[1] 国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于完善科技成果评价机制的指导意见[EB/OL]. [2025-10-01]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/zcwj/gwywj/202108/t20210802_853757.shtml. (General Office of the State Council. Guiding opinions of the general office of the state council on improving the evaluation mechanism for scientific and technological achievements[EB/OL]. [2025-10-01]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/zcwj/gwywj/202108/t20210802_853757.shtml.)
[2] 董鲁皖龙. 破“SCI至上”后, 科研评价体系如何立[N]. 中国教育报, 2020-03-18(4). (DONG LUWANLONG. After breaking the “SCI supremacy”, how to establish a scientific research evaluation system[N]. China education daily, 2020-03-18(4).)
[3] Cheng X, Tang L, ZHOU M, et al. Coevolution of COVID-19 research and China’s policies[J]. Health research policy and systems, 2021, 19(1): 121.
[4] 任超, 杨孟辉, 李恺, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情防控政策中引用科学论文的影响因素分析[J]. 情报学报, 2023, 42(3): 341-353. (REN C, YANG M H, LI K, et al. Analysis of factors in citing scientific papers in policies against COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2023, 42(3): 341-353.)
[5] 杨代福, 沈玲丽. 政策制定对学术研究的使用：程度测量、影响因素、对策及启示[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2024, 9(2): 13-21, 28. (YANG D F, SHEN L L. The use of academic research in policy making: degree measurement, influencing factors, countermeasures and enlightenments [J]. Think tank: theory & practice, 2024, 9(2): 13-21, 28.)
[6] 王楠, 罗珺文. 英国高校科研成果的社会影响力评析——基于REF2014评估中6679份影响力案例的再分析[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2019, 40(5): 75-81. (WANG N, LUO J W. The impact of scientific research from UK higher education institutions based on a synthetic analysis of the 6679 impact case studies in ref2014[J]. Tsinghua journal of education, 2019, 40(5): 75-81.)
[7] 赵蓉英, 郭凤娇, 谭洁. 基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(1): 96-108. (ZHAO R Y, GUO F J, TAN J. Evaluation of academic papers impact based on Altmetrics: a case study of Chinese language and literature[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2016, 42(1): 96-108.)
[8] 张义川, 赵聪聪, 伍军红, 等. 期刊政策影响力评价方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(22): 95-105. (Zhang Y C, Zhao C C, Wu J H, et al. Research on evaluation method of journal policy influence[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(22): 95-105.)
[9] Weiss C H. The many meanings of research utilization[J]. Public administration review, 1979, 39(5): 426-431.
[10] Lavis J N, Ross S E, Hurley J E, et al. Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking[J]. The milbank quarterly, 2002, 80(1): 125-154.
[11] Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Marx W. Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(3): 1477-1495.
[12] 曹喆, 尚媛媛, 张琳. 哪些研究更易产生政策影响——以学术论文分类与多维特征分析为路径[J]. 图书情报知识, 2025, 42(1): 6-17, 28. (CAO Z, SHANG Y Y, ZHANG L. What kinds of research are more likely to generate policy impact: taking classification and multidimensional characteristics of academic articles as pathways[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2025, 42(1): 6-17, 28.)
[13] 余厚强, 肖婷婷, 王曰芬, 等. 政策文件替代计量指标分布特征研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(5): 57-69. (YU H q, XIAO T t, WANG Y f, et al. Study of distribution characteristics of policy documents Altmetrics [J]. Journal of library science in China, 2017, 43(5): 57-69.)
[14] Dorta-González P, Rodríguez-Caro A, Dorta-González M I. Societal and scientific impact of policy research: a large-scale empirical study of some explanatory factors using Altmetric and Overton[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2024, 18(3): 101530.
[15] Newson R, Rychetnik L, King L, et al. Does citation matter? Research citation in policy documents as an indicator of research impact: an Australian obesity policy case-study[J]. Health research policy and systems, 2018, 16(1): 55.
