[Purpose/Significance] From the perspective of knowledge organization, this study explores the influence of two different organization forms on the reading effect of learning materials, and provides references for the research and application of knowledge representation in subsequent reading materials. [Method/Process] Using a between-group experiment design, 26 subjects participated two types of reading tests, a reading search task and a memory task, respectively. The differences were compared by reading time, the number of correct questions and subjective preference of subjects. [Result/Conclusion] The results show that there is no significant difference in the performance of the subjects in the search task, but in the memory task, the reading effect of tree-structure organization form is significantly better than traditional linear paragraphs. In addition, the merits of the tree-structured materials in the evaluation of subjects’ subjective preferences are more, such as clear logic, easy to remember, and so on.
[1] BLOM H, SEGERS E, KNOORS H, et al. Comprehension and navigation of networked hypertexts[J]. Journal of computer assisted learning, 2018, 34(3):306-314.
[2] STUDER R, BENJAMINS V R, FENSEL D. Knowledge engineering:principles and methods[J]. Data&knowledge engineering, 1998, 25(1/2):161-197.
[3] FIKES R. The role of frame-based representation in reasoning[J]. Cacm, 1985, 28(9):904-920.
[4] O'DONNELL A M, DANSEREAU D F, HALL R H. Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing[J]. Educational psychology review, 2002, 14(1):71-86.
[5] 吕胤宣.电子书版式设计对受众阅读心理影响的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳师范大学, 2014.
[6] BERNARD M L, CHAPARRO B S, MILLS M M, et al. Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readability of computer-displayed times new roman and arial text[J]. International journal of human-computer studies, 2003, 59(6):823-835.
[7] 宫殿坤,郝春东,王殿春.字体特征与搜索方式对视觉搜索反应时的影响[J].心理科学, 2009(5):1142-1145.
[8] 朱海. VDT文本阅读工效及其影响因素[J].人类工效学, 1996(2):53-56.
[9] KOLERS P A, DUCHNICKY R L, FERGUSON D C. Eye movement measurement of readability of CRT displays[J]. Human factors the journal of the human factors&ergonomics society, 1981, 23(5):517-527.
[10] HWANG S L, WANG M Y, HER C C. An experimental study of Chinese information displays on VDTs[J]. Human factors, 1988, 30(4):461-471.
[11] TULLIS T S. The formatting of numeric displays:a review and analysis[J]. Human factors, 1983, 25(6):657-682.
[12] SUTHERS D D. Effects of alternate representations of evidential relations on collaborative learning discourse[C]//Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning 1999 Conference. Palo Alto, CA:International Society of the Learning Sciences, 1999:611-621.
[13] SUTHERS D D. Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse[J]. Journal of universal computer science, 2001, 7(7):254-277.
[14] KOMISCHKE T. Text treatment and the user interface[EB/OL].[2021-12-01].https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/01/text-treatment-and-the-user-interface.php.
[15] KRUG S.点石成金:访客至上的Web和移动可用性设计秘笈[M].蒋芳,译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2015.
[16] 杜建华.电子书信息组织模式研究[D].北京:北京印刷学院, 2014.
[17] CHAKRABARTI S. Mining the Web:discovering knowledge from hypertext data[M]. San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
[18] KHALIFA M, LAM R. Web-based learning:effects on learning process and outcome[J]. IEEE transactions on education, 2002, 45(4):350-356.
[19] KLOIS S S, SEGERS E, VERHOEVEN L. How hypertext fosters children's knowledge acquisition:the roles of text structure and graphical overview[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2013, 29(5):2047-2057.
[20] 张智君,江程铭,任衍具,等.信息呈现方式、时间压力和认知风格对网上学习的影响[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2004(2):228-231.
[21] NIEDERHAUSER D S, REYNOLDS R E, SALMEN D J, et al. The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 2000, 23(3):237-255.
[22] 张智君.超文本阅读中的迷路问题及其心理学研究[J].心理科学进展, 2001, 9(2):102-106.
[23] 张智君,沈昉,朱伟,等.文本组织和结构化水平对中文信息搜索的影响[J].心理科学, 2005, 28(2):368-370.
[24] DESTEFANO D, LEFEVRE J A. Cognitive load in hypertext reading:a review[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2007, 23(3):1616-1641.
[25] 谢继红,刘华山,吴鹏.超文本与线性文本中元理解判断的比较[J].心理学探新, 2018, 38(1):49-54.
[26] WALHOUT J, BRAND-GRUWEL S, JARODZKA H, et al. Learning and navigating in hypertext:navigational support by hierarchical menu or tag cloud?[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2015, 46(2015):218-227.
[27] MANGEN A, OLIVIER G, VELAY J-L. Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on Kindle:where in the text and when in the story?[J/OL]. Frontiers in psychology, 2019, 10(38):1-11.[2021-11-21]. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02014788/document.
[28] COIRO J. Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy[J]. Reading research quarterly, 2021, 56(1):9-31.
[29] 张智君,韩淼,朱祖祥,等.文本结构和时间应激对网页阅读绩效的影响[J].心理科学, 2002, 25(4):422-424.
[30] 孙悦亮,肖崇好.限定阅读时间条件下文本呈现方式对阅读效果的影响[J].心理与行为研究, 2006(4):297-300.
[31] SABATINI J, WANG Z, O'REILLY T. Relating reading comprehension to oral reading performance in the NAEP fourth-grade special study of oral reading[J]. Reading research quarterly, 2019, 54(2):253-271.
[32] 陈康. PISA阅读素养测评内容领域的解析及其启示[J].中国考试, 2014(10):56-60.
[33] MCDONALD S, STEVENSON R J. Disorientation in hypertext:the effects of three text structures on navigation performance[J]. Applied ergonomics, 1996, 27(1):61-68.
[34] AMADIEU F, TRICOT A, MARINE C. Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation[J]. Interacting with computers, 2010, 22(2):88-97.
[35] CHANG K E, SUNG Y T, CHIOU S K. Use of hierarchical hyper concept map in Web-based courses[J]. Journal of educational computing research, 2002, 27(4):335-353.
