Library and Information Service

Library and Information Service >

2022 , Vol. 66 >Issue 8: 42 - 54

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.08.005

SPECICAL TOPIC: Empower Information Users to Improve Learning Performance

Relationships Between Note-Taking Behavior and Learning Outcome in Learning-Related Search

  • Meng Gaohui ,
  • Song Xiaoxuan ,
  • Zhang Xiaoyue ,
  • Liu Chang
Expand
  • 1. Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
    2. College of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095

Received date: 2021-10-20

  Revised date: 2021-12-22

  Online published: 2022-04-24

Fold

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Information search is not only a process of information acquisition, but also a process of users’ self-learning. In the context of learning-related search, this paper explores the influence of the note-taking behavior on learning outcome in the process of searching, the characteristics of users’ note-taking behavior and the influence of the search context on note-taking behavior. [Method/Process] This paper collected data by the experiment method, analyzed the characteristics of note-taking by coding analysis, descriptive statistics and cluster analysis, and analyzed the association of note-taking with search context and learning outcome by difference test. [Result/Conclusion] This paper found three types of note-taking patterns: "rough collection-linear structure", "fine collection-linear structure" and "free structure". Users with more prior knowledge tend to adopt the pattern of "rough collection, linear structure", which may lead to poorer learning efficiency. The results are helpful to enrich the limited exploration of information use behavior in relevant researches on "search as learning" and inspire various information search systems to design and optimize functions from the perspective of supporting users' self-learning.

Key words： note-taking; learning-related search; search as learning; learning outcome; knowledge level

Cite this article

Meng Gaohui , Song Xiaoxuan , Zhang Xiaoyue , Liu Chang . Relationships Between Note-Taking Behavior and Learning Outcome in Learning-Related Search[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022 , 66(8) : 42 -54 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.08.005