[16] 刘晓娟, 周若卿, 肖云彤, 等. 政策提及指标在学术成果社会影响力评价中的应用价值分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(11): 47-55. (Liu X J, Zhou R Q, Xiao Y T, et al. Application value analysis of policy mention indicators in the evaluation of social impact of academic achievements[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2024, 47(11): 47-55.)
[17] Yu H, Murat B, Li J, et al. How can policy document mentions to scholarly papers be interpreted? An analysis of the underlying mentioning process[J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(11): 6247-6266.
[18] 朱富成, 刘永. 利用政策关联度指标进行学术影响力研究——以疫情防控档案政策关联度为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(14): 62-72. (Zhu F C, Liu Y. Discussion on academic influence of analysis of policy related degree index of our country: a case study of the correlation degree of epidemic prevention and control archives policies[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(14): 62-72.)
[19] 胡吉明, 钱玮, 文鹏, 等. 基于结构功能和实体识别的文本语义表示——以病历领域为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(8): 110-121. (Hu J M, Qian W, Wen P, et al. Text semantic representation with structure-function and entity recognition: case study of medical records[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2022, 6(8): 110-121.)
[20] 冉从敬, 田文芳, 贾志轩. 基于混合方法的“科学论文-专利技术”关联关系模型构建——以生物医药领域为例[J]. 情报科学, 2024, 42(6): 132-143. (RAN C J, TIAN W f, JIA Z x. Modeling of scientific paper-patent technology association relationship based on mixed methods: taking the biomedical field as an example[J]. Information science, 2024, 42(6): 132-143.)
[21] 武楷彪, 郎宇翔, 董瑜. 融合句法结构和词义信息的政策文本关联挖掘方法研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(5): 20-33. (Wu K B, Lang Y X, Dong Y. Mining policy text relevance with syntactic structure and semantic information[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2022, 6(5): 20-33.)
[22] Riley B L, Kernoghan A, Stockton L, et al. Using contribution analysis to evaluate the impacts of research on policy: getting to ‘good enough’[J]. Research evaluation, 2018, 27(1): 16-27.
[23] Tattersall A, Carroll C. What can altmetric.com tell us about policy citations of research? An analysis of altmetric.com data for research articles from the university of Sheffield[J]. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2017, 2(1): 9.
[24] 李萍. 我国上市公司年报中“管理层讨论与分析”的可读性分析[J]. 时代金融, 2018(9): 225-226. (Li P. Readability analysis of “management discussion and analysis” in the annual reports of listed companies in China[J]. Times finance, 2018(9): 225-226.)
[25] Ren C, Yang M. Study on the characteristics of cross-domain knowledge diffusion from science to policy: evidence from Overton data[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023, 60(1): 368-378.
[26] 刘自强, 许海云, 罗瑞, 等. 基于主题关联分析的科技互动模式识别方法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(10): 997-1011. (Liu Z q, Xu H y, Luo R, et al. Research on scientific and technological interaction patterns based on topic relevance analysis[J]. Journal of the China Society For Scientific And Technical Information, 2019, 38(10): 997-1011.)
[27] 阮光册, 周萌葳. 基于Sentence-BERT的专利技术主题聚类研究——以人工智能领域为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(2): 110-117. (Ruan G c, Zhou M w. Research on patent technology subject clustering based on Sentence-BERT: taking the field of artificial intelligence as an example[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2024, 43(2): 110-117.)
[28] 唐晓波, 吴海婷, 吴佳琳. 基于特征知识元的专利语义引用识别方法研究——以量子计算领域为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(10): 86-95. (TANG X B, WU H T, WU J L. Research on patent semantic references recognition method based on feature knowledge elements: using quantum computing as an example[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(10): 86-95.)
[29] Inui K, Jiang J, Ng V, et al. Sentence-BERT: sentence embeddings using Siamese Bert-networks[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing. Hong Kong: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 3982-3992.
[30] Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Boyack K, et al. How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data[J]. Plos one, 2022, 17(9): e0274693.
