[1] STONE G P, MERTON R K. Social theory and social structure[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1958, 2(4): 556.
[2] 吕海华, 李江. 知识扩散中的“常识化后免于引用”现象：一项评述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(8): 12-19. (LYU H H, LI J. Review of “obliteration by incorporation” in knowledge diffusion[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2022, 6(8): 12-19.)
[3] 林聚任. 站在巨人的肩上——读默顿《社会理论和社会结构》[J]. 中国图书评论, 2007(10): 61-65. (LIN J R. Standing on the shoulders of giants: reading Merton’s Social theory and social structure[J]. China book review, 2007, 30(10): 61-65.)
[4] 罗纳德·鲁索, 利奥·埃格赫, 拉夫·冈斯. 智慧计量：科学计量学使用指南[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2023:92. (ROUSSEAU R, EGGHE L, GUNS R. Becoming metric-wise: a bibliometric guide for researchers[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2023: 92.)
[5] MERTON R K. The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property[J]. ISIS, 1988, 79(4): 606-623.
[6] GARFIELD E, WELLJAMS-DOROF A. Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making[J]. Science and public policy, 1992, 19(5): 321-327.
[7] SMALL H G. Cited documents as concept symbols[J]. Social studies of science, 1978, 8(3): 327-340.
[8] MARX W, CARDONA M. The citation impact outside references: formal versus informal citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(1): 1-21.
[9] MCCAIN K W. Eponymy and obliteration by incorporation: the case of the “Nash equilibrium”[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(7): 1412-1424.
[10] MCCAIN K W. Assessing obliteration by incorporation in a full-text database: JSTOR, Economics, and the concept of “bounded rationality”[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1445-1459.
[11] MCCAIN K W. Mining full-text journal articles to assess obliteration by incorporation: Herbert A. Simon’s concepts of bounded rationality and satisficing in economics, management, and psychology[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(11): 2187-2201.
[12] GORRAIZ J, GUMPENBERGER C, WIELAND M. Galton 2011 revisited: a bibliometric journey in the footprints of a universal genius[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(2): 627-652.
[13] 吕海华, 李江. “常识化后免于引用”现象的测度研究——以马太效应为例[J]. 图书情报知识, 2024, 41(6): 102-112. (LYU H H, LI J. The measurement of the “obliteration by incorporation” phenomenon: a case of Matthew effect[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2024, 41(6): 102-112.)
[14] MENG X, VAROL O, BARABÁSI A L. Hidden citations obscure true impact in science[J]. PNAS nexus, 2024, 3(5): 155-164.
[15] LIN J, YU Y, SONG J, et al. Detecting and analyzing missing citations to published scientific entities[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(5): 2395-2412.
[16] SAIER T, FÄRBER M. unarXive: a large scholarly data set with publications’ full-text, annotated in-text citations, and links to metadata[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(3): 3085-3108.
[17] 罗伯特·K·默顿. 社会理论和社会结构[M]. 南京: 译林出版社, 2006: 46. (MERTON R K. Social theory and social structure[M]. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2006: 46.)
[18] GARFIELD E. Uncitedness-III- Importance of not being cited[J]. Current contents/life sciences, 1973, 16(8): 5-6.
[19] GARFIELD E. Obliteration phenomenon in science and advantage of being obliterated[J]. Current contents/life sciences, 1975, 51(5): 5-7.
[20] 张素芳, 刘慧敏. 单篇论文被引频次影响因素及预测研究综述[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2022, 7(3): 299-313. (ZHANG S F, LIU H M. A review of research on influencing factors and prediction of citation frequency of a single paper[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2022, 7(3): 299-313)
[21] WAGNER C S, JONKERS K. Open countries have strong science[J]. Nature, 2017, 550(7674): 32-33.
[22] BACCINI A, DE NICOLAO G, PETROVICH E. Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country-level comparative analysis[J]. PLOS one, 2019, 14(9): e0221212.
[23] HARWOOD N. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines[J]. Journal of pragmatics, 2009, 41(3): 497-518.
[24] 王海燕, 马峥, 潘云涛, 等. 高被引论文与“睡美人”论文引用曲线及影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(16): 83-89. (WANG H Y, MA Z, PAN Y T, et al. Study on citation curves of highly-cited articles with sleeping beauties articles[J]. Library and information service, 2015, 59(16): 83-89.)
[25] 刘玉仙, 武夷山. 关于引文本质的思考[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(12): 1779-1786, 1882. (LIU Y X, WU Y S. On essence of citations[J]. Studies in science of science, 2015, 33(12): 1779-1786, 1882.)