References

[1] MEYER A, HANSEN P, FOURIE I. Assessing the potential of third space to design a creative virtual academic space based on findings from information behavior[J]. Information research, 2018, 23(2):paper isic1814. http://www.informationr.net/ir/23-4/isic2018/isic1814.html.
[2] VAKKARI P. Task-based information searching[J]. Annual review of information science&technology, 2003, 37(1):413-464.
[3] 宋筱璇,刘畅,陈建龙.搜索即学习主题的相关研究综述[J].图书情报工作, 2021, 65(10):113-126.
[4] 胡进.论课堂记笔记策略的创新性[J].上海教育科研, 2000(3):58-59.
[5] SMITH C L, RIEH S Y. Knowledge-context in search systems:toward information-literate actions[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2019:55-62.
[6] RIEH S Y, GWIZDKA J, FREUND L, et al. Searching as learning:novel measures for information interaction research[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 51(1):1-4.
[7] HANSEN P, RIEH S Y. Recent advances on searching as learning:an introduction to the special issue[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1):3-6.
[8] 谭金波.学生信息搜索的内隐与外显策略对网络学习绩效的影响[J].中国电化教育, 2014(9):67-71, 77.
[9] GWIZDKA J, CHEN X. Towards observable indicators of learning on search[C/OL]//Proceedings of SIGIR 2016 workshop:searching as learning (SAL), 2016[2022-01-30]. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1647/SAL2016_paper_19.pdf.
[10] BHATTACHARYA N, GWIZDKA J. Relating eye-tracking measures with changes in knowledge on search tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 ACM symposium on eye tracking research&applications. New York:ACM, 2018:1-5.
[11] COLLINS-THOMPSON K, RIEH S Y, HAYNES C C, et al. Assessing learning outcomes in web search:a comparison of tasks and query strategies[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2016:163-172.
[12] GADIRAJU U, YU R, DIETZE S, et al. Analyzing knowledge gain of users in informational search sessions on the web[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 conference on human information interaction&retrieval. New York:ACM, 2018:2-11.
[13] PIOLAT A, OLIVER T, KELLOG R T. Cognitive effort during note-taking[J]. Applied cognitive psychology, 2005, 19(3):291-312.
[14] 樊素芳,樊琪,陈洁.大学生课堂笔记策略现状研究[J].心理与行为研究, 2007, 5(1):70-74.
[15] CASTELLÓ M, MONEREO C. Students'note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool[J]. Educational studies in language and literature, 2005, 5(3):265-285.
[16] HAGHVERDI·H, BIRIA R, KARIMI L. Note-taking strategies and academic achievement[J]. Journal of language and linguistic studies, 2010, 6(1):75-109.
[17] KIEWRA K A. A review of note-taking:the encoding-storage paradigm and beyond[J]. Educational psychology review, 1989, 1(2):147-172.
[18] KOBAYASHI K. What limits the encoding effect of note-taking?A meta-analytic examination[J]. Contemporary educational psychology, 2005, 30(2):242-262.
[19] KIEWRA K A, DUBOIS N F, CHRISTIAN D, et al. Note-taking functions and techniques[J]. Journal of educational psychology, 1991, 83(2):240-245.
[20] KIEWRA K A, BENTON S L. Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance[J]. Contemporary educational psychology, 1995, 20(2):172-187.
[21] 胡进.大学生记笔记策略的实验研究[J].心理科学, 1999, 22(4):377-378.
[22] POTTHAST M, HAGEN M, VÖLSKE M, et al. Crowdsourcing interaction logs to understand text reuse from the web[C]//Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. Pennsylvania:The Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013:1212-1221.
[23] HAGEN M, POTTHAST M, GOMOLL J, et al. How writers search:analyzing the search and writing logs of non-fictional essays[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2016:193-202.
[24] WILEY J, VOSS J. The effects of "playing" historian on learning in history[J]. Applied cognitive psychology, 1996, 10(7):63-72.
[25] WILEY J, VOSS J F. Constructing arguments from multiple sources:tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text[J]. Journal of educational psychology, 1999, 91(2):301-311.
[26] VOSS J F, WILEY J. Developing understanding while writing essays in history[J]. International journal of educational research, 1997, 27(3):255-265.
[27] HAGENÅ M, BRAASCH J L, BRÅTEN I. Relationships between spontaneous note-taking, self-reported strategies and comprehension when reading multiple texts in different task conditions[J]. Journal of research in reading, 2014, 37(S1):S141-S157.
[28] CAPRA R, MARCHIONINI G, VELASCO-MARTIN J, et al. Tools-at-hand and learning in multi-session, collaborative search[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York:ACM, 2010:951-960.
[29] SONG X, LIU C, LIU H. Characterizing and exploring users'task completion process at different stages in learning related tasks[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 55(1):460-469.
[30] WU J Y, XIE C. Using time pressure and note-taking to prevent digital distraction behavior and enhance online search performance:perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2018, 88:244-254.
[31] WU J Y. The predictive validities of individual working-memory capacity profiles and note-taking strategies on online search performance[J]. Journal of computer assisted learning, 2020, 36(6):876-889.
[32] 刘畅,宋筱璇,杨子傲.用户信息搜索中的学习行为及过程探究[J].大学图书馆学报, 2019, 37(4):36-45.
[33] ROY N, TORRE M V, GADIRAJU U, et al. Note the highlight:incorporating active reading tools in a search as learning environment[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 conference on human information interaction and retrieval. New York:ACM, 2021:229-238.
[34] 宋筱璇,刘畅.搜索前后用户知识水平的评估及其变化情况分析[J].图书情报工作, 2018, 62(2):108-116.
[35] PETERSON E R,DEARY I J,AUSTIN E J. Are intelligence and personality related to verbal-imagery and wholistic-analytic cognitive styles?[J]. Personality&individual differences, 2005, 39(1):201-213.
[36] 宋筱璇,刘畅.学习型搜索中用户信息源选择和使用策略研究[J].情报学报, 2019, 38(6):655-666.
[37] RIEH S Y, COLLINS-THOMPSON K, HANSEN P, et al. Towards searching as a learning process:a review of current perspectives and future directions[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(1):19-34.
[38] RIDING R, CHEEMA I. Cognitive Styles-an overview and integration[J]. Educational psychology:an international journal of experimental educational psychology, 1991, 11(3/4):193-215.
[39] 刘涵蕊,刘畅.认知风格与话题熟悉度对学习型任务下搜索交互行为的影响研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(4):56-62.
[40] MUELLER P A, OPPENHEIMER D M. The pen is mightier than the keyboard:advantages of longhand over laptop note taking[J]. Psychological science, 2014, 25(6):1159-1168.
[41] CRAIK F I, LOCKHART R S. Levels of processing:a framework for memory research[J]. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 1972, 11(6):671-684.
[42] KIEWRA K A. Investigating notetaking and review:a depth of processing alternative[J]. Educational psychologist, 1985, 20(1):23-32.
[43] 成波,黄晓斌.国内外网络内容分析应用现状研究[J].图书情报工作, 2007(9):45-50.
[44] 孙晓军,周宗奎.探索性因子分析及其在应用中存在的主要问题[J].心理科学, 2005, 28(6):1440-1442.
[45] 李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计, 2008, 25(5):541-544.
[46] CRESCENZI A, LI Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Towards better support for exploratory search through an investigation of notes-to-self and notes-to-share[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York:ACM, 2019:1093-1096.
[47] PEPPER R J, MAYER R E. Note taking as a generatie activity[J]. Journal of educational psychology, 1978, 78(4):514-522.
[48] FISHER M, GODDU M K, KEIL F C. Searching for explanations:how the internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge[J]. Journal of experimental psychology:general, 2015, 144(3):674-687.作者贡献说明:孟高慧:文献综述、数据的收集、分析和论文初稿的撰写;宋筱璇:数据收集、论文修改;张潇月:参与数据分析;刘畅:研究设计指导、论文修改和定稿。
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

    Copyrights © LIS Press Co., Ltd. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.