INFORMATION RESEARCH

The Effects of Task Type and Learning Cognitive Strategies on Video-type Search Behavior in a Self-regulated Learning Context

  • Fang Zhou ,
  • Hong Caifei ,
  • Qin Shuyan ,
  • Liu Chang
Expand
  • Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received date: 2021-04-11

  Revised date: 2021-07-26

  Online published: 2021-11-19

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] In the Internet era, video platforms have become a new knowledge learning scenario. In this scenario, the search interaction process can be seen as a self-regulated learning process. This paper focuses on the effects of different task types and learning cognitive strategies on video-based search behavior in self-regulated learning contexts to complement research in the field of interactive information retrieval on video-based search behavior in learning contexts.[Method/process] In this paper, we chose two types of tasks:factual and skill-based. And cognitive strategies were classified into four types based on the self-regulated learning framework:rehearsal,elaboration,organization and critical thinking. The study adopted an experimental approach, using the Bilibili video site as a test system, and borrowed an existing measurement framework to explore the differences in behavioral characteristics and search effects of users with different learning cognitive strategies when performing different types of tasks based on experimental data.[Result/conclusion] This paper finds that different task types and learning cognitive strategies affect search behavior and learning effectiveness, showing significant differences in several indicators. The analysis and conclusion combined with task and cognitive strategy characteristics suggest improvements for the system use of video-based search platforms in learning contexts, which have positive implications for the improvement of such search platforms and the enhancement of user search experience and learning efficiency.

Cite this article

Fang Zhou , Hong Caifei , Qin Shuyan , Liu Chang . The Effects of Task Type and Learning Cognitive Strategies on Video-type Search Behavior in a Self-regulated Learning Context[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021 , 65(21) : 84 -96 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.21.016

References

[1] 中国网络视听节目服务协会.2020中国网络视听发展研究报告[R/OL].[2020-11-30].https://diba.ciavc.com/news/ndetails/id/160.html.
[2] 艾瑞咨询.2020年中国移动互联网内容生态洞察报告[R/OL].[2020-11-30].http://report.iresearch.cn/report_pdf.aspx?id=3593.
[3] ZIMMERMAN B J, MARTINEZ-PONS M. Development of a structured inter-view for assessing students' use of self-regulated learning strategies[J]. American educational research journal,1986,23(4):614-628.
[4] 路海东,张丽娜.自我调节学习的研究进展与趋势[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,61(6):84-90.
[5] RIEH S Y, GWIZDKA J, FREUND L, et a1. Searching as learning:novel measures for information interaction research[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science & Technology.2014, 51(1):1-4.
[6] ZIMMERMAN B J, SCHUNK D H. Self-regulated learning and performance:an introduction and an overview[A]. ZIMMERMAN B J, SCHUNK D H. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York:Routledge, 2011.
[7] PINTRICH P R, SMITH D A F, GARCIA T. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ)[J]. Educational and psychological measurement, 1993, 53(3):801-813.
[8] 袁红,李秋.搜索任务和搜索能力对用户探索式搜索行为的影响研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(15):94-105.
[9] 刘涵蕊,刘畅.认知风格与话题熟悉度对学习型任务下搜索交互行为的影响研究[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(4):56-62.
[10] 孙晓宁,姚青.信息搜索用户学习行为投入影响研究:基于认知风格与自我效能[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(10):99-107.
[11] 王洪江,黄洁,温慧群. 基于在线学习行为数据的学习者视频学习特点分析[C]//教育部高等学校教育技术专业教学指导委员会.走向智慧时代的教育创新发展研究——第16届教育技术国际论坛暨首届智慧教育国际研讨会论文集.徐州:教育信息化工程技术研究中心,2017:5.
[12] COLLINS-THOMPSON K, HANSEN P, HAUFF C.Search as learning(dagstuhl seminar 17092)[J].Dagstuhl reports, 2017,7(2):135-162.
[13] DODSON S, ROLL I, FONG M, et al. Active viewing:a study of video highlighting in the classroom[C]//Assoc comp machinery. Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval. New Brunswick:Association for Computing Machinery,2018:237-240.
[14] XIE X, MAO J, LIU Y, et al. Grid-based evaluation metrics for web image search[C]//Assoc Comp Machinery. The World Wide Web conference. San Francisco:Association for Computing Machinery,2019:2103-2114.
[15] 王志红,曹树金.视频检索相关性判断的影响因素:基于PLS路径分析的实证研究[J].情报学报,2020,39(9):926-937.
[16] ALBASSAM S, RUTHVEN I. Users' relevance criteria for video in leisure contexts[J]. Journal of documentation, 2017,74(1):62-79.
[17] ALBASSAM S, RUTHVEN I. Dynamic aspects of relevance:differences in users' relevance criteria between selecting and viewing videos during leisure searches[EB/OL].[2021-03-15].http://InformationR.net/ir/25-1/paper850.html.
[18] 赵梦菊. 任务类型、任务属性与网络用户图像搜索行为关系研究[D].天津:南开大学,2017.
[19] URGO K, ARGUELLO J, CAPRA R. The effects of learning objectives on searchers' perceptions and behaviors[C]//Assoc Comp Machinery. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval. New York:Association for Computing Machinery,2020:77-84.
[20] GHOSH S, RATH M, SHAH C. Searching as learning:exploring search behavior and learning outcomes in learning-related tasks[C]//Assoc Comp Machinery. Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction & retrieval. New Brunswick:Association for Computing Machinery,2018:22-31.
[21] KLEIN G S. Perception:An approach to personality[M].New York:The Ronald Press Company, 1951.
[22] RIDING R, CHEEMA I. Cognitive styles-an overview and integration[J]. Educational psychology, 1991, 11(3):193-215.
[23] 宪瑞.9亿中国人爱看视频B站CEO陈睿:未来会做视频就像以前会写作文一样[EB/OL].[2020-10-13].https://news.mydrivers.com/1/717/717869.htm.
[24] HAWKING D, CRASWELL N, BAILEY P, et al. Measuring search engine quality[J]. Information retrieval, 2001,4(1):33-59.
[25] CAN F, NURAY R, SEVDIK A B. Automatic performance evaluation of Web search engines[J]. Information processing & management, 2004, 40(3):495-514.
[26] TONG F, GUO H, WANG Z, et al. Examining cross-cultural transferability of self-regulated learning model:an adaptation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire for Chinese adult learners[J]. Educational studies, 2020,46(4):422-439.
[27] MAZUMDER Q H. Student motivation and learning strategies of students from USA, China and Bangladesh[J]. International journal of evaluation & research in education, 2014, 3(4):205-210.
[28] KRATHWOHL D. A revision of bloom's taxonomy:an overview[J]. Theory into practice, 2002, 41(4):212.
[29] 袁红,施晓玲.搜索与学习:探索式搜索中的个体学习行为研究[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(3):36-42.
[30] 刘畅,宋筱璇,杨子傲.用户信息搜索中的学习行为及过程探究[J].大学图书馆学报,2019,37(4):36-45.
[31] BROOKE J. Usability evaluation in industry[M]. London:Taylor & Francis, 1996.
[32] HACKMAN J R. Work redesign and motivation[J]. Professional psychology:research and practice, 1980, 11(3):445-455.
[33] FOSCHI M. Gender, performance level, and competence standards in task groups[J]. Social science research, 2009, 38(2):447-457.
[34] KRIKSCIUNIENE D, STRIGUNAITE S. Virtual team tasks performance evaluation based on multi-level fuzzy comprehensive method[C]//IARIA. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on future computational technologies and applications.Rome:Future Computing,2011:20-25.
Outlines

/