[1] 艾凉琼. 科学学派对科学发展的推动作用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2008, 181(3):249-250, 254. (AI L Q. The role of science school in promoting the development of science[J]. Science and technology management research, 2008, 181(3):249-250, 254.)
[2] 夏青. 科学学派的成长机制与发展策略研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2007. (XIA Q. Study on development mechanism and expansionist policy of scientific school[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2007.)
[3] 艾凉琼. 论科学学派的自组织性[J]. 科技管理研究, 2009, 29(9):456-457. (AI L Q. On the self-organization of the scientific school of thought[J]. Science and technology management research, 2009, 29(9):456-457.)
[4] 吴肃然, 李名荟. 扎根理论的历史与逻辑[J]. 社会学研究, 2020, 35(2):75-98, 243. (WU S R, LI M H. Grounded theory:history and logic[J]. Sociological studies, 2020, 35(2):75-98, 243.)
[5] 贾旭东, 衡量. 扎根理论的"丛林"、过往与进路[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(5):151-163. (JIA X D, HENG L. The "jungle", history, and approach road of the grounded theory[J]. Science research management, 2020, 41(5):151-163.)
[6] TITSCHER S, JENNER B. Methods of text and discourse analysis:in search of meaning[M]. London:Sage, 2000.
[7] STERN P N, PORR C J. Essentials of accessible grounded theory[M]. New York:Routledge, 2017.
[8] 舒非, 邱均平. 我国国际论文的真实影响力分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2022, 48(1):94-106. (SHU F, QIU J P. The true impact of China's international publications[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2022, 48(1):94-106.)
[9] SMALL H G. Cited documents as concept symbols[J]. Social studies of science, 1978, 8(3):327-340.
[10] 胡志刚. 推荐系统视角下的科技成果评价的再认识[J/OL]. 科学学与科学技术管理:1-23[2023-05-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1117.G3.20230308.1209.002.html. (HU Z G. Reunderstanding of the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements from the perspective of recommendation system[J/OL]. Science of science and management of s.& t:1-23[2023-05-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1117.G3.20230308.1209.002.html.)
[11] GARFIELD E. To cite or not to cite:a note of annoyance[J]. Current contents, 1977, 3(35):215-228.
[12] MERTON R K. The Matthew Effect in science II:cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property[J]. ISIS, 1988, 79(4):606-623.
[13] 韩佳燕, 赵勇. 引用关系中的诺贝尔奖效应研究——以2009-2016年 21位诺贝尔化学奖得主为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(7):174-181, 200. (HAN J Y, ZHAO Y. Research on the Nobel Prize effect in citation relation:a case study of chemistry laureates from 2009 to 2016[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2021, 40(7):174-181, 200.)
[14] CRONIN B, SHAW D. Identity-creators and imagemakers:using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 54(1):31-49.
[15] 李燕萍. 引用认同和引证图像研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2010, 33(10):4-7. (LI Y P. Research on Citation identity and citation image[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2010, 33(10):4-7.)
[16] 宿瑞芳, 郑德俊. 作者引用认同实证——以国内图书情报学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(22):51-56. (SU R F, ZHENG D J. Empirical analysis on authors' citation identity:taking domestic LIS as examples[J]. Library and information service, 2010, 54(22):51-56.)
[17] 贡金涛, 陈利东. 基于图书引用的作者引用认同和作者引用形象研究[J]. 现代情报, 2016, 36(4):20-25. (GONG J T, CHEN L D. Author citation identity and author citation image analysis based on book citation[J]. Journal of modern information, 2016, 36(4):20-25.)
[18] 王丽, 袁军鹏, 王娜等. 学术期刊的引用认同分析——以Scientometrics为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2011, 30(2):18-22. (WANG L, YUAN J P, WANG N et al. Citation identity of academic periodicals based on the analysis on Scientometrics[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2011, 30(2):18-22.)
[19] 苏芳荔, 孙建军. 期刊引用认同指标在期刊评价中的适用性分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(1):96-104. (SU F L, SUN J J. On the applicability of journal citation identity indicators in the evaluation of journal impact[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2012, 38(1):96-104.)
