[1] WHITE R, CHEUNG M. Communication of fantasy sports:a comparative study of user-generated content by professional and amateur writers[J]. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 2015, 58(2): 192-207.
[2] 李白杨, 白云, 詹希旎, 等. 人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的技术特征与形态演进[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(1): 66-74. (LI B Y, BAI Y, ZHAN X N, et al. The technical features and aromorphosis of artificial intelligence generated content(AIGC) [J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(1): 66- 74.)
[3] 国务院. 2025年政府工作报告[EB/OL]. [2025-05-30]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202503/content_7013163.htm. (THE STATE COUNCIL OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. Report on the work of the Government 2025[EB/OL]. [2025-05-30]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202503/content_7013163.htm.)
[4] 钱倩文, 李春杏, 王东毅, 等. AI时代下的焦虑之舟： ChatGPT使用中的信息焦虑产生机理探究[J]. 国家图书馆 学刊, 2024, 33(4): 42-53. (QIAN Q W, LI C X, WANG D Y, et al. The vessel of anxiety in the AI era: exploration of the mechanisms behind information anxiety in the use of ChatGPT[J]. Journal of the National Library of China, 2024, 33(4): 42-53.)
[5] 吴丹, 刘静. 人工智能时代的算法素养：内涵剖析与能力框架构建[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2022, 48(6): 43-56. (WU D, LIU J. Algorithmic literacy in the era of artificial intelligence: connotation analysis and competency framework construction[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2022, 48(6): 43-56.)
[6] 孙榕, 李白杨. 生成式人工智能（ GAI）背景下的新型数字鸿沟识别框架研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2025, 42(3): 19-30. (SUN R, LI B Y. A framework for identifying the new digital divide within the context of generative artificial intelligence(GAI)[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2025, 42(3): 19-30.)
[7] SCHMITZ K W, TENG J, WEBB K J. Capturing the complexity of malleable IT use: adaptive structuration theory for individuals[J]. MIS quarterly, 2016, 40(3): 663-686.
[8] LONG D, MAGERKO B.What is AI literacy?Competencies and design considerations[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020: 1-16.
[9] SNAVELY L, COOPER N. The information literacy debate[J]. Journal of academic librarianship, 1997, 23(1): 9-14.
[10] ZURKOWSKI P G.The information service environment relationships and priorities related paper No.5[M]. Washington DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, 1974.
[11] IANNUZZI P. Information literacy competency standards for higher education[J]. Community & junior college libraries, 2000, 9(4): 63-67.
[12] YOEAM E A. Digital literacy:a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era[J]. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia, 2004, 13(1): 93-106.
[13] JONES-KAVALIER B R, FLANNIGAN S L. Connecting the digital dots:literacy of the 21st century[J]. Educause quarterly, 2006(2): 8-10.
[14] DAVID B. Media education in the UK: moving beyond protectionism[J]. Journal of communication, 1998, 48(1): 23-43.
[15] DAVID C. An introduction to media literacy: the what, why and how to’s, the fall 1995 issue of telemedium[J]. The journal of media literacy, 2010(41): 65-72.
[16] JENKINS H. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century[M]. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2009.
[17] CARLSON J, FOSMIRE M, MILLER C C, et al. Determining data information literacy needs:a study of students and research faculty[J]. Portal-libraries and the academy, 2011, 11(2): 629- 657.
[18] PRADO J C, MARZAL M. Incorporating data literacy into information literacy programs:core competencies and contents[J]. Libri:international journal of libraries and information services, 2013, 63(2): 123-134.
[19] YOKO K. What is needed for AI literacy?[EB/OL]. [2025-05-30]. https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/columns/s16_0014.html.
[20] NG D T K, LEUNG J K L, CHU K W S, et al. AI literacy: definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021, 58(1): 504-509.
[21] LAUPICHLER M C, ASTER A, SCHIRCH J, et al. Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education:a scoping literature review[J]. Computers & education:artificial intelligence, 2022, 3: 100101.
[22] CAROLUS A, AUGUSTIN Y, MARKUS A, et al. Digital interaction literacy model-conceptualizing competencies for literate interactions with voice-based AI systems[J]. Computers & education: artificial intelligence, 2023, 4: 100114.
[23] 蔡迎春, 张静蓓, 虞晨琳, 等. 数智时代的人工智能素养：内涵、框架与实施路径[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2024, 50(4): 71- 84. (CAI Y C, ZHANG J B, YU C L, et al. Artificial intelligence literacy in the digital intelligence era: connotation, framework, and implementation pathways[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2024, 50(4): 71-84.)
[24] 张静蓓, 虞晨琳, 蔡迎春. 人工智能素养教育：全球进展与 展望 [J]. 图书 情报 知识, 2024, 41(3): 15-26. (ZHANG J B, YU C L, CAI Y C. Artificial intelligence literacy education: global progress and prospects[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2024, 41(3): 15-26.)
[25] 尹开国. 人工智能素养: 提出背景、概念界定与构成要素 [J]. 图书 与情 报, 2024(3): 60-68. (YIN K G. AI literacy: background, conceptual definition, and constituent elements[J]. Library & information, 2024(3): 60-68.)
