RESEARCH PAPERS

Study on the Key Factors Influencing the Tendency of US Patent Invalidation Request

  • Yang Xiuting ,
  • Zhang Shiyu
Expand
  • School of Public Administration and Policy, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024
Yang Xiuting, master’s candidate; Zhang Shiyu, associate professor, PhD, master’s supervisor, E-mail: zhangshiyu@dlut.edu.cn.

Received date: 2024-05-29

  Revised date: 2024-08-26

  Online published: 2025-07-21

Supported by

This work is supported by the youth project of the National Social Science Fund of China, titled “Research on the Realization Mechanism of Enterprise Patent Threat Early Warning Based on Multi-source Data Fusion” (Grant No. 19CTQ020).

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Under the background of economic globalization and production globalization, the filing of patent invalidation requests is a common means to obstruct the international patent layout and strategic implementation of competitive enterprises. Studying the key factors influencing the tendency of patent invalidation requests in the United States and analyzing their operation mechanism aims to help Chinese enterprises better understand the risks of patent invalidation requests, take corresponding measures to reduce the probability of patent invalidation requests, protect their technological innovation achievements, and enhance their competitiveness in the international market. [Method/Process] Taking the data of patent invalidation litigation in the United States as the research object, the key factors that cause patent invalidation requests were identified from five dimensions: patent relevance, legal stability, technical value, market value and industrial field. On this basis, the interactive relationship between various factors and the mechanism of patent invalidation requests were analyzed by constructing a structural equation model. [Result/Conclusion] The results show that legal stability, market value and industrial field will directly affect the occurrence probability of invalidation requests, while there is an indirect relationship between patent relevance and technical value and the occurrence of invalidation requests.

Cite this article

Yang Xiuting , Zhang Shiyu . Study on the Key Factors Influencing the Tendency of US Patent Invalidation Request[J]. Library and Information Service, 2025 , 69(15) : 64 -74 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.15.006