[20] 鲁晶晶, 邓勇, 陈云伟. 引用认同用于科研机构分析的探讨[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(6):53-56. (LU J J, DENG Y, CHEN Y W. Discussion of research institution analysis based on citation identity[J]. Library and information service, 2011, 55(6):53-56.)
[21] 周春雷, 李冰莹. 基于引荐分析的国内引用认同领域分析[J]. 数字 图书 馆论 坛, 2015(1):26-29. (ZHOU C L, LI B Y. The scene of citation identity study in China:based on citation recommendation analysis[J]. Digital library forum, 2015(1):26- 29.)
[22] 贡金涛, 陈利东, 贾征. 基于引用认同与引用形象的专利权人竞争情报分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014, 37(10):65- 71. (GONG J T, CHEN L D, JIA Z. Analysis of competitive intelligence for patent assignee based on citation identity and citation image[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2014, 37(10):65-71.)
[23] 刘志伟, 吕斌. 引用认同视角下信息计量跨学科研究的现况、评价与发展策略——以Web of Science数据为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2021, 40(9):97-111, 121. (LIU Z W, LÜ B. The present situation, evaluation and development strategy of interdisciplinary research in informetrics from the perspective of citation identity:based on Web of Science[J]. Library journal, 2021, 40(9):97-111, 121.)
[24] 刘劲 宇. 论哲 学的 派别 冲突 与学 派[D]. 长春:吉林 大学, 2019. (LIU J Y. On the factional clashes and schools of philosophy[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2019.)
[25] 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典[M]. 北京:商务印书馆, 2012. (Dictionary Editorial Office, Institute of Language, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Modern Chinese dictionary[M]. Beijing:Commercial Press, 2012.)
[26] 孙福胜. 论中国马克思主义哲学学派的背景、维度与建设[J]. 学术探索, 2021(5):36-43. (SUN F S. On the background, dimension and enlightenment of the schools of Marxist philosophy[J]. Academic exploration, 2021(5):36-43.)
[27] 史庆伟, 乔晓东, 徐硕, 等. 作者主题演化模型及其在研究兴趣演化分析中的应用[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(9):912-919. (SHI Q W, QIAO X D, XU S, et al. Author-topic evolution model and its application in analysis of research interests evolution[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2013, 32(9):912-919.)
[28] BARABÂSI A L, JEONG H, NÉDA Z, et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations[J]. Physica a:statistical mechanics and its applications, 2002, 311(3/4):590-614.
[29] 王福生, 杨洪勇. 作者科研合作网络模型与实证研究[J]. 图书 情报 工作, 2007, 51(10):68-71. (WANG F S, YANG H Y. Author collaboration network model and demonstration study[J]. Library and information service, 2007, 51(10):68-71.)
[30] 罗双玲, 张文琪, 夏昊翔. 基于半积累引文网络社区发现的学科领域主题演化分析——以" 合作演化" 领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(1):100-110. (LUO S L, ZHANG W Q, XIA H X. Exploring the evolution of research topics by community detection in partial-cumulative citation network:case of the "evolution of cooperation" field[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2017, 36(1):100-110.)
[31] 苗蕊, 刘鲁. 科学家合作网络中的社区发现[J]. 情报学报, 2011, 30(12):1312-1318. (MIAO R, LIU L. Community discovery in scientists' collaborative networks[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2011, 30(12):1312-1318.)
[32] 刘璐, 蔡永明. 基于语义加权的引文网络社区划分研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2021(1):50-56. (LIU L, CAI Y M. Research on the classification of citation network based on semantic weighting[J]. New century library, 2021(1):50-56.)
[33] 丁敬达, 郭杰. 融合内容相似度和路径相似性的潜在作者合作关系挖掘[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(1):124-128, 123. (DING J D, GUO J. Mining potential author cooperative relationships based on the similarity of content and path[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2021, 44(1):124-128, 123.)
[34] 许鑫, 李美玉, 陈红伶, 等. 基于作者-主题二分网络的学术共同体发现研究——以图书情报领域为例[J]. 情报理 论与 实践, 2022, 45(11):163-169, 204. (XU X, LI M Y, CHEN H L et al. Research on community discovery of academic community based on author-topic bipartite network:take library and information science for example[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2022, 45(11):163-169, 204.)
