[1] 苏新宁. 学术资源库建设和学术评价[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2018, 14(12): 2-10. (SU X N. Academic resource database construction and academic evaluation[J]. Digital library forum, 2018, 14(12): 2-10.)
[2] STRONG D M, LEE Y W, WANG R Y.Data quality in context[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1997, 40(5): 103-110.
[3] 清华大学图书馆. 清华大学图书馆AI服务新体验[EB/OL]. [2025-07-26]. https://lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1073/6869.htm. (Tsinghua University Library. New AI service experience at Tsinghua University Library [EB/OL]. [2025-07-26]. https://lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1073/6869.htm.)
[4] 澳门 科技 大学. WeMust[EB/OL]. [2025-07-26]. https://itdo.must.edu.mo/page/WeMust.html. (Macau University of Science and Technology. WeMust[EB/OL]. [2025-07-26]. https://itdo.must.edu.mo/page/WeMust.html.)
[5] 袁虎声, 唐嘉乐, 赵洗尘, 等. ChatLib: 重构智慧图书馆知识服务平台[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2024, 42(2): 72-80. (YUAN H S, TANG J L, ZHAO X C, et al. ChatLib: revolutionizing the knowledge service platform of smart library[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2024, 42(2): 72-80.)
[6] 中国 知网. CNKI AI学术 研究 助手 [EB/OL]. [2025-07- 26]. https://aiplus.cnki.net/. (China National Knowledge Infrastructure. CNKI AI academic research assistant [EB/OL]. [2025-07-26]. https://aiplus.cnki.net/.)
[7] 宋明珍, 徐润婕, 王鹏涛. AIGC学术知识服务的信息质量风险识别与治理[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44(8): 89-98. (SONG M Z, XU R J, WANG P T. Research on information quality risk identification and governance of AIGC academic knowledge service[J]. Journal of modern information, 2024, 44(8): 89-98.)
[8] 莫祖英, 盘大清, 刘欢, 等. 信息质量视角下AIGC虚假信息问题及根源分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(4): 32-40. (MO Z Y, PAN D Q, LIU H, et al. Analysis on AIGC false information problem and root cause from the perspective of information quality[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2023, 40(4): 32-40.)
[9] WANG T, LI L, CHEN X, et al. A study on the risks and countermeasures of false information caused by AIGC[J]. Journal of electrical systems, 2024, 20(3): 420-426.
[10] 漆晨航. 生成式人工智能的虚假信息风险特征及其治理路 径[J]. 情报 理论 与实 践, 2024, 47(3): 112-120. (QI C H. Research on the risks of disinformation from generative artificial intelligence and its governance paths[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2024, 47(3): 112-120.)
[11] 张新生, 王润周, 马玉龙. AIGC背景下虚假信息治理挑战、机会与策略研究[J]. 情报科学, 2025, 43(5): 78-88, 96. (ZHANG X S, WANG R Z, MA Y L. Challenges, opportunities and strategies of misinformation governance at AIGC background[J]. Information science, 2025, 43(5): 78-88, 96.)
[12] 常琳, 叶凤云. 生成式人工智能用户虚假信息规避行为研究 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2025, 48(2): 102-112. (CHANG L, YE F Y. Research on false information avoidance behavior of generative artificial intelligence users[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2025, 48(2): 102-112.)
[13] 刘思琦, 邝苗苗, 肖玥, 等. AIGC情境下科研工作者信息焦虑影响机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(11): 123-135. (LIU S Q, KUANG M M, XIAO Y, et al. Research on the impact mechanism of information anxiety on researchers in AIGC context[J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(11): 123- 135.)
[14] YANG X, DING J, CHEN H, et al. Factors affecting the use of artificial intelligence generated content by subject librarians: a qualitative study[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(8): e29584.
[15] ALTMAE S, SOLA-LEYVA A, SALUMETS A. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?[J]. Reproductive biomedicine online, 2023, 47(1): 3-9.
[16] JOCELYN G, MADELEINE D, ESLI O. Learning to fake it: limited responses and fabricated references provided by ChatGPT for medical questions[J]. Mayo clinic proceedings: digital health, 2023, 1(3): 226-234.
[17] 孙立新. 风险管理: 理论与实务[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 2019. (SUN L X. Enterprise risk management theory & practice [M]. Beijing: Economic Management Press, 2019.)
[18] 王小艳. 专题类学术资源库建设: 社科类出版单位数字化实践的重要面向[J]. 科技与出版, 2024(1): 96-102. (WANG X Y. Construction of thematic academic resource library: an important aspect of digital practice in social science publishing units [J]. Science and publication, 2024(1): 96-102.)
[19] 夏昊翔, 王众托, 党延忠. 关于信息系统概念基础的一点思考[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2001(10): 17-24. (XIA H X, WANG Z T, DANG Y Z. On the conceptual foundation of information systems[J]. Systems engineering - theory & practice, 2001(10): 17-24.)
[20] WANG R Y, STRONG D M. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers[J] Journal of management information systems, 1996, 12(4): 5-33.
[21] 莫祖英. 国内外信息质量研究述评[J]. 情报资料工作, 2015(2): 29-36. (MO Z Y. Review of information quality research at home and abroad[J]. Information and documentation service, 2015(2): 29-36.)
[22] 郭亚军, 刘振阳, 冯思倩, 等. AIGC质量评估指标体系构建研究—— 以ChatGPT为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(22): 93-104. (GUO Y J, LIU Z Y, FENG S Q, et al. Research on the construction of quality evaluation index system of AIGC: taking ChatGPT as an example[J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(22): 93-104.)
