[1] 中华人民共和国科学技术部.关于开展科技人才评价改革试点的工作方案[EB/OL].[2025-04-16]. https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2022/202211/t20221109_183356.html.(Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China. Work plan for pilot reform of science and technology talent e-valuation[EB/OL].[2025-04-16]. https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2022/202211/t20221109_183356.html.)
[2] 中华人民共和国教育部.关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用树立正确评价导向的若干意见[EB/OL].[2025-04-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/moe_784/202002/t20200223_423334.html.(Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Several opinions on standardizing the use of indicators related to SCI papers in higher education institutions and establishing a correct evaluation orientation[EB/OL].[2025-04-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/moe_784/202002/t20200223_423334.html.)
[3] SARAH M. Progressing research impact assessment:a'contributions'approach[J]. Research evaluation, 2015, 24(4):405-419.
[4] 梁琪奇,郭凤娇,王婧菲,等.单篇学术论文创新类型研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(9):166-173.(LIANG Q Q, GUO F J, WANG J F, et al. Research on individual academic paper innovation types[J]. Information studies:theory&application,2024, 47(9):166-173.)
[5] 周海晨,郑德俊,郦天宇.学术全文本的学术创新贡献识别探索[J].情报学报, 2020, 39(8):845-851.(ZHOU H C,ZHENG D J, LI T Y. Research on the identification of academic innovation contributions of full academic texts[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020,39(8):845-851.)
[6] 索传军,于果鑫.学术论文研究亮点的语言学特征与分布规律研究[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(9):104-113.(SUO C J,YU G X. Exploration of the research "highlights" in academic papers[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(9):104-113.)
[7] XIE J, GONG K, LI J, et al. A probe into 66 factors which are possibly associated with the number of citations an article received[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 119(3):1429-1454.
[8] ZHANG L, SIVERTSEN G, DU H, et al. Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research[J]. Scientometrics, 2021,126(11):8861-8886.
[9] 索传军,盖双双,周志超.认知计算--单篇学术论文评价的新视角[J].中国图书馆学报, 2018, 44(1):50-61.(SUO C J,GAI S S, ZHOU Z C. Cognitive computing:a new perspective for evaluating the individual academic paper[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2018, 44(1):50-61.)
[10] 罗卓然,王玉琦,钱佳佳,等.学术论文创新性评价研究综述[J].情报学报, 2021, 40(7):780-790.(LUO Z R, WANG Y Q, QIAN J J, et al. Research review on innovation evaluation of academic papers[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(7):780-790.)
[11] COSTANZO B P, SÁNCHEZ L E. Innovation in impact assessment theory and practice:how is it captured in the literature?[J]. Environmental impact assessment review, 2019,79:106289.
[12] CHEN H, NGUYEN H, ALGHAMDI A. Constructing a high-quality dataset for automated creation of summaries of fundamental contributions of research articles[J]. Scientometrics,2022, 127(12):7061-7075.
[13] 徐雷,张亚菲,叶均玲.科技文献创新内容的识别、组织与应用进展[J].情报学报, 2024, 43(2):237-250.(XU L,ZHANG Y F, YE J L. Advances in identification, organization,and application of innovative content in scientific literature[J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2024, 43(2):237-250.)
[14] VOGT L, D'SOUZA J, STOCKER M, et al. Toward representing research contributions in scholarly knowledge graphs using knowledge graph cells[C]//Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries in 2020. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2020:107-116.
[15] 李贺,杜杏叶.基于知识元的学术论文内容创新性智能化评价研究[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(1):93-104.(LI H, DU X Y. Research on intelligent evaluation for the content innovation of academic papers[J]. Library and information service, 2020,64(1):93-104.)
[16] 罗卓然,蔡乐,钱佳佳,等.学术论文创新贡献句识别研究[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(12):93-100.(LUO Z R, CAI L, QIAN J J, et al. Research on the recognition of innovative contribution sentences of academic papers[J]. Library and information service,2021, 65(12):93-100.)
[17] 崔京艳,邓媛,李春梅,等.中医学科技论文创新性和科学性的识别与评价[J].中国医药导报, 2018, 15(5):172-176.(CUI J Y, DENG Y, LI C M, et al. Recognition and evaluation of the innovation and scientific nature of Chinese medical science and technology papers[J]. China medical herald, 2018, 15(5):172-176.)
[18] 曹树金,闫欣阳,张倩,等.中外情报学论文创新性特征研究[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(1):80-92.(CAO S J, YAN X Y,ZHANG Q. Research on characteristics of innovation in Chinese and international academic literature of information science[J].Library and information service, 2020, 64(1):80-92.)
[19] 蔡乐,罗卓然,陆伟.学术论文科研贡献类型自动识别研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(6):168-175.(CAI L, LUO Z R,LU W. Research on automatic recognition of scientific research contribution types of academic papers[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2023, 46(6):168-175.)