[35] 周荣. "中国学派"动画电影盛衰原因分析[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2019. (ZHOU R. An Analysis of the reasons for the boom and bust of "Chinese school" animation films[D]. Nanjing:Southeast University, 2019.)
[36] 余华, 姚占雷, 许鑫. 民国学人专题数据库构建及其学术特征分析——学术共同体视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(7):38-49. (YU H, YAO Z L, XU X. The construction of the thematic database of scholars in the Republic of China and the analysis of scholars' academic characteristics:from the perspective of academic community[J]. Library and information service, 2021, 65(7):38-49.)
[37] MORRELL J B. The chemist breeders:the research schools of Liebig and Thomas Thomson[J]. Ambix, 1972, 19(1):1-46.
[38] RICHARDSON A, UEBE T. The Cambridge companion to logical empiricism[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[39] WAHL-JORGENSEN K. The Chicago School of Sociology and Mass Communication research[M/OL]. The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems027.
[40] 李长玲, 刘运梅, 牌艳欣. 基于p指数的学术团体识别与评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(9):63-68. (LI C L, LIU Y M, PAI Y X. Recognition and evaluation of academic group based on p-index[J]. Information studies:theory & application, 2018, 41(9):63-68.)
[41] 晏晓菁. 基于社会网络的学术团体识别及其学术影响力研究[D]. 苏州:苏州大学, 2018. (YAN X J. Recognition of research groups and their effects based on social network analysis[D]. Suzhou:Soochow University, 2018.)
[42] WANG K, SHEN Z, HUANG C, et al. A review of Microsoft academic services for science of science studies[J/OL]. Frontiers in big data, 2019, 2:45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00045.
[43] LO K, WANG L L, NEUMANN M, et al. S2ORC:the semantic scholar open research corpus[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02782, 2019.
[44] 欧石燕, 凌洪飞. 引用文本自动分类及其应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16):125-136. (OU S Y, LING H F. A study of automatic classification of citation texts and its application[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(16):125-136.)
[45] 章成志, 李卓, 赵梦圆, 等. 基于引文内容的中文图书被引行为研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(3):96-109. (ZHANG C Z, LI Z, ZHAO M Y, et al. Citing behavior of Chinese books based on citation content[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(3):96-109.)
[46] XU L, DING K, LIN Y. Do negative citations reduce the impact of cited papers?[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(2):1161-1186.
[47] ALJABER B, STOKES N, BAILEY J, et al. Document clustering of scientific texts using citation contexts[J]. Information retrieval, 2010, 13(2):101-131.
[48] 李醒民. 科学方法概览[J]. 哲学动态, 2008(9):8-15. (LI X M. Overview of scientific methods[J]. Philosophical Trends, 2008(9):8-15.)
[49] 孟璇, 熊回香, 叶佳鑫. 共词网络视角下的图书情报学术论文研究方法演化[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2022, 42(6):77-88. (MENG X, XIONG H X, YE J X. Analysis on the evolution of research methods of academic papers in library and information science:a perspective of co-word network[J]. Library tribune, 2022, 42(6):77-88.)
[50] 王海宁. 心理学理论建构的新方法——扎根理论[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2008. (WANG H N. A new research method for construction of psychology theory:grounded theory[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2008.)
[51] GROOTENDORST M. BERTopic:neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794, 2022.
[52] ABUZAYED A, ALKHALIFA H. BERT for Arabic topic modeling an experimental study on BERTopic techniquel[J]. Procedia computer science, 2021, 189(11):191-194.
[53] 黄佳佳, 李鹏伟, 彭敏, 等. 基于深度学习的主题模型研究[J]. 计算机学报, 2020, 43(5):827-855. (HUANG J J, LI P W, PENG M, et al. Review of deep learning-based topic model[J]. Computer knowledge and technology, 2020, 43(5):827-855.)