References

[1] 国家知识产权局.中华人民共和国专利法(2020年修正)[EB/OL]. [2025-05-20]. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2020/11/23/art_97_155167.html. (China National Intellectual Property Administration. Patent law of the people’s republic of China (2020 Amendment)[EB/OL]. [2025-05-20]. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2020/11/23/art_97_155167.html.)
[2] JEON H. Patent infringement, litigation, and settlement[J]. Economic modelling, 2015, 51: 99-111.
[3] 蒋启蒙, 朱雪忠. 专利侵权诉讼中无效宣告倾向的影响因素研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(7): 1224-1233. (JIANG Q M, ZHU X Z. Research on the influencing factors of patent invalidation propensity in patent infringement litigation[J]. Studies in science of science, 2022, 40(7): 1224-1233.)
[4] ALLISON J, LEMLEY M, WALKER J. Extreme value or trolls on top? The characteristics of the most-litigated patents[J]. University of Pennsylvania law review, 2009, 158(1): 1-37.
[5] FENG J, JARAVEL X. Crafting intellectual property rights: implications for patent assertion entities, litigation, and innovation[J]. American economic journal: applied economics, 2020, 12(1): 140-181.
[6] HENKEL J, ZISCHKA H. How many patents are truly valid? extent, causes, and remedies for latent patent invalidity[J]. European journal of law and economics, 2019, 48(2): 195-239.
[7] REILLY G. The complicated relationship of patent examination and invalidation[J]. The American university law review, 2020, 69(4): 1095-1162.
[8] 朱雪忠, 李艳. 我国创新药企被提专利无效请求风险预警研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(7): 22-30. (ZHU X Z, LI Y. A research on the risk early-warning of patent invalidation requests of innovative pharmaceutical enterprises in China[J]. Science research management, 2021, 42(7): 22-30.)
[9] 邓洁, 余翔, 崔利刚. 基于专利信息的我国发明专利无效行为实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(8): 52-58. (DENG J, YU X, CUI L G. An empirical study on invention patent invalidation behavior in China based on patent information[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2014, 33(8): 52-58.)
[10] 徐晨倩, 朱雪忠. 基于诉讼专利情报的美国337调查风险预警研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(9): 37-44. (XU C Q, ZHU X Z. Risk early-warning research of 337 investigations based on litigated patent intelligence[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2021, 40(9): 37-44.)
[11] MING C, YU X, ZHANG B, et al. A patent infringement early-warning methodology based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a case study of Huawei[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2022, 54: 101811.
[12]张世玉, 丁堃, 王宇开, 等. 融合多维特征的潜在诉讼风险专利识别研究[J]. 情报科学, 2024, 42(4): 129-135,144. (ZHANG S Y, DING K, WANG Y K, et al. Identification of potential litigation risk patent based on multi-dimensional features[J]. Information science, 2024, 42(4): 129-135,144.)
[13] WU H, ZHU G, LIU Q, et al. A multi-aspect neural tensor factorization framework for patent litigation prediction[J]. IEEE transactions on big data, 2024, 10(1): 35-54.
[14] 付振康, 柳炳祥, 方心如, 等. 专利权稳定性对专利质量的影响效应分析[J]. 情报探索, 2022(10): 6-14. (FU Z K, LIU B X, FANG X R, et al. Analysis on influential effect of patent stability on patent quality[J]. Information research, 2022(10): 6-14.)
[15] 李浩成. 影响发明或实用新型专利权稳定性的实质因素[J]. 政法论丛, 2008(1): 35-38. (LI H C. The real factors impacting invention or utility model patents’ stability[J]. Journal of political science and law, 2008(1): 35-38.)
[16] 栾春娟, 刘则渊, 王贤文. 发散与收敛:技术关联度的演变趋势分析——以全球太阳能技术的专利计量为例[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2013, 25(4): 87-95. (LUAN C J, LIU Z Y, WANG X W. Convergence and divergence: analysis on the evolving trend of technology relatedness: case study on patentometrics of worldwide solar energy technology[J]. R&D management, 2013, 25(4): 87-95.)
[17] 刘高勇, 吴金红, 汪会玲. 基于专利技术关联的产业竞争格局解析方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(8): 48-51, 91. (LIU G Y, WU J H, WANG H L. On the industry competition pattern analysis method based on patent technology association[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2014, 33(8): 48-51, 91.)
[18] 胡海容, 王志恒. 高价值专利的判定与培育[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2018, 15(12): 15-21. (HU H R, WANG Z H. Judgment and cultivation of high-value patents[J]. China invention & patent, 2018, 15(12): 15-21.)
[19] LEE J, MOON C. Characteristics of invalidated patents: econometric analysis of patent invalidation trial data of Korea[J]. The journal of intellectual property, 2020, 15(4): 263-300.
[20] 高艳红, 杨建华, 杨帆. 技术先进性评估指标体系构建及评估方法研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(5): 138-142. (GAO Y H, YANG J H, YANG F. Research on the construction of the technology advanced evaluation index system and the evaluation method[J]. Science & technology progress and policy, 2013, 30(5): 138-142.)
[21] 武川, 王宏起, 王珊珊. 前沿技术识别与预测方法研究——基于专利主题相似网络与技术进化法则[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(4): 34-42. (WU C, WANG H Q, WANG S S. Research on the identification and prediction methods of frontier technologies: based on the patent topic similarity network and technology evolution law[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2023(4): 34-42.)
[22] 吴凡. 知识密集型企业研发国际化对创新能力的影响研究[D]. 重庆: 四川外国语大学, 2023. (WU F. A study on the impact of internationalisation of R&D on innovation capability in knowledge-intensive firms[D]. Chongqing: Sichuan International Studies University, 2023.)
[23] 谭劲松, 宋娟, 陈晓红. 产业创新生态系统的形成与演进:“架构者”变迁及其战略行为演变[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(9): 167-191. (TAN J S, SONG J, CHEN X H. The formation and evolution of industrial innovation ecosystem: “architect” transition and the evolution of its strategic behavior[J]. Journal of management world, 2021, 37(9): 167-191.)
[24] 余江, 李博, 张贝贝, 等. 知识密集型产业全球创新生态“本土化”机制研究——基于生态主导者视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2024, 45(8): 109-125, 123. (YU J, LI B, ZHANG B B, et al. Research on the “localization” mechanism of global innovation ecology in knowledge-intensive industries: a ecological dominator perspective[J]. Science of science and management of S.& T., 2024, 45(8): 109-125, 123.)
[25] 付振康, 柳炳祥, 鄢春根, 等. 专利寿命视角下潜在高价值专利识别方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(5): 154-161, 207. (FU Z K, LIU B X, YAN C G, et al. Research on potential high-value patent identification methods from the perspective of patent life[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2023, 42(5): 154-161, 207.)
[26] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2009: 1-365. (WU M L. The operation and application of the structural equation model AMOS[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2009: 1-365.)
[27] 拉里·M.戈德斯坦. 专利的真正价值:defining quality in patents and patent portfolios[M]. 北京:知识产权出版社, 2020: 20-40. (GOLDSTEIN L. True patent value: defining quality in patents and patent portfolios[M]. Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2020:20-40.)
Outlines

/

〈 〉