[Purpose/Significance] New liberal arts construction has put forward higher requirements for cross-integration and systematic collaboration of the courses in the curriculum group of the information resource management discipline. The traditional curriculum group construction methods cannot satisfy these requirements. This paper aims to propose a new curriculum construction method, namely "Curriculum Cube", which is based on the first-hand undergraduate teaching experience from the School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China (RUC), to serve as a basis for building a new type of curriculum group of the information resource management discipline. [Method/Process] Firstly, this paper disclosed the intrinsic mechanism for the traditional curriculum groups failing to support the curriculum construction of interdisciplinary information resource management for new liberal arts. Secondly, the paper clarified the core idea of the "Curriculum Cube" construction according to the discovered core common problems. Thirdly, it proposed the design methods of the "Curriculum Cube". Fourthly, it demonstrated the implementation methods and effect of the proposed method based on teaching practice. Finally, it presented the support system required for the "Curriculum Cube" construction. [Result/Conclusion] Firstly, two traditional models for curriculum group construction in the forms of "one-dimensional course chains" and "two-dimensional course sets" are summarized. The common problems are that the courses are organized unsystematically and inconsistently. Secondly, the functional positioning of the "Curriculum Cube" is clarified as the basic component for the new curriculum group, and the teaching objectives are knowledge linking and ability integration. Thirdly, the design method of "Curriculum Cube" is composed of hierarchy design, course coupling method, and course collaboration mechanism. In addition, the operability and practice effect of the proposed method were verified through the practical example of "one line, three tiers and four courses" of RUC. Finally, the support system of "Curriculum Cube" is elaborated. In summary, the results of this study will serve as a scientific reference and strong support for the construction and practice of the new curriculum groups for interdisciplines represented by the information resource management, in the context of new liberal arts.
Fu Yu
,
Lu Xiaobin
,
Niu Li
,
Liu Lichao
. Research on the Design of "Curriculum Cube" in the Interdisciplinary Information Resource Management in the Context of New Liberal Arts：A Case Study of Renmin University of China[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022
, 66(11)
: 76
-86
.
DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.11.009
[1] 新华网.教育部启动实施"六卓越一拔尖"计划2.0[EB/OL]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2019-04/29/c_1210122557.htm.
[2] 马费成,李志元.新文科背景下我国图书情报学科的发展前景[J].中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(6):4-15.
[3] 孙建军,裴雷,柯青,等.新文科背景下"信息资源管理"课程教学创新思考[J].图书与情报, 2020(6):19-25.
[4] 赵星,乔利利,杨洁.我国高教变革对信息资源管理学科群的影响[J].图书与情报, 2019(6):18-24.
[5] 朝乐门.信息资源管理理论的继承与创新:大数据与数据科学视角[J].中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(2):26-42.
[6] 柯平.新图情档——新文科建设中的图书情报与档案管理一级学科发展[J].情报资料工作, 2021, 42(1):15-20.
[7] 赖茂生.信息管理学科发展如何破解瓶颈悖论?[J].大学图书情报学刊, 2019, 37(5):3-7.
[8] 肖明.信息资源管理:理论与实践[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2014.
[9] 陶然.一流大学文学经典课程群的建设与思考[J].中国大学教学, 2020(8):43-47.
[10] 黎海波,谢健民.信管专业在新文科背景下的数据科学课程群建设研究[J].情报科学, 2020, 38(8):128-133.
[11] SONG I, ZHU Y. Big data and data science:what should we teach?[J]. Expert systems, 2016, 33(4):364-373.
[12] 朝乐门,杨灿军,王盛杰,等.全球数据科学课程建设现状的实证分析[J].数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(6):12-21.
[13] ORTIZ-REPISO V, GREENBERG J, CALZADA-PRADO J. A cross-institutional analysis of data-related curricula in information science programmes:a focused look at the iSchools[J]. Journal of information science, 2018, 44(6):768-784.
[14] 周林兴,周丽,艾文华.大数据背景下图情档专业研究生数据素养教育探析[J].图书情报工作, 2019, 63(19):57-65.
[15] 周耀林,黄川川.大数据时代信息管理学科人才培养模式改革研究[J].中国高教研究, 2017(10):107-110.
[16] SONG I, ZHU Y. Big data and data science:opportunities and challenges of iSchools[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2017, 2(3):1-18.
[17] 杨瑞仙,万佳琦. UIUC iSchool数据科学课程群调查研究[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(16):122-131.
[18] 李晶,张帅,王文韬.图书情报学院开展健康信息学教育的课程体系研究[J].图书馆学研究, 2018(10):2-8.
[19] 沈玖玖,徐萍,张琴,等.大数据时代高校数据素养课程群构建研究[J].图书情报工作, 2019, 63(19):66-74.
[20] 吕立杰.大概念课程设计的内涵与实施[J].教育研究, 2020, 41(10):53-61.
[21] MMANTSETSA M. Reconceptualizing and repositioning curriculum in the 21st century[R].Paris:UNESCO, 2018.
[22] 赵炬明.什么是好的课程设计[J].高等教育研究, 2020, 41(9):84-87.
[23] 唐景莉.坚持"以本为本"推进"四个回归"——新时代全国高等学校本科教育工作会议述评[J].中国高等教育, 2018(Z2):11-12.
[24] ALMGERBI M, De MAURO A, KAHLAWI A, et al. A systematic review of data analytics job requirements and online-courses[J]. Journal of computer information systems, 2022,62(2):1-13.
[25] 巴尼特.高等教育理念[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2012.
[26] 艾里克森.以概念为本的课程与教学:培养核心素养的绝佳实践[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2018.
[27] 周毅.新文科背景下图情档学科"微专业"建设实践探讨[J].情报资料工作, 2021, 42(6):5-12.
[28] 曹文振,周庆山.美国顶尖iSchool信息科学专业本科教育的演变与启示——对课程设置10年后的再调查[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(1):70-79.
[29] OECD. The future of education and skills:education 2030[EB/OL]. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030% 20Positio n% 20Paper% 20(05.04.2018).pdf.
[30] 朱德全,吕鹏.大学教学的技术理性及其超越[J].教育研究, 2018, 39(8):73-80.
[31] 奥苏贝尔.意义学习新论——获得与保持知识的认知观[M].杭州:浙江教育出版, 2018.
[32] 安德森.学习、教学和评估的分类学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社, 2008.
[33] 王云,李志霞,白清玉,等.混合式教学中促进深度学习的同伴反馈研究[J].现代教育技术, 2021, 31(5):67-74.作者贡献说明:傅予:研究方案设计,总体架构设计,文献调研,论文撰写,论文修改;卢小宾:研究选题,研究思路与框架设计,论文修改;牛力:核心理念设计,教学方法设计;刘力超:文献调研,支撑体系设计。