[20] D'SOUZA J, AUER S, PEDERSEN T. SemEval-2021 Task 11:NLPContributionGraph--structuring scholarly NLP contributions for a research knowledge graph[J]. arXiv preprint, 2021,arXiv:2106.07385.
[21] CHAO W, CHEN M, ZHOU X, et al. A joint framework for identifying the type and arguments of scientific contribution[J].Scientometrics, 2023, 128(6):3347-3376.
[22] 温浩.科技文摘创新点语义识别与分类方法研究[J].情报学报, 2019, 38(3):249-256.(WEN H. Semantic recognition and classification method of innovation points in scientific and technological abstracts[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(3):249-256.)
[23] 曹树金,闫颂.基于语义角色信息的科技论文创新段落定位及功能句识别方法研究--以中文情报学领域论文为例[J].情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(11):1-9, 20.(CAO S J, YAN S. Research on innovative paragraph positioning and functional sentence identification method of scientific and technical papers based on semantic role information:a case study of papers in the field of Chinese intelligence[J]. Information studies:theory&application, 2022, 45(11):1-9, 20.)
[24] REHMAN T, SANYAL D K, CHATTOPADHYAY S,et al. Automatic generation of research highlights from scientific[C]//2nd workshop on extraction and evaluation of knowledge entities from scientific documents (EEKE'21),collocated with JCDL. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2021:69-70.
[25] GUPTA K, AHMAD A, GHOSAL T, et al. A BERT-based sequential deep neural architecture to identify contribution statements and extract phrases for triplets from scientific publications[J]. International journal on digital libraries, 2024,25(4):1-28.
[26] 冯长根.一种自然而然的科技成果评价方法值得国家推广[J].中国人大, 2017(7):33-35.(FENG C G. A natural method for evaluating technological achievements is worth promoting by the country[J]. The People's Congress of China, 2017(7):33-35.)
[27] 章成志,李铮.基于学术论文全文的创新研究评价句抽取研究[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10):12-19.(ZHANG C Z, LI Z. Extracting sentences of research originality from full text academic articles[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery,2019, 3(10):12-19.)
[28] LE X, CHU J, DENG S, et al. CiteOpinion:evidence-based evaluation tool for academic contributions of research papers based on citing sentences[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2019, 4(4):26-41.
[29] AKSNES D W. Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(2):169-185.
[30] 杨思洛,程濛,莫莹莹.学术论文研究亮点的语言特征与主题识别[J].图书馆论坛, 2023, 43(7):26-37.(YANG S L, CHENG M, MO Y Y. A multidimensional analysis of research highlights in academic papers:linguistic features and topic identification[J].Library tribune, 2023, 43(7):26-37.)
[31] HTOO T H H, NA JIN-CHEON. Comparison of Altmetrics across multiple disciplines:psychology, history, and linguistics.[C]//International conference of Asian special libraries 4th ICoASL. Seoul:The Special Libraries Association, 2015:1-12.
[32] GUMPENBERGER C, GLÄNZEL W, GORRAIZ J. The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,108(2):977-982.
[33] OPENALEX. OpenAlex:end-to-end process for topic classification[EB/OL].[2025-04-16]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bDopkhuGieQ4F8gGNj7sEc8WSE8mvLZS/edit#heading=h.gi6h2p6vd793.
[34] DEGEN J, HAWKINS R D, GRAF C, et al. When redundancy is useful:a Bayesian approach to "overinformative" referring expressions[J]. Psychological review, 2020, 127(4):591.
[35] AYÁN C, FERNÁNDEZ-VILLA T, DURO A, et al. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for assessing self-perceived health-related fitness in Spanish children[J]. The Spanish journal of psychology, 2020, 23:e25.
[36] OH V, TONG E M W. Negative emotion differentiation and longterm physical health-the moderating role of neuroticism[J].Health psychology, 2020, 39(2):127.
[37] PENG P, LIN X,ÜNAL Z E, et al. Examining the mutual relations between language and mathematics:a meta-analysis[J].Psychological bulletin, 2020, 146(7):595.
[38] PRICE G C, JANSEN K L, WEICK M R. Let's talk about sex:ethical considerations in survey research with minority populations[J]. Translational issues in psychological science,2020, 6(3):214.
[39] DEVLIN J, CHANG M W, LEE K, et al. Bert:pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[J].arXiv preprint, 2018, arXiv:1810.04805.
[40] 张蒙,王志灵,张昱城,等.元分析方法综述:从基础到高阶[J].技术经济, 2024, 43(1):140-151.(ZHANG M, WANG Z L,ZHANG Y C. A review of meta-analysis:from the basics to the advanced[J]. Journal of technology economics, 2024, 43(1):140-151.)
[41] DÍAZ-FAES A A, BOWMAN T D, COSTAS R. Towards a second generation of'social media metrics':characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science[J]. PloS one,2019, 14(5):e0216408.
[42] ZHANG L, GOU Z, FANG Z, et al. Who tweets scientific publications?a large-scale study of tweeting audiences in all areas of research[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023, 74(13):1485-1497.