[26] 崔蕴学, 王贤文, 王勇臻. 归因理论视角下的学术引用行为研究：梳理与评析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(7): 168-177. (CUN Y X, WANG X W, WANG Y Z. New insights into scholarly citation behaviors: a perspective from attribution theory[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(7): 168-177.)
[27] MA A, LIU Y, XU X, et al. A deep-learning based citation count prediction model with paper metadata semantic features[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(8): 6803-6823.
[28] DEERWESTER S, DUMAIS S T, FURNAS G W, et al. Indexing by latent semantic analysis[J]. Journal of the American society for information science, 1990, 41(6): 391-407.
[29] MIKOLOV T, CHEN K, CORRADO G, et al. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space[J]. Computer science, 2013.
[30] PENNINGTON J, SOCHER R, MANNING C. Glove: global vectors for word representation[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). Doha: Association for computational linguistics, 2014: 1532-1543.
[31] DEVLIN J, CHANG M W, LEE K, et al. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceeding of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies. Minneapolis: Association for computational linguistics, 2019: 4171-4186.
[32] PETERS M E, NEUMANN M, IYER M, et al. Deep contextualized word representations [C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies. New Orleans: Association for computational linguistics, 2018: 2227-2237.
[33] VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]//Advances in neural information processing systems. Long Beach: Curran Associates, Inc, 2017: 5998-6008.
[34] HAMILTON W L, LESKOVEC J, JURAFSKY D. Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change[C]//Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016: 1489-1501.
[35] 巴志超, 杨子江, 朱世伟, 等. 基于关键词语义网络的领域主题演化分析方法研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(3): 67-72. (BA Z C, YANG Z J, ZHU S W, et al. Research on the domain theme evolution analysis based on keywords semantic network[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2016, 39(3): 67-72.)
[36] HAMILTON W L, LESKOVEC J, JURAFSKY D. Cultural shift or linguistic drift? Comparing two computational measures of semantic change[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Austin: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016: 2116-2124.
[37] SONI S, LERMAN K, EISENSTEIN J. Follow the leader: documents on the leading edge of semantic change get more citations[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2021, 72(4): 478-492.
[38] TOUBIA O, BERGER J, ELIASHBERG J. How quantifying the shape of stories predicts their success[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2021, 118(26): e2011695118.
[39] 步一, 黄圣智, 黄永, 等. 学者研究主题演化的时空测度：速度、覆盖度和迂回度[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(24): 84-91. (BU Y, HUANG S Z, HUANG Y, et al. Temporal-spatial measurements for research topic evolution of researchers: speed, volume, and circuitousness[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(24): 84-91.)
[40] PETROVICH E, VERHAEGH S, BÖS G, et al. Bibliometrics beyond citations: introducing mention extraction and analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(9): 5731-5768.
[41] REIMERS N, GUREVYCH I. Sentence-BERT: sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing. Hong Kong: Association for computational linguistics, 2019: 3980-3990.
[42] ZHANG F, WU S. Predicting citation impact of academic papers across research areas using multiple models and early citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2024, 129(7): 4137-4166.
[43] SAIER T, FÄRBER M, TSERETELI T. Cross-lingual citations in English papers: a large-scale analysis of prevalence, usage, and impact[J]. International journal on digital libraries, 2022, 23(2): 179-195.
[44] BLEI D M, NG A Y, JORDAN M I. Latent Dirichlet allocation[J]. The journal of machine learning research, 2003(3): 993-1022.
[45] 李江, 姜明利, 李玥婷.引文曲线的分析框架研究——以诺贝尔奖得主的引文曲线为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(2): 41-49. (LI J, JIANG M L, LI Y T. Citation curves of Nobel laureates[J]. Journal of library science in china, 2014, 40(2): 41-49.)
[46] KEDRICK K, LEVITSKAYA E, FUNK R J. Conceptual structure and the growth of scientific knowledge[J]. Nature human behaviour, 2024, 8(10): 1915-1923.
[47] POLCHINSKI J. Dirichlet-branes and Ramond-Ramond charges[J]. Physical review letters, 1995, 75(26): 4724-4727.
[48] CHEN B, DING Y, MA F. Semantic word shifts in a scientific domain[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(1): 211-226.
[49] SMALL H. On the shoulders of Robert Merton: towards a normative theory of citation[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 60(1): 71-79.
[50] VARGA A. Shorter distances between papers over time are due to more cross-field references and increased citation rate to higher-impact papers[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2019, 116(44): 22094-22099.
[51] NEKRASOV N A. Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting[J]. Advances in theoretical and mathematical physics, 2002, 7(5): 831-864.
