2014, 2(2): 32-36. (JIN Z Q, ZHAO Y. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the interdisciplinary research[J]. Chongqing higher education research, 2014, 2(2): 32-36.)
[54] 吕海华, 李江. 1987-2016年跨学科知识流动的规律: 一个新的视角“学科势能”[J]. 图书情报知识, 2021, 38(4): 125-135. (LYU H H, LI J. An investigation of interdisciplinary knowledge flow from 1987 to 2016: a new perspective of “disciplinary potential energy”[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2021, 38(4): 125-135.)
[55] ROGAN M, MORS M L. A network perspective on individual-level ambidexterity in organizations[J]. Organization science, 2014, 25(6): 1860-1877.
[56] WANG M, YU G, YU D. Effect of the age of papers on the preferential attachment in citation networks[J]. Physical A: statistical mechanics and its applications, 2009, 388(19): 4273-4276.
[57] Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. Facilitating interdisciplinary research[J]. Facilitating interdisciplinary research, 2005: 114-136.
[58] AZOULAY P, GRAFF ZIVIN J S, MANSO G. Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences[J]. The RAND journal of economics, 2011, 42(3): 527-554.
[59] NICHOLSON J M, IOANNIDIS J P A. Conform and be funded[J]. Nature, 2012, 492(7427): 34-36.
[60] LERNER J, STERN S. Entrepreneurship and innovation policy and the economy[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022.
[61] BOUDREAU K J, GUINAN E C, LAKHANI K R, et al. Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science[J]. Management science, 2016, 62(10): 2765-2783.
[62] UZZI B, MUKHERJEE S, STRINGER M, et al. Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
[63] LI D. Expertise versus bias in evaluation: evidence from the NIH[J]. American economic journal: applied economics, 2017, 9(2): 60-92.
[64] FOLTZ F A. The ups and downs of peer review: Making funding choices for science[J]. Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2000, 20(6): 427-440.
[65] 柳洲, 陈士俊. 从学科会聚机制看跨学科科技创新团队建设[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2007, 24(3):165-168. (LIU Z, CHEN S J. Building of multi-discipline sci-tech innovation team based on mechanism of discipline converging[J]. Science & technology progress and policy, 2007, 24(3):165-168.)
[66] BARKOCZI D, GALESIC M. Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance[J]. Nature communications, 2016, 7(1): 1-8.
[67] 张立伟, 姜春林, 刘学, 等. 图书情报学高被引论文引用现象的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(16): 116-121. (ZHANG L W, JIANG C L, LIU X, et al. Empirical research on citing appearance of high cited papers of information science & library science[J]. Library and information service, 2014, 58(16): 116-121.)
