REVIEW

Science and Technology Security Research from a Macro Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Li Gang ,
  • Jiang Siwen ,
  • Sun Jie ,
  • Mao Jin
Expand
  • 1 School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072;
    2 Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072
Li Gang, Professor, PhD, Doctoral Supervisor; Jiang Siwen, Master’s Candidate; Sun Jie, Doctoral Candidate; Mao Jin, AssociateProfessor, PhD, Doctoral Supervisor, Corresponding Author, E-mail: danveno@163.com.

Received date: 2025-07-22

  Revised date: 2025-09-11

  Online published: 2026-09-08

Supported by

This work is supported by the major project of National Social Science Fund of China, titled “Research on National Competition in the Field of Science and Technology Security from the Perspective of Information Science” (Grant No. 23&ZD222).

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Science and technology security is a key support for maintaining national security and shaping competitive advantages. Systematically reviewing the domestic and international research progress on science and technology security from a macro perspective is of great significance for promoting the deepening of academic research and practical innovation in science and technology security. [Method/Process] Using a systematic literature review method, this study evaluates the research on science and technology security from four dimensions: conceptual characteristics, risk challenges, evaluation systems and countermeasure pathways. It also summarizes the limitations of current studies and outlines future research directions. [Result/Conclusion] Academic research on science and technology security is becoming increasingly active, mainly focusing on the connotation and morphological characteristics of its core concepts, the external and internal environmental risks they faced, the multidimensional indicator systems, methods and data, as well as the principles and specific measures of science and technology security governance. However, overall, it is still in the initial exploration stage, with problems such as the lack of a comprehensive theoretical framework, relatively weak research on risk transmission mechanisms, insufficient comparability and applicability of evaluation systems, and inadequate analysis of countermeasures in specific contexts. In the future, further exploration should focus on building a theoretical framework of science and technology security in the context of great power competition, establishing a dynamic risk monitoring and intelligent early-warning system, and constructing precise, differentiated and scientific risk prevention strategies.

Cite this article

Li Gang , Jiang Siwen , Sun Jie , Mao Jin . Science and Technology Security Research from a Macro Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review[J]. Library and Information Service, 2026 , 70(18) : 133 -145 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2026.18.010