[23] 苏君华, 杜念. 国外应急信息质量评价研究进展与趋势思考 [J]. 图书情报知识, 2024, 41(1): 143-154. (SU J H, DU N. Research progress and trends of foreign emergency information quality evaluation[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2024, 41(1): 143-154.)
[24] 喻国明, 滕文强. 发展可解释的人工智能：韧性视域下AIGC时代数字不平等的社会性构建与治理路径[J]. 当代传 播, 2024(4): 10-14. (YU G M, TENG W Q. Developing explainable artificial intelligence: the social construction and governance path of digital inequality in the AIGC era from the perspective of resilience [J]. Contemporary communication, 2024(4): 10-14.)
[25] KRISTIN T, ANDREAS J K, RINGDAL K G, et al. Data quality of Glasgow coma scale and systolic blood pressure in scientific studies involving physician-staffed emergency medical services: Systematic review[J]. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2020, 64(7): 888-909.
[26] SENARATNE H, MOBASHERI A, ALI L A, et al. A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods[J]. International journal of geographical information science, 2016, 31(1): 139-167.
[27] MEHRNAZ M, HALEH A, DAVOUD A K. Data quality assessment in emergency medical services: what are the stakeholders’ perspectives?[J]. Perspectives in health information management, 2019, 16(Winter): 1c.
[28] ANAGHA K, MIKE W, TEJASVI B, et al. Quantifying the quality of web-based health information on student health center websites using a software tool: design and development study[J]. JMIR formative research, 2022, 6(2): e32360-e32360.
[29] SENARATNE H, MOBASHERI A, ALI A, et al. A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods[J]. International journal of geographical information science, 2016, 31(1): 139-167.
[30] GERGEOVA B M, KUZEVIOVA Z, LABANT S, et al. Evaluation of selected sub-elements of spatial data quality on 3D flood event modeling: case study of Preov City, Slovakia[J]. Applied sciences, 2020, 10(3): 820.
[31] 曹树金, 曹茹烨. 从ChatGPT看生成式AI对情报学研究与实践的影响[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(4): 3-10. (CAO S J, CAO R Y. Influence of generative AI on the research and practice of information science from the perspective of ChatGPT[J]. Journal of modern information, 2023, 43(4): 3-10.)
[32] BECERRA M A, URIBE Y, PELUFFO-ORDONEZ D H, et al. Information fusion and information quality assessment for environmental forecasting[J]. Urban climate, 2021, 39: e100960.
[33] LIU C, TIAN Q, ZHU X. Social media emergency information assessment of major emergencies: a case study of additional emotional characteristics[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2023, 41(3): 939- 968.
[34] 刘艳红. 人工智能的可解释性与AI的法律责任问题研究[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2022, 28(1): 78-91. (LIU Y H. On the explainability and legal liability of artificial intelligence[J]. Law and social development, 2022, 28(1): 78-91.)
[35] REUTER C, LUDWIG T, RITZKATIS M, et al. SocialQAS: tailorable quality assessment service for social media content[M]//End-User Development. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015: 156-170.
[36] LING L, EUAN M, JULIANA I, et al. Assessing data integration and quality for the evaluation of point-of-care testing across rural and remote emergency departments in Australia[J]. Studies in health technology and informatics, 2017, 245: 471-475.
[37] EMILY D, REBECCA L, A S M. Development of principles for health-related information on social media: Delphi study[J]. Journal of medical Internet research, 2022, 24(9): e37337-e37337.
[38] 张一, 皮雯旭, 吴泽贤, 等. 在线学习行为评价框架: 基于模糊层次分析法和模糊综合评价法[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024(5): 1-10. (ZHANG Y, PI W X, WU Z X, et al. An online learning behavior evaluation framework: Based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2024(5): 1-10.)
[39] 储节旺, 周艳, 罗怡帆. AIGC失范表现与治理机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2025, 69(3): 37-46. (CHU J W, ZHOU Y, LUO Y F. Research on the misconduct behaviors and governance mechanisms of AIGC[J]. Library and information service, 2025, 69(3): 37-46.)
[40] 徐凌验. 大模型安全风险及治理路径研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2024, 10(10): 975-980. (XU L Y. Research on security risk and governance path of large models[J]. Journal of information security research, 2024, 10(10): 975-980.)
[41] 李旭光, 胡奕, 王曼, 等. 人工智能生成内容研究综述：应用、风险与治理[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(17): 136-149. (LI X G, HU Y, WANG M, et al. A review of AI-generated content research: applications, risks, and governance[J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(17): 136-149.)
[42] 王晰巍, 李玛莉, 赵阳, 等. 新质生产力战略下AIGC赋能的知识和情报服务创新：新机制、新风险与新路径[J]. 现代情报, 2024, 44(12): 3-14. (WANG X W, LI M L, ZHAO Y, et al. Service innovation of knowledge and intelligence enabled by AIGC under the new quality productive force strategy: new mechanisms, new risks and new paths[J]. Journal of modern information, 2024, 44(12): 3-14.)
[43] The IEEE Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems.Ethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems (version 1-for public discussion)[R/OL]. (2023-12-13)[2025-07-26]. http://standards.ieee.org/develop/indconn/ec/autonomous_systems.html.
[44] The IEEE Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems. Ethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems (version 2-for public discussion)[R/OL]. (2023-12-13)[2025-07-26]. http://standards.ieee.org/develop/indconn/ec/autonomous_systems.html.
[45] SHAHRIARI K, SHAHRIARI M. IEEE standard reviewethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems[C]//2017 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC), Toronto, ON, Canada: IEEE, 2017: 197-201.
