[1] 李武, 谢泽杭. 社会化阅读的概念生成、发展演变及实践影响[J]. 现代出版, 2022(5): 60-67. (LI W, XIE Z H. Concept generation, evolution and practical impact of social reading[J]. Modern publishing, 2022(5): 60-67.)
[2] 钟雄. 社会化阅读:阅读的未来[N]. 中国新闻出版报, 2011-05-12(6). (ZHONG X. Social reading: the future of reading[N]. China press and publication journal, 2011-05-12(6).)
[3] 马学兰. 社会化阅读的演进及内在逻辑[J]. 出版与印刷, 2024(5): 25-31. (MA X L. The evolution and internal logic of social reading[J]. Publishing & printing, 2024(5): 25-31.)
[4] 毕秋敏, 曾志勇, 李明. 移动阅读新模式: 基于兴趣与社交的社会化阅读[J]. 出版发行研究, 2013(4): 49-52. (BI Q M, ZENG Z Y, LI M. New mode of mobile reading: social reading based on interest and social interaction[J]. Publishing research, 2013(4): 49-52.)
[5] 李林容, 张靖雯. 社会化阅读：历史回眸、现实困境与解困之思[J]. 中国编辑, 2022, 153(9): 16-22. (LI L R, ZHANG J W. Social reading: historical review, realistic difficulties, and thoughts on solution[J]. Chinese editors journal, 2022, 153(9): 16-22.)
[6] 李武.当阅读遇上社交[N]. 社会科学报, 2019-12-09(6). (Li W. When reading meets social reading[N]. Social sciences weekly, 2019-12-09(6).)
[7] OLIVER M. The problem with affordance[J]. E-learning and digital media, 2005, 2(4): 402-413.
[8] 张云, 茆意宏. 社会化阅读平台的用户互动关系探析——以“豆瓣读书”用户行为为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(12): 99-103. (ZHANG Y, MAO Y H. Analysis of the user interactive relationship in social reading platform: taking the user behavior of “Douban Reading” as an example[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2014, 37(12): 99-103.)
[9] 隗静秋, 陈晶. 社会加速视域下社会化阅读倦怠研究[J]. 出版发行研究, 2023(2): 76-80, 69. (KUI J Q, CHEN J. Research on socialized reading burnout in the perspective of social acceleration[J]. Publishing research, 2023(2): 76-80, 69.)
[10] 李武, 赵星. 大学生社会化阅读APP持续使用意愿及发生机理研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(1): 52-65. (LI W, ZHAO X. Understanding the continuance intention of social reading APPs by college students[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2016, 42(1): 52-65.)
[11] WHITE J W, HUNGERFORD-KRESSER H. Character journaling through social networks[J]. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 2014, 57(8): 642-654.
[12] 刘艳. 赛博空间语境中的社会化阅读:身体重构、游牧空间、传播进路及其迷阵与反思[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2019(1): 37-42, 48. (LIU Y. Social reading in the context of cyberspace: body reconstruction, nomadic space, communication path and its aporia and reflection[J]. Library theory and practice, 2019(1): 37-42, 48.)
[13] 黄铃, 宣建婷. 移动阅读的社交特色及改进策略——以“微信读书”为例[J]. 中国报业, 2019(16): 10-11. (HUANG L, XUAN J T. Social characteristics and improvement strategies of mobile reading: taking “WeChat Reading” as an example[J]. China newspaper industry, 2019(16): 10-11.)
[14] RICHARDS N M. The perils of social reading[J]. The Georgetown law journal, 2012, 101(3): 689-724.
[15] 柴阳丽, 陈向东, 李玉. 社会性交互对在线阅读的影响——基于“微信读书”的调查[J]. 开放教育研究, 2018, 24(4): 90-100. (CHAI Y L, CHEN X D, LI Y. Research on the social interaction in online reading and its impact: based on the investigation of “WeChat Reading” [J]. Open education research, 2018, 24(4): 90-100.)
[16] 夏玥, 林佩. 社会化阅读的群体、符号与情感——基于互动仪式链理论的微信读书App用户阅读行为分析[J]. 数字出版研究, 2023, 2(4): 71-78. (XIA Y, LIN P. Groups, symbols and emotions in social reading: analysis on reading behavior of “WeChat Reading” users based on interaction ritual chain theory[J]. Digital publishing research, 2023, 2(4): 71-78.)