References

[1] 程骋,江岚,黄弘毅.总体国家安全观视阈下科技安全的法律保障[J].科技进步与对策, 2025, 42(13): 131-138. (CHENG C, JIANG L, HUANG H Y. Legal protection of scientific and technological security from the holistic perspective of national security[J]. Science & technology progress and policy, 2025, 42(13): 131-138.)
[2] 连燕华,马维野.科技安全:国家安全的新概念[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 1998(11): 20-22. (LIAN Y H, MA W Y. Science and technology security: a new concept of national security[J]. Science of science and management of S.& T., 1998(11): 20-22.)
[3] 傅晋华.科技安全概念演化、问题辨析与体系构建研究[J].科学学研究, 2024, 42(9): 1824-1832, 1876. (FU J H. Research on concept evolution, issues analysis and system construction of science and technology security[J]. Studies in science of science, 2024, 42(9): 1824-1832, 1876.)
[4] TUNGA R L, ZANDERB I, FANGC T. The Tech Cold War, the multipolarization of the world economy, and IB research[J]. International business review, 2023, 32(6): 102195.
[5] SEIDL T, SCHMITZ L. Moving on to not fall behind? Technological sovereignty and the “geo-dirigiste” turn in EU industrial policy[J]. Journal of European public policy, 2023, 31(8): 2147-2174.
[6] KOLASKI K, LOGAN L R, IOANNIDIS J P A. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews[J]. Systematic reviews, 2023, 12(1): 1-29.
[7] 肖君拥,杨勇.总体国家安全观视阈下科技安全概念诠释[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(1): 162-173. (XIAO J Y, YANG Y. Interpretation of the concept of science and technology security from the perspective of the overall national security concept[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(social sciences edition), 2025, 27(1): 162-173.)
[8] 杨名刚.和谐:中国特色社会主义科技安全诉求的伦理维度[J].学术论坛, 2012, 35(4): 56-59. (YANG M G. Harmony: the ethical dimension of the demand for science and technology security in socialism with Chinese characteristics[J]. Academic forum, 2012, 35(4): 56-59.)
[9] 胡雅萍,刘千里,潘彬彬.维护科技安全的情报预测研究[J].情报杂志, 2014, 33(9): 8-12, 7. (HU Y P, LIU Q L, PAN B B. Research on prediction of intelligence for science and technology security[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2014, 33(9): 8-12, 7.)
[10] 曾文,李辉,李享,等.服务于国家科技安全的科技情报研究思考[J].情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(6): 34-38. (ZENG W, LI H, LI X, et al. Research on scientific and technological information serving for national science and technology security[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2018, 41(6): 34-38.)
[11] 张家年,马费成.科技安全的分析模型及其核心要素表征[J].中国科技论坛, 2020(5): 32-40. (ZHANG J N, MA F C. Analytical model and representation of the core elements of science and technology security[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2020(5): 32-40.)
[12] 马维野.科技安全和我国面临的主要挑战与对策[J].中国软科学, 2003(4): 94-99. (MA W Y. Technology security and the major challenges to China[J]. China soft science, 2003(4): 94-99.)
[13] 林聪榕,李自力.关于科技安全问题的理论思考[J].科技管理研究, 2007(12): 68-70. (LIN C R, LI Z L. Theoretical reflections on science and technology security issues[J]. Science and technology management research, 2007(12): 68-70.)
[14] 石彪,刘海波.构建开放、协调、可持续的科技安全文化[J].科学与社会, 2017, 7(2): 27-34. (SHI B, LIU H B. Construction of open, coordinated and sustainable culture of S&T security[J]. Science and society, 2017, 7(2): 27-34.)
[15] 刘鑫,李雪,陈凯华.国家科技安全:风险解构、系统韧性与实现路径[J].科学学研究, 2025, 43(1): 14-25. (LIU X, LI X, CHEN K H. National scientific and technological security: risk deconstruction, system resilience and implementation path[J]. Studies in science of science, 2025, 43(1): 14-25.)
[16] 郭秋怡,张斌,武宇.面向科技安全的技术预见方法初探[J].中国科技论坛, 2020(11): 180-188. (GUO Q Y, ZHANG B, WU Y. A preliminary study on technology foresight method for science and technology security[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2020(11): 180-188.)
[17] 李品.统筹科技发展与科技安全的情报体系框架研究[J].情报学报, 2024, 43(3): 357-368. (LI P. Constructing the framework of an intelligence theory system for coordinating science and technology development and science and technology security[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2024, 43(3): 357-368.)