[54] 谢珍, 马建霞, 胡文静. 基于多维度引用特征的学术论文评价研究[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践:1-11[2023-06-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.g3.20230403.1524.006.html. (XIE Z, MA J X, HU W J. Research on the evaluation of academic paper based on multidimensional citation characteristics[J/OL]. Information studies:theory & application:1-11[2023-06-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.g3.20230403.1524.006.html.)
[55] GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L, STRUTZEL E. The discovery of grounded theory:strategies for qualitative research[J]. Nursing research, 1968, 17(4):364.
[56] CHARMAZ K. Constructing grounded theory:a practical guide through qualitative analysis[M]. London:Sage, 2006.
[57] 侯剑华, 郑碧丽, 张洋. 科学知识扩散研究:概念界定、理论基础与体系重构[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(9):117-126. (HOU J H, ZHENG B L, ZHANG Y. Research on scientific knowledge diffusion:concept definition, theoretical basis, system reconstruction[J]. Journal of modern information, 2020, 40(9):117-126.)
[58] BASS F M. A new product growth model for consumer durables[M/OL]. Mathematical models in marketing:a collection of abstracts. Berlin:Springer, 1976:351-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_107.
[59] YOU H, LI M, HIPEL K W, et al. Development trend forecasting for coherent light generator technology based on patent citation network analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(2):297-315.
[60] MATEU-GELABERT P, SANDOVAL M, MEYLAKHS P, et al. Strategies to avoid opiate withdrawal:implications for HCV and HIV risks[J]. International journal of drug policy, 2010, 21(3):179-185.
[61] FRANK D, MATEU-GELABERT P, GUARINO H, et al. High risk and little knowledge:overdose experiences and knowledge among young adult nonmedical prescription opioid users[J]. International journal of drug policy, 2015, 26(1):84-91.
[62] FRIEDMAN S R, MATEU-GELABERT P, SANDOVAL M, et al. Positive deviance control-case life history:a method to develop grounded hypotheses about successful long-term avoidance of infection[J]. BMC public health, 2008, 8(1):1-10.
[63] COLLARD S S, ELLIS-HILL C. How do you exercise with epilepsy? insights into the barriers and adaptations to successfully exercise with epilepsy[J]. Epilepsy & behavior, 2017, 70(Pt A):66-71.
[64] LAURIDSEN E I, HIGGINBOTTOM G. The roots and development of constructivist grounded theory[J]. Nurse researcher, 2014, 21(5):8-13.
[65] WILLIAMS V, BRUTON A, ELLIS-HILL C, et al. The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on perceptions of breathlessness and activity in COPD patients:a qualitative study[J]. Primary care respiratory journal, 2010, 19(1):45-51.
[66] WILLIAMS V, BRUTON A, ELLIS-HILL C, et al. The importance of movement for people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Qualitative health research, 2011, 21(9):1239-1248.
[67] HARLEY A E, ODOMS-YOUNG A, BEARD B, et al. African American social and cultural contexts and physical activity:strategies for navigating challenges to participation[J]. Women & health, 2009, 49(1):84-100.
[68] HARLEY A E, BUCKWORTH J, KATZ M L, et al. Developing long-term physical activity participation:a grounded theory study with African American women[J]. Health education & behavior, 2009, 36(1):97-112.
[69] MURRAY-DAVIS B, MARSHALL M, GORDON F. Becoming an interprofessional practitioner:factors promoting the application of pre-qualification learning to professional practice in maternity care[J]. Journal of interprofessional care, 2014, 28(1):8-14.
[70] HENWOOD K, PIDGEON N. Grounded theory in psychological research[M/OL]. Qualitative research in psychology:expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington:American Psychological Association, 2003:131-155.
[71] MISHNA F, SAINI M, SOLOMON S. Ongoing and online:children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying[J]. Children and youth services review, 2009, 31(12):1222-1228.
[72] STRAUSS A, CORBIN J. Grounded theory methodology:an overview[M]. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 1994:273-285.
[73] 黄茜茜, 杨建林. 近十年我国图书情报学领域网络舆情研究方法应用分析[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(7):167-177. (HUANG Q Q, YANG J L. Analysis of the application of research methods on online public opinion in domestic library and information science in the last decade[J]. Journal of modern information, 2022, 42(7):167-177.)