[17] HEITING A. Socializing reading: facilitating dynamic adolescent reading communities[J]. Illinois reading council journal, 2015, 44(1): 23-33.
[18] 李武. 感知价值对电子书阅读客户端用户满意度和忠诚度的影响研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(6): 35-49. (LI W. The effects of perceived value on users’ satisfaction and loyalty towards e-book reading applications[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2017, 43(6): 35-49.)
[19] 李武, 谢泽杭, 杨飞. 社会化阅读批注研究：基于自主阅读和任务导向阅读情境的比较视角[J]. 数字出版研究, 2023, 2(4): 79-87. (LI W, XIE Z H, YANG F. Exploring digital social annotation: a comparative study conducted in voluntary and task-oriented reading contexts[J]. Digital publishing research, 2023, 2(4): 79-87.)
[20] ZEITHAML V A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence[J]. Journal of marketing, 1988, 52(3): 2-22.
[21] SWEENEY J C, SOUTARB G N. Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale[J]. Journal of retailing, 2001, 77(2): 203-220.
[22] MISILEI J, LIEW C L. Perceived value of digital components in library programmers: the case of Auckland libraries’ dare to explore summer reading programmer[J]. Library and information science research, 2018, 40(3-4): 219-236.
[23] 刘晓莉, 张雷. 社会化阅读平台特性、感知价值对用户持续使用意愿的影响研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2019(12): 53-56. (LIU X L, ZHANG L. Research on the influence of the social reading platform characteristics and perceived value on users’ willingness to use continuously[J]. New century library, 2019(12): 53-56.)
[24] 葛元骎. 感知价值对电子书阅读APP持续使用意向的影响研究：情绪响应的中介效应[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(7): 117-122. (GE Y Q. The impact of perceived value on the intention of continuous use of e-book reading APP: the mediating effect of emotional response[J]. Information science, 2020, 38(7): 117-122.)
[25] 赵文军, 谢守美. 大学生移动阅读感知价值、满意度与行为意向的关系: 以超星移动阅读APP平台为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(3): 98-107. (ZHAO W J, XIE S M. The relationship among perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intention of college students’ mobile reading: taking the “Superstar Mobile Reading” APP platform as an example[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(3): 98-107.)
[26] 肖雪, 邢畅, 申宁. 感知价值对高校图书馆读书会用户满意度和持续参与意愿的影响研究[J]. 图书馆, 2023(7): 89-98. (XIAO X, XING C, SHEN N. Research on the influence of perceived value on the satisfaction and continuous participation intention of reading club users in university library[J]. Library, 2023(7): 89-98.)
[27] 姜崇, 王晓光, 简华. 在线付费阅读中群体感知价值差异研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(4): 105-120. (JIANG C, WANG X G, JIAN H. Research on the difference of group perceived value in online paid reading[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2022, 12(4): 105- 120.)
[28] 万君, 张静. 大学生社会化阅读APP持续使用意愿实证研究[J]. 大学图书情报学刊, 2023, 41(4): 70-77, 121. (WAN J, ZHANG J. An empirical study on the college students’ continuance intention in social reading APP[J]. Journal of academic library and information, 2023, 41(4): 70-77, 121.)
[29] JIE M, WEI G. Research on the influence of perceived value of social reading on teenagers’ reading ability[J]. Journal of contemporary educational research, 2021, 5(10): 109-116.
[30] MASON D. Social reading: platforms, applications, clouds and tags[J]. Online information review, 2014, 38(6): 838-839.
[31] 常璐. 当阅读遇到社交, 能否碰撞出不一样的火花?——基于“微信读书”APP的体验与思考[J]. 传媒, 2017(7): 53-55. (CHANG L. When reading encounters socializing, can different sparks be ignited? Experience and reflection based on the “WeChat Reading” APP[J]. Media, 2017(7): 53-55.)
[32] BURHAN-HORASANLI E. Digital social reading: exploring multilingual graduate students’ academic discourse socialization in online platforms[J]. Linguistics and education, 2022, 71: 101099.