[18] 叶淑兰.战略科技力量与大国兴衰的逻辑——以二战后美国科技博弈为例[J].亚太安全与海洋研究, 2024(5): 20-36, 133. (YE S L. Strategic science and technology forces and the logic of the rise and fall of major countries: the example of the US game of science and technology after World War Two[J]. Asia-Pacific security and maritime affairs, 2024(5): 20-36, 133.)
[19] 程志波.当代西方技术民族主义的本质意涵与表现类型[J].科学学研究, 2024, 42(3): 484-491. (CHENG Z B. The essential meaning and types of expression of contemporary Western techno-nationalism[J]. Studies in science of science, 2024, 42(3): 484-491.)
[20] 安维复.技术民族主义学理性考察——重建全球共享的国家创新体系[J].人民论坛, 2020(36): 44-47. (AN W F. A rational examination of techno-nationalism: rebuilding a globally shared national innovation system[J]. People’s tribune, 2020(36): 44-47.)
[21] 徐菲,石斌.技术民族主义及其对美国对华科技政策的塑造[J].当代美国评论, 2024, 8(2): 60-81, 127-128. (XU F, SHI B. Techno-nationalism and its influence on U.S. technology policy towards China[J]. Contemporary American review, 2024, 8(2): 60-81, 127-128.)
[22] MASHAYEKH J. Techno-regionalism in the post-globalization era: linking technological cooperation and geopolitical tensions[J]. Asian journal of technology innovation, 2025:1–30.
[23] 余南平,戢仕铭.技术民族主义对全球价值链的影响分析——以全球半导体产业为例[J].国际展望, 2021, 13(1): 67-87, 155-156. (YU N P, JI S M. Techno-nationalism and its impact on global value chains: a case study of the global chip industry[J]. Global review, 2021, 13(1): 67-87, 155-156.)
[24] 肖冬梅,王良晨.美国技术民族主义制度对中国产业发展的挑战及应对[J].科技进步与对策, 2025, 42(17): 44-54. (XIAO D M, WANG L C. Challenges and countermeasures of U.S. techno-nationalism system on the development of China’s industries[J]. Science & technology progress and policy, 2025, 42(17): 44-54.)
[25] KHAN R.The impact of a new techno-nationalism era on ecoeconomic decoupling[J]. Resources policy, 2023, 82:103452.
[26] 程志波,李龙.美国智库对技术民族主义问题的研究[J].智库理论与实践, 2023, 8(5): 158-166. (CHENG Z B, LI L. Studies of techno-nationalism by think tanks in the United States[J]. Think tank: theory & practice, 2023, 8(5): 158-166.)
[27] 石立春.当代中国技术民族主义思潮的兴起及应对研究[J].思想理论教育, 2021(1): 41-46. (SHI L C. The rise of the trend of thought of technological nationalism in contemporary China and countermeasures[J]. Ideological & theoretical education, 2021(1): 41-46.)
[28] 文洋,窦玉根.百年大变局下技术民族主义的表现、影响及因应[J].理论视野, 2022(4): 51-57. (WEN Y, DOU Y G. The performance, influence, and response of technical nationalism of great changes in the rare grand times of China[J]. Theoretical horizon, 2022(4): 51-57.)
[29] 蔡翠红,李煜华.科技右翼与美国科技安全战略转型[J].国际安全研究, 2025, 43(3): 3-34, 154. (CAI C H, LI Y H. The tech right and the transformation of U.S. technology security strategy[J]. Journal of international security studies, 2025, 43(3): 3-34, 154.)
[30] LUO Y. Illusions of techno-nationalism[J]. Journal of international business studies, 2022, 53(3): 550-567.
[31] 林娴岚.技术民族主义与美国对苏联、日本的高技术遏制[J].世界经济与政治, 2021(12): 130-154, 159-160. (LIN X L. Techno-nationalism and the high-tech containment of the United States against the Soviet Union and Japan[J]. World economics and politics, 2021(12): 130-154, 159-160.)
[32] 孙海泳.进攻性技术民族主义与美国对华科技战[J].国际展望, 2020, 12(5): 46-64, 158-159. (SUN H Y. Offensive technonationalism and China-U.S. tech war[J]. Global review, 2020, 12(5): 46-64, 158-159.)
[33] KENNEDY A B. China’s search for renewable energy: Pragmatic techno-nationalism[J]. Asian survey, 2013, 53(5): 909-930.
[34] 高际香.大国科技竞争背景下俄罗斯强化技术主权的实践与启示[J].俄罗斯东欧中亚研究, 2024(1): 93-114, 165. (GAO J X. Russia’s strengthening of technological sovereignty under the background of science and technology competition among great powers: practice and enlightenment[J]. Russian, East European and Central Asian studies, 2024(1): 93-114, 165.)
[35] 蔡翠红,张若扬.“技术主权”和“数字主权”话语下的欧盟数字化转型战略[J].国际政治研究, 2022, 43(1): 9-36, 5. (CAI C H, ZHANG R Y. The EU’s digital transformation strategy in the context of “tech sovereignty” and “digital sovereignty” discourse[J]. The journal of international studies, 2022, 43(1): 9-36, 5.)
[36] CSERNATONI R. The EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: from European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty[J]. European security, 2022, 31(3): 395-414.