[26] 郭亚军, 寇旭颍, 冯思倩, 等. 人工智能素养：内涵剖析与评估标准构建[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2025, 45(2): 42-50. (GUO Y J, KOU X Y, FENG S Q, et al. Artificial intelligence literacy: connotation analysis and evaluation criteria[J]. Library tribune, 2025, 45(2): 42-50.)
[27] 孙立会, 周亮. 生成式人工智能素养：概念演变、框架构建与提升路径[J]. 现代远距离教育, 2025(1): 11-21. (SUN L H, ZHOU L. Generative artificial intelligence literacy: conceptual evolution, framework construction and enhancement paths[J]. Modern distance education, 2025(1): 11-21.)
[28] HEYDER T, POSEGGA O. Extending the foundations of AI literacy[EB/OL]. [2025-05-30]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357511112_Extending_the_foundations_of_AI_ literacy_Research-in-Progress.
[29] 杨鸿武, 张笛, 郭威彤. STEM背景下人工智能素养框架的研 究[J]. 电化 教育 研究， 2022, 43(4): 26-32. (YANG H W, ZHANG D, GUO W T. A study of literacy framework of artificial intelligence in STEM context [J]. E-education research, 2022, 43(4): 26-32.)
[30] WANG B, RAU P L P, YUAN T. Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence:validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale[J]. Behaviour&information technology, 2023, 42(9): 1324-1337.
[31] DESANCTIS G, POOLE M S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory[J]. Organization science, 1994, 5(2): 121-147.
[32] AGARWAL R, PRASAD J. A Conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology[J]. Information systems research, 1998, 9(2): 204-215.
[33] HAH H, GOLDIN D, HA S J. The association between willingness of frontline care providers’ to adaptively use telehealth technology and virtual service performance in provider-to-provider communication:quantitative study[J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2019, 21(8): e15087.
[34] BRAVO E R, OSTOS J. Individual adaptive performance in computer-mediated work:a migration perspective[J]. Information technology&people, 2020, 34(1): 123-146.
[35] SHAO Z, LI X.The influences of three task characteristics on innovative use of malleable IT:an extension of adaptive structuration theory for individuals[J]. Information & management, 2022, 59(3): 103597.
[36] SHAO Z, BENITEZ J, ZHANG J, et al. Antecedents and performance outcomes of employees’ data analytics skills:an adaptation structuration theory-based empirical investigation[J]. European journal of information systems, 2023, 32(6): 921-940.
[37] 王萍, 蒋健, 曹高辉. 老年用户适应智能技术的影响因素—— 基于微博文本定向内容的分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(4): 126-139. (WANG P, JIANG J, CAO G H. Factors influencing the adaptative use of intelligent technology among elderly users: directed content analysis of Weibo text [J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2022, 39(4): 126-139.)
[38] CORBIN J M, STRAUSS A L. Basics of qualitative research:techniques and procedures for develoing grounded theory[M]. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2008.
[39] 王庆娟, 朱征, 张金成, 等. 晋升公平概念及效用机制的探索 —— 一项质性研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(5): 157- 171. (WANG Q J, ZHU Z, ZHANG J C, et al. Investigating the construct and working paths of promotion justice: a qualitative study[J]. Nankai business review, 2023, 26(5): 157-171.)
[40] 张宁, 才国伟. 国有资本投资运营公司双向治理路径研究 —— 基于沪深两地治理实践的探索性扎根理论分析[J]. 管理 世界, 2021, 37(1): 108-127, 8. (ZHANG N, CAI G W. Study on the bidirectional governance path of state-owned capital investment operating companies: exploratory analysis using grounded theory based on governance practices in Shanghai&Shenzhen[J]. Journal of management world, 2021, 37(1): 108-127, 8.)
[41] 贾明霞, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华, 等. 双系统理论视角下用户数字囤积行为的形成机理与演化路径研究[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(3): 339-356. (JIA M X, ZHAO Y X, ZHU Q H, et al. Formation and evolution path of user’s digital hoarding behavior: a dual-system theory perspective[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2024, 43(3): 339-356.)
[42] 乐承毅, 朱欣雅. 在线品牌社区用户参与价值共创的互动行为转换机制—— 基于扎根理论的研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2023, 13(3): 124-139. (LE C Y, ZHU X Y. Online brand community users’ interaction behavior transformation mechanism for value co-creation:based on grounded theory[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2023, 13(3): 124-139.)
[43] BHATTACHERJEE A, PREMKUMAR G.Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage:a theoretical model and longitudinal test[J]. MIS quarterly, 2004, 8(2): 229-254.
[44] 袁红, 黄庆庆. 数字弱势群体数字排斥的关键影响因素与政策优化研究—— 基于理论— 政策协同度视角[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2025, 48(1): 104-113. (YUAN H, HUANG Q Q. The key influencing factors of digital exclusion of the digital vulnerable groups and policy optimization:perspective of theorypolicy coordination degree[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2025, 48(1): 104-113.)
[45] DAWSON-TUNIK T L, FISCHER K W, STEIN Z.Do stages belong at the center of developmental theory?A commentary on piaget’s stages[J]. New ideas in psychology, 2004, 22(3): 255- 263.
[46] GOODHU D L, THOMPSON R L.Task-technology fit and individual performance[J]. MIS quarterly, 1995, 19(2): 213-236.
[47] OLIVER R L.A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1980, 17(4): 460-469.