[33] LI W, MAO Y, ZHOU L. The impact of interactivity on user satisfaction in digital social reading: social presence as a mediator[J]. International journal of human-computer Interaction, 2021, 37(17): 1636-1647.
[34] SUN C, HWANG G J, YIN Z, et al. Trends and issues of social annotation in education: a systematic review from 2000 to 2020[J]. Journal of computer assisted learning, 2023, 39(2): 329-350.
[35] 李武, 艾鹏亚, 姚琦. 社会化批注能否提升阅读理解水平?——基于个体化和社会化批注对比的实验研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2024, 50(6): 119-134. (LI W, AI P Y, YAO Q. Does social annotation improve reading comprehension? An experimental comparison with individual annotation[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2024, 50(6): 119-134.)
[36] 尹婕, 杨柳. 移动阅读应用的创新扩散策略研究——以“网易蜗牛读书”为例[J]. 科技传播, 2020, 12(18): 29-32. (YIN J, YANG L. Research on innovative diffusion strategies of mobile reading applications: taking “Net Ease Snail Reading” as an example[J]. Public communication of science & technology, 2020, 12(18): 29-32.)
[37] 李武, 吴赟, 张云, 等. Kindle走后怎样：数字阅读的未来[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(4): 80-91. (LI W, WU B, ZHANG Y, et al. The future of digital reading[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2022, 39(4): 80-91.)
[38] 王海燕. 移动终端社会化阅读[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019. (WANG H Y. Social reading of mobile terminals[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2019.)
[39] GIBSON J J. The ecological approach to visual perception[M]. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 1986.
[40] WAIZENEGGER L, MCKENNA B, CAI W J, et al. An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19[J]. European journal of information systems, 2020, 29(4): 429-442.
[41] SJÖBLOM M, TÖRHÖNEN M, HAMARI J, et al. The ingredients of Twitch streaming: affordances of game streams[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2019, 92: 20-28.
[42] HEIKKILÄ H. Social reading and eBooks[C]//SCHMIDT B, DOBREVA M. New avenues for electronic publishing in the age of infinite collections and citizen science: scale, openness and trust. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2015:169-172.
[43] 沈霄, 王国华. 网络直播+政务与用户的互动研究——基于互动仪式链的视角[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(5): 111-116, 175. (SHEN X, WANG G H. Study on the interactive of live-streaming + government affairs and users: based on the perspective of interaction ritual chains[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2018, 37(5): 111-116, 175.)
[44] 张莉, 孙晓宁, 朱庆华. 基于三元交互模型的社会化搜索用户行为研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(4): 40-49. (ZHANG L, SUN X N, ZHU Q H. Research on users’ information search behavior under social search context: based on triadic reciprocal determinism[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2021, 44(4): 40-49.)
[45] 陈璨, 阮建海. 微信公众平台知识型信息交互行为对粉丝满意度的影响研究——以“知音真实故事”为例[J]. 情报探索, 2020(7): 27-35. (CHEN C, RUAN J H. Research on the impact of knowledge-based information interaction behavior on fan satisfaction on WeChat public platform: take BOSOM TRUE STORY as an example[J]. Information research, 2020(7): 27-35.)
[46] 未来智库. 2022年在线阅读行业发展现状分析多元化在线阅读市场需求[EB/OL]. [2024-09-15]. https://www.vzkoo.com/read/20220215563141adacea95ff59d99bc5.html. (VZKOO. Analysis of the development status of the online reading industry in 2022 and the diverse demand of the online reading market[EB/OL]. [2024-09-15]. https://www.vzkoo.com/read/20220215563141adacea95ff59d99bc5.html.)
[47] 阅文集团内容引进合作业务2020年全面升级[EB/OL]. [2024-09-15]. https://k.sina.com.cn/article_1686546714_6486a91a02000xjqx.html. (China Literature Limited’s content introduction cooperation business will be fully upgraded in 2020[EB/OL]. [2024-09-15]. https://k.sina.com.cn/article_1686546714_6486a91a02000xjqx.html.)