[37] DA PONTE A, LEON G, ALVAREZ I. Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: an empirical approach[J]. Telecommunications policy, 2023, 47(1): 102459.
[38] EDLER J, BLIND K, KROLL H, et al. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means[J]. Research policy, 2023, 52(6): 104765.
[39] 忻华.“欧洲经济主权与技术主权”的战略内涵分析[J].欧洲研究, 2020, 38(4): 1-30. (XIN H. A structured analysis on the strategic implications of the European economic sovereignty and technological sovereignty[J]. Chinese journal of European studies, 2020, 38(4): 1-30.)
[40] BLIND K. Standardization and standards: safeguards of technological sovereignty?[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2025, 210:123873.
[41] 李峥.全球新一轮技术民族主义及其影响[J].现代国际关系, 2021(3): 31-39, 64. (LI Z. A new round of global technological nationalism and its influence[J]. Contemporary international relations, 2021(3): 31-39, 64.)
[42] 段光鹏.数字帝国主义时代的科技霸权扩张及其应对[J].科学社会主义, 2024(2): 4-13. (DUAN G P. The expansion of technological hegemony in the era of digital imperialism and its response[J]. Scientific socialism, 2024(2): 4-13.)
[43] 潘正祥,杨迎会.全球化时代科技安全和我国面临的挑战[J].未来与发展, 2007(1): 2-6. (PAN Z X, YANG Y H. Technology security in the globalization era and the challenges of our nation[J]. Future and development, 2007(1): 2-6.)
[44] MONTRESOR S. Techno-globalism, techno-nationalism and technological systems: organizing the evidence[J]. Technovation, 2001, 21(7): 399-412.
[45] 赵世军,董晓辉.新时代我国科技安全风险的成因分析及应对策略[J].科学管理研究, 2021, 39(3): 27-32. (ZHAO S J, DONG X H. Causes analysis and countermeasures of science and technology security risks in China in the new era[J]. Scientific management research, 2021, 39(3): 27-32.)
[46] 王君,李品,李璟致.众包情报的四象限模型在科技安全风险预警中的应用[J].情报杂志, 2024, 43(5): 116-122. (WANG J, LI P, LI J Z. The application of the four quadrant model of crowdsourcing intelligence in scientific and technological security risk warning[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2024, 43(5): 116-122.)
[47] 韩文艳,房俊民.科技安全背景下美欧出口管制政策机制的演变与启示[J].情报杂志, 2024, 43(5): 54-63, 151. (HAN W Y, FANG J M. Evolution and enlightenment of US and EU’s export control policy mechanism under the background of science and technology security[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2024, 43(5): 54-63, 151.)
[48] 秦渝斌,江天骄.拜登政府对华技术地缘政治竞争——限度与应对[J].国际展望, 2023, 15(3): 73-94, 155-156. (QIN Y B, JIANG T J. Geopolitical technology competition: limits and countermeasures in the Biden administration’s approach to China[J]. Global review, 2023, 15(3): 73-94, 155-156.)
[49] 刘彦君,张鑫,陆桂军,等.美国对中国科技创新研判的历史变迁与未来走向——基于《美国中国经济安全审查委员会(USCC)年报》的分析[J].情报杂志, 2020, 39(7): 29-35, 22. (LIU Y J, ZHANG X, LU G J, et al. The historical change and future trend of American research and judgment on China’s scientific and technological innovation: analysis based on the annual report of USCC[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2020, 39(7): 29-35, 22.)
[50] 李品.开放科学环境下科技安全的情报保障研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(1): 37-44. (LI P. Research on intelligence guarantee to maintain scientific and technological security in open scientific environment[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(1): 37-44.)
[51] 黎昔柒,曾海燕,易显飞.总体国家安全观视域下现代生物技术风险及其治理[J].湖南社会科学, 2023(1): 112-119. (LI X Q, ZENG H Y, YI X F. Modern biotechnology risk and its management from the perspective of overall national security[J]. Social sciences in Hunan, 2023(1): 112-119.)
[52] 孙那,鲍一鸣.生成式人工智能的科技安全风险与防范[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 53(1): 108-121. (SUN N, BAO Y M. Technological security risk and prevention of generative artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(philosophy and social sciences edition), 2024, 53(1): 108-121.)
[53] 张家年,马费成.国家科技安全情报体系及建设[J].情报学报, 2016, 35(5): 483-491. (ZHANG J N, MA F C. On the system and construction of the national security intelligence of science and technology[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2016, 35(5): 483-491.)
[54] 陈仕平,孙君.军民融合深度发展背景下国防科技安全保障相关立法体系建设论析[J].法学杂志, 2017, 38(5): 19-27. (CHEN S P, SUN J. Discussion on the legislation system construction of national defense science and technology security guarantee under the background of greater civil-military integration[J]. Law science magazine, 2017, 38(5): 19-27.)
[55] 李品.开放科学环境下科技文献泄密风险防控探析[J].情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(6): 10-16. (LI P. Analysis on risk prevention and control of scientific and technical literature disclosure in the open science environment[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2023, 46(6): 10-16.)
[56] 张运良.科技情报工作中的文献资源风险问题研究[J].情报杂志, 2023, 42(12): 100-105. (ZHANG Y L. Research on risks related to literature resource in scientific and technological information work[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2023, 42(12): 100-105.)
[57] 潘亚玲,肖迅韬.美国技术民族主义的结构转型与美对华技术遏制[J].外交评论(外交学院学报), 2024, 41(6): 24-47, 166. (PAN Y L, XIAO X T. The structural transformation of America’s techno-nationalism and its technological containment of China[J]. Foreign affairs review, 2024, 41(6): 24-47, 166.)
[58] KIM M J, EOM D, LEE H. The geopolitics of next generation mobile communication standardization: the case of open RAN[J]. Telecommunications policy, 2023, 47(10): 102625.
[59] STARRS S K, GERMANN J. Responding to the China challenge in techno-nationalism: divergence between Germany and the United States[J]. Development and change, 2021, 52(5): 1122-1146.
[60] 刘国柱.特朗普政府技术民族主义论析[J].美国研究, 2020, 34(4): 45-67, 6. (LIU G Z. An analysis of American technological nationalism of the Trump administration[J]. The Chinese journal of American studies, 2020, 34(4): 45-67, 6.)
[61] 邹虹瑾.美国科技利益集团与政党关系演变及其影响[J].当代世界与社会主义, 2024(2): 105-114. (ZOU H J. The evolution and impact of the relationship between American technology interest groups and political parties[J]. Contemporary world and socialism, 2024(2): 105-114.)
[62] 余南平,冯峻锋.新技术革命背景下的欧洲战略重塑——基于技术主权视角的分析[J].欧洲研究, 2022, 40(5): 1-28, 157. (YU N P, FENG J F. The reshaping of Europe’s strategy in the context of new technological revolution: an analysis from the perspective of technological sovereignty[J]. Chinese journal of European studies, 2022, 40(5): 1-28, 157.)
[63] ROSSI M A. EU technology-specific industrial policy: the case of 5G and 6G[J]. Telecommunications policy, 2024, 48(2): 102639.
[64] 曹佳鲁,房乐宪.技术主权与地缘政治:解码《欧洲经济安全战略》的核心与影响[J].和平与发展, 2024(3): 80-105, 203-204. (CAO J L, FANG L X. Technological sovereignty and geopolitics: deciphering the core and implication of the European economic security strategy[J]. Peace and development, 2024(3): 80-105, 203-204.)
[65] 刘兰剑,朱亚玲.国家科技安全的风险评估、预警方法及其实证——以集成电路制造业为例[J].软科学, 2025, 39(3): 44-51. (LIU L J, ZHU Y L. National technology security risk assessment, early warning methods, and empirical study: a case study of the integrated circuit manufacturing industry[J]. China soft science, 2025, 39(3): 44-51.)
[66] 曹琨,吴新年,白光祖,等.“科学—技术”关联视角下新兴技术的科技安全风险早期识别研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2025, 48(6): 123-131. (CAO K, WU X N, BAI G Z, et al. Research on early identification of science and technology security risks in emerging technologies from the perspective of “science-technology” linkage[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2025, 48(6): 123-131.)
[67] 徐宗煌,蔡鸿宇,张伟,等.我国科技安全风险评估指标体系与模型构建研究[J].情报科学, 2023, 41(12): 165-173, 182. (XU Z H, CAI H Y, ZHANG W, et al. The construction of the index system and model for assessing the national science and technology security risk[J]. Information science, 2023, 41(12): 165-173, 182.)
[68] 西桂权,李辉,靳晓宏,等.基于模糊理论的中国科技安全风险评估分析[J].科技管理研究, 2025, 45(1): 83-91. (XI G Q, LI H, JIN X H, et al. Evaluation analysis of China’s science and technology security risk based on fuzzy theory[J]. Science and technology management research, 2025, 45(1): 83-91.)
[69] 王刚,陈伟,曹秋红.国防科技工业科技安全能力评价[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(5): 107-112. (WANG G, CHEN W, CAO Q H. Evaluation of national defense industry’s science and technology security capability[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(social sciences edition), 2020, 22(5): 107-112.)