[48] HEKTNER J M, SCHMIDT J A, CSIKSZENTMIHALYI M. Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life[M]. California: Sage, 2006.
[49] MEHRABIAN A, RUSSELL J A. An approach to environmental psychology[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1974.
[50] 戴德宝, 顾晓慧. 用户参与行为、感知价值与忠诚度:基于移动短视频社交应用的分析[J]. 消费经济, 2017, 33(2): 58-65. (DAI D B, GU X H. User participation behavior, perceived value and customer loyalty analysis based on mobile short video social application[J]. Consumer economics, 2017, 33(2): 58-65.)
[51] 于申. 社会化阅读平台用户持续知识共享意愿研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2016(12): 54-62. (YU S. Research on the intention of social reading platform users continuous sharing[J]. Digital library forum, 2016(12): 54-62.)
[52] 孙挺, 夏立新, 李雪, 等. 社会化阅读用户持续使用意愿影响因素的荟萃分析[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(7): 153-161. (SUN T, XIA L X, LI X, et al. Meta-analysis of impact factors on continuous usage intention of social reading users[J]. Information science, 2021, 39(7): 153-161.)
[53] 李武, 艾鹏亚, 谢蓉. 基于感知价值视角的在线付费问答平台用户付费意愿研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2018, 184(4): 4-14. (LI W, AI P Y, XIE R. Users’ willingness of paying for online Q&A platform based on the perceived value[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2018, 184(4): 4-14.)
[54] 张凤超, 尤树洋. 体验价值结构维度:基于共同制造组织模式的实证研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 63(3): 451-457. (ZHANG F C, YOU S Y. Dimensions of experimental value: an empirical research from co-production organization[J]. Wuhan University journal (philosophy & social science), 2010, 63(3): 451-457.)
[55] 霍明奎, 李静. 开放式创新社区用户持续知识贡献行为影响因素及提高策略研究[J]. 情报科学, 2024, 42(4): 145-154, 166. (HUO M K, LI J. Influencing factors of continuous knowledge contribution behavior and improvement strategies of users in open innovation communities[J]. Information science, 2024, 42(4): 145-154, 166.)
[56] 谭继雄. 公共图书馆阅读体验的影响因素研究——基于青少年群体阅读风格视角[J]. 图书馆学刊, 2020, 42(8): 68-72. (TAN J X. A study on the influencing factors of reading experience in public libraries: based on the perspective of reading styles of adolescents[J]. Journal of library science, 2020, 42(8): 68-72.)
[57] BHATTACHERJEE A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation- confirmation model[J]. MIS quarterly, 2001, 25(3): 351-370.
[58] 赵乃瑄, 刘佳静, 金洁琴. 高校图书馆微信公众号用户持续使用意愿研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2019, 39(3): 97-103. (ZHAO N X, LIU J J, JIN J Q. Research on users’ willingness to continue using university library WeChat public accounts[J]. Library tribune, 2019, 39(3): 97-103.)
[59] LIN W S, WANG C H. Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: a contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit[J]. Computers & education, 2012, 58(1): 88-99.
[60] 王哲. 社会化问答社区知乎的用户持续使用行为影响因素研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(1): 78-83, 143. (WANG Z. Investigating the influencing factors of continuous usage behavior in social Q&A: the case of ZhiHu.com[J]. Information science, 2017, 35(1): 78-83, 143.)
[61] NUNNALLY J C. Psychometric theory[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978: 131-135.
[62] BAGOZZI R P, YI Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 1988, 16(1): 74-94.
[63] FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(1): 39-50.
[64] 肖雪, 李敏, 秦馨怡, 等. 虚拟阅读社区用户互动特征与影响因素[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2023, 43(8): 109-119. (XIAO X, LI M, QIN X Y, et al. Users’ interaction in virtual reading community: characteristics and influencing factors[J]. Library tribune, 2023, 43(8): 109-119.)
[65] 李武, 谢泽杭. 数智人如何赋能数字阅读实践?——基于互动性理论视角[J]. 出版发行研究, 2024(4): 33-37. (LI W, XIE Z H. How Al digital person empowers digital reading practices: an exploration from the perspective of interaction theory[J]. Publishing research, 2024(4): 33-37.)