[70] 徐晓慧,罗先觉.基于聚类分析的国家科技安全评估研究[J].科学学研究, 2025, 43(8): 1579-1587. (XU X H, LUO X J. Research on national science and technology security assessment based on cluster analysis[J]. Studies in science of science, 2025, 43(8): 1579-1587.)
[71] 孙德梅,吴丰,唐月,等.军民融合背景下国防科技工业科技安全评价研究——以电子工业为例[J].情报杂志, 2017, 36(11): 28-33. (SUN D M, WU F, TANG Y, et al. A study on safety evaluation of national defense industry under the background of civil-military integration: take the electronic industry as example[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2017, 36(11): 28-33.)
[72] 蔡劲松,谭爽,武佳奇.关键科技领域安全风险评估指标体系构建研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2022(3): 33-41. (CAI J S, TAN S, WU J Q. Research on construction of security risk indicator system in key science and technology area[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2022(3): 33-41.)
[73] 杨名刚.论国家科技安全诉求的现实困境与出路[J].学术交流, 2011(9): 95-98. (YANG M G. On the realistic difficulties and solutions of national science and technology security demands[J]. Academic exchange, 2011(9): 95-98.)
[74] 杨名刚.中国特色社会主义科技安全诉求的三重人化向度[J].求实, 2012(7): 33-35. (YANG M G. Triple humanization dimension of the demand for science and technology security in socialism with Chinese characteristics[J]. Truth seeking, 2012(7): 33-35.)
[75] 陈劲,朱子钦,季与点,等.底线式科技安全治理体系构建研究[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(8): 1345-1357. (CHEN J, ZHU Z Q, JI Y D, et al. Research on the construction of science and technology security governance system based on bottom line thinking[J]. Studies in science of science, 2020, 38(8): 1345-1357.)
[76] 赵世军,董晓辉,旷毓君.系统论视域下我国科技安全治理的机理和路径研究[J].系统科学学报, 2023, 31(4): 73-78. (ZHAO S J, DONG X H, KUANG Y J. Research on the mechanism and path of science and technology security governance from the perspective of system theory[J]. Chinese journal of systems science, 2023, 31(4): 73-78.)
[77] 周文康,费艳颖.美国科技安全创新政策的新动向——兼论中国科技自立自强战略的新机遇[J].科学学研究, 2023, 41(3): 454-463. (ZHOU W K, FEI Y Y. The new trend of American science and technology security innovation policy: also on the new opportunity of self-reliance and self-improvement in science and technology in China[J]. Studies in science of science, 2023, 41(3): 454-463.)
[78] 李英.国防科技安全的法律保障[J].江南社会学院学报, 2009, 11(3): 9-12. (LI Y. Legal protection of science and technology for national defense[J]. Journal of Jiangnan Social University, 2009, 11(3): 9-12.)
[79] 肖君拥,朱海峰.美国“芯片法案”的历史根源及效果预估[J].人民论坛, 2023(6): 79-84. (XIAO J Y, ZHU H F. The historical roots and effect estimation of the US CHIPS Act[J]. People’s tribune, 2023(6): 79-84.)
[80] 郭秋怡,游光荣.深刻认识科技安全与经济安全互动关系建立科技安全监测预警体系[J].中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(4): 553-561. (GUO Q Y, YOU G R. Understand interactive relationship between S&T security and economic security, establish S&T security monitoring and early warning system[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(4): 553-561.)
[81] 刘国柱.地缘政治视野下的新兴技术与美国技术民族主义[J].当代世界, 2020(10): 30-37. (LIU G Z. Emerging technology and American technological nationalism from perspective of geopolitics[J]. Contemporary world, 2020(10): 30-37.)
[82] 刘国柱.美国技术民族主义的历史源流与当代体现[J].人民论坛, 2023(8): 86-91. (LIU G Z. The historical origins and contemporary manifestations of American techno-nationalism[J]. People’s tribune, 2023(8): 86-91.)
[83] 张成新.战略自主、技术权力与欧盟数字战略的权力政治转向[J].世界经济与政治论坛, 2025(2): 68-87, 174. (ZHANG C X. Strategic autonomy, technological power and the power political shift in the EU digital strategy[J]. Forum of world economics & politics, 2025(2): 68-87, 174.)
[84] 郑春荣,金欣.欧盟数字主权建设的背景、路径与挑战[J].当代世界与社会主义, 2022(2): 151-159. (ZHENG C R, JIN X. The background, path and challenges of EU’s efforts in fostering digital sovereignty[J]. Contemporary world and socialism, 2022(2): 151-159.)
[85] 闫广,忻华.中美欧竞争背景下的欧盟“数字主权”战略研究[J].国际关系研究, 2023(3): 62-86, 157. (YAN G, XIN H. Studies on EU digital sovereignty strategy under the background of competition among China, America and Europe[J]. Journal of international relations, 2023(3): 62-86, 157.)
Outlines

/

〈 〉